Kwon MJ, Kang HS, Kim HT, Choo JW, Lee BH, Hong SE, Park KH, Jung DM, Lim H, Soh JS, Moon SH, Kim JH, Park HR, Min SK, Seo JW, Choe JY. Treatment for gastric ‘indefinite for neoplasm/dysplasia’ lesions based on predictive factors. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(4): 469-484 [PMID: 30700943 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i4.469]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Ho Suk Kang, MD, Assistant Professor, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, 22, Gwanpyeong-ro 170beon-gil, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si 431-796, South Korea. hskang76@hallym.or.kr
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2019; 25(4): 469-484 Published online Jan 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i4.469
Table 1 Clinicopathologic factors of the confirmed carcinoma and non-carcinoma indefinite for neoplasm/dysplasia lesions reported at the initial forceps biopsy n (%)
Initial Dx
Total n = 461
IFND
P value
Final Dx
Non-carcinoma n = 357
Carcinoma n = 104
Sex
0.816
Male
319 (69.2)
248 (69.5)
71 (68.3)
Female
142 (30.8)
109 (30.5)
33 (31.7)
Age (yr)
< 0.001
< 60
236 (51.2)
204 (57.1)
32 (30.8)
≥ 60
225 (48.8)
153 (42.9)
72 (69.2)
Endoscopic size (mm)
< 0.001
< 10
286 (62.0)
251 (70.3)
35 (33.7)
≥ 10
175 (38.0)
106 (29.7)
69 (66.3)
Location I
0.914
Upper
43 (9.3)
34 (9.5)
9 (8.7)
Middle
122 (26.5)
93 (26.1)
29 (27.9)
Lower
296 (64.2)
230 (64.4
66 (63.5)
Location II
0.744
Fundus
9 (1.9)
8 (2.2)
1 (1.0)
Body
122 (26.5)
93 (26.1)
29 (27.9)
Antrum
277 (60.1)
213 (59.7)
64 (61.5)
Angle
53 (11.5)
43 (12.0)
10 (9.6)
Location III
0.267
Anterior wall
75 (16.3)
55 (15.4)
20 (19.2)
Posterior wall
76 (16.5)
63 (17.6)
13 (12.5)
Greater curvature
85 (18.4)
61 (17.1)
24 (23.1)
Lesser curvature
225 (48.8)
178 (49.9)
47 (45.2)
Gross type
0.585
Elevated (type I and IIa)
181 (39.3)
136 (38.1)
45 (43.3)
Flat (type IIb)
168 (36.4)
134 (37.5)
34 (32.7)
Depressed (type IIc and III)
112 (24.3)
87 (24.4)
25 (24.0)
Color change
0.140
Redness
314 (68.1)
250 (70.0)
64 (61.5)
Whitish
58 (12.6)
45 (12.6)
13 (12.5)
No change
89 (19.3)
62 (17.4)
27 (26.0)
Single lesion
< 0.001
No
141 (30.6)
134 (37.5)
7 (6.7)
Yes
320 (69.4)
223 (62.5)
97 (93.3)
Ulcer
0.182
No
334 (72.5)
264 (73.9)
70 (67.3)
Yes
127 (27.5)
93 (26.1)
34 (32.7)
Spontaneous bleeding
< 0.001
No
405 (87.9)
332 (93.0)
73 (70.2)
Yes
56 (12.1)
25 (7.0)
31 (29.8)
Fold change
0.206
No
418 (90.7)
327 (91.6)
91 (87.5)
Yes
43 (9.3)
30 (8.4)
13 (12.5)
Initial Bx
< 0.001
Regenerating atypia
276 (59.9)
267 (74.8)
9 (8.7)
Atypical epithelium
185 (40.1)
90 (25.2)
95 (91.3)
Repeated IFND
0.002
No
436 (94.6)
344 (96.4)
92 (88.5)
Yes
25 (5.4)
13 (3.6)
12 (11.5)
Bx numbers at initial endoscopic Bx
1.77 ± 1.13
2.15 ± 1.37
0.013
Table 2 Predictive factors of gastric carcinoma in the univariate and multivariate analyses
Univariate
Multivariate
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
Age (yr) (< 60 vs ≥ 60)
3.000 (1.882-4.782)
< 0.001
2.445 (1.305-4.580)
0.005
Endoscopic gross size (mm) (< 10 vs ≥ 10)
4.631 (2.906-7.380)
< 0.001
3.519 (1.891-6.548)
< 0.001
Multiple vs single lesion
8.327 (3.755-18.465)
< 0.001
5.702 (2.212-14.696)
< 0.001
Spontaneous bleeding (Absent vs Present)
5.639 (3.143-10.119)
< 0.001
4.056 (1.792-9.180)
0.001
Initial Bx (Regenerating atypia vs Atypical epithelium)
31.315 (15.180-64.599)
< 0.001
25.575 (11.537-56.695)
< 0.001
Repeated IFND (No vs Yes)
3.750 (1.631-8.622)
0.002
6.022 (1.822-19.909)
0.003
Table 3 Clinicopathologic factors of poor prognosis carcinoma in the subgroup analysis of the carcinoma group n (%)
Initial Dx
Total n = 104
Carcinoma group
P value
Final Dx
Non-poor prognostic carcinoma n = 75
Poor prognostic carcinoma n = 29
Sex
0.924
Male
71 (68.3)
51 (68.0)
20 (69.0)
Female
33 (31.7)
24 (32.0)
9 (31.0)
Age (yr)
0.053
< 60
32 (30.8)
19 (25.3)
13 (44.8)
≥ 60
72 (69.2)
56 (74.7)
16 (55.2)
Endoscopic size (mm)
0.082
< 10
35 (33.7)
29 (38.7)
6 (20.7)
≥ 10
69 (66.3)
46 (61.3)
23 (79.3)
Location I
0.162
Upper
9 (8.7)
7 (9.3)
2 (6.9)
Middle
29 (27.9)
17 (22.7)
12 (41.4)
Lower
66 (63.5)
51 (68.0)
15 (51.7)
Gross type
0.034
Elevated (type I and IIa)
45 (43.3)
36 (48.0)
9 (31.0)
Flat (type IIb)
34 (32.7)
26 (34.7)
8 (27.6)
Depressed (type IIc and III)
25 (24.0)
13 (17.3)
12 (41.4)
Color change
0.745
Redness
64 (61.5)
45 (60.0)
19 (65.5)
Whitish
13 (12.5)
9 (12.0)
4 (13.8)
No change
27 (26.0)
21 (28.0)
6 (20.7)
Single lesion
0.186
No
7 (9.3)
7 (6.7)
0 (0)
Yes
97 (93.3)
68 (90.7)
29 (100)
Ulcer
0.010
No
70 (67.3)
56 (74.7)
14 (48.3)
Yes
34 (32.7)
19 (25.3)
15 (51.7)
Spontaneous bleeding
0.517
No
73 (70.2)
54 (72.0)
19 (65.5)
Yes
31 (29.8)
21 (28.0)
10 (34.5)
Fold change
0.001
No
91 (87.5)
71 (94.7)
20 (69.0)
Yes
13 (12.5)
4 (5.3)
9 (31.0)
Initial Bx
0.707
Regenerating atypia
9 (8.7)
6 (8.0)
3 (10.3)
Atypical epithelium
95 (91.3)
69 (92.0)
26 (89.7)
Repeated IFND
1.000
No
92 (88.5)
66 (88.0)
26 (89.7)
Yes
12 (11.5)
9 (12.0)
3 (10.3)
Table 4 Predictive factors of poor prognosis carcinoma in the univariate and multivariate analyses
Univariate
Multivariate
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
Depressed Gross type (No vs Yes)
3.367 (1.301-8.710)
0.034
1.946 (0.621-6.104)
0.254
Ulceration (Absent vs Present)
3.158 (1.290-7.729)
0.010
1.746 (0.594-5.130)
0.311
Fold change (Absent vs Present)
7.988 (2.225-28.672)
0.001
5.594 (1.458-21.462)
0.012
Table 5 Diagnostic delays in gastric carcinoma and the clinicopathologic correlation n (%)
Early
Delayed
P
Early
Delayed
P
Early
Delayed
P
Early
Delayed
P
(≤ 2 wk)
(> 2 wk)
(≤ 2 mo)
(> 2 mo)
(≤ 6 mo)
(> 6 mo)
(≤ 1 yr)
(> 1 yr)
n = 28
n = 76
n = 73
n = 31
n = 96
n = 8
n = 97
n = 7
Initial Bx
0.109
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.112
RegA
0 (0)
9 (11.8)
1 (1.4)
8 (25.8)
1 (1.4)
8 (25.8)
7 (7.2)
2 (28.6)
AGL
28 (100)
67 (88.2)
72 (98.6)
23 (74.2)
72 (98.6)
23 (74.2)
90 (92.8)
5 (71.4)
Repeated IFND
0.033
0.001
0.048
0.032
No
28 (100)
64 (84.2)
70 (95.9)
22 (71.0)
87 (90.6)
5 (62.5)
88 (90.7)
4 (57.1)
Yes
0 (0)
12 (15.8)
3 (4.1)
9 (29.0)
9 (9.4)
3 (37.5)
9 (9.3)
3 (42.9)
Differentiation
1.000
0.729
1.000
0.554
Differ
25 (89.3)
68 (89.5)
66 (90.4)
27 (87.1)
86 (89.6)
7 (87.5)
87 (89.7)
6 (85.7)
Undiffer
3 (10.7)
8 (10.5)
7 (9.6)
4 (12.9)
10 (10.4)
1 (12.5)
10 (10.3)
1 (14.3)
Tumor size (pathology)
0.252
0.444
0.602
1.000
< 10 mm
6 (24.0)
27 (36.5)
21 (30.9)
12 (38.7)
31 (34.1)
2 (25.0)
31 (33.7)
2 (28.6)
≥ 10 mm
19 (76.0)
47 (63.5)
47 (69.1)
19 (61.3)
60 (65.9)
6 (75.0)
61 (66.3)
5 (71.4)
Invasion depth
0.103
0.395
0.197
0.341
≤ Mucosa
19 (67.9)
62 (82.7)
55 (76.4)
26 (83.9)
73 (76.8)
8 (100)
74 (77.1)
7 (100)
≥ Submucosa
9 (32.1)
13 (17.3)
17 (23.6)
5 (16.1)
22 (23.2)
0 (0)
22 (22.9)
0 (0)
LVI
1.000
0.581
0.278
0.246
No
27 (96.4)
73 (96.1)
71 (97.3)
29 (93.5)
93 (96.9)
7 (87.5)
94 (96.9)
6 (85.7)
Yes
1 (3.6)
3 (3.9)
2 (2.7)
2 (6.5)
3 (3.1)
1 (12.5)
3 (3.1)
1 (14.3)
Complete resection
0.033
1.000
1.000
1.000
No
5 (17.9)
3 (4.0)
6 (8.3)
2 (6.5)
8 (8.4)
0 (0)
8 (8.3)
0 (0)
Yes
23 (82.1)
72 (96.0)
66 (91.7)
29 (93.5)
87 (91.6)
8 (100)
88 (91.7)
7 (100)
Additional surgery
0.031
1.000
1.000
1.000
No
23 (82.1)
73 (96.1)
67 (91.8)
29 (93.5)
88 (91.7)
8 (100)
89 (91.8)
7 (100)
Yes
5(17.9)
3(3.9)
6(8.2)
2(6.5)
8(8.3)
0(0)
8(8.2)
0(0)
Recurrence
0.562
1.000
0.215
0.190
No
28 (100)
73 (96.1)
71 (97.3)
30 (96.8)
94 (97.9)
7 (87.5)
95 (97.9)
6 (85.7)
Yes
0 (0)
3 (3.9)
2 (2.7)
1 (3.2)
2 (2.1)
1 (12.5)
2 (2.1)
1 (14.3)
Endoscopic suspicion for carcinoma
0.003
0.016
1.000
1.000
No
10 (35.7)
52 (68.4)
38 (52.1)
24 (77.4)
57 (59.4)
5 (62.5)
58 (59.8)
4 (57.1)
Yes
18 (64.3)
24 (31.6)
35 (47.9)
7 (22.6)
39 (40.6)
3 (37.5)
39 (40.2)
3 (42.9)
Table 6 Retrospective prediction rate for the final diagnosis of 24 cases of repeated indefinite for neoplasm/dysplasia by five pathologists in a blinded H and E slide review
Sex
Age (yr)
Bx N
Original report
Final Dx
Review and Dx rate
1st Bx
2nd Bx
1st Bx
2nd Bx
1
M
80
2
AGL
AGL
W/D
60%
0%
2
F
78
2
RegA
RegA
Gastritis
100%
100%
3
M
78
2
AGL
AGL
W/D
60%
80%
4
F
76
2
AGL
RegA
W/D
20%
20%
5
M
75
2
AGL
AGL
W/D
80%
20%
6
M
72
2
RegA
AGL
W/D
0%
20%
7
M
72
3
RegA
AGL
W/D
100%
40%
8
M
68
2
AGL
AGL
W/D
100%
100%
9
F
67
2
RegA
AGL
Gastritis
80%
60%
10
M
66
2
RegA
RegA
Adenoma
100%
100%
11
M
66
2
AGL
AGL
Gastritis
60%
40%
12
M
61
3
AGL
AGL
Gastritis
60%
0%
13
M
60
2
AGL
AGL
W/D
0%
80%
14
F
59
2
AGL
AGL
W/D
80%
60%
15
M
59
4
RegA
RegA
Gastritis
100%
40%
16
M
57
3
RegA
RegA
Adenoma
20%
20%
17
M
56
2
AGL
AGL
Adenoma
80%
80%
18
M
56
2
AGL
AGL
W/D
20%
30%
19
M
55
2
RegA
RegA
Gastritis
100%
100%
20
F
54
3
AGL
RegA
W/D
0%
0%
21
M
51
3
AGL
RegA
W/D
0%
0%
22
M
51
3
RegA
RegA
Adenoma
100%
100%
23
M
49
2
RegA
RegA
Gastritis
20%
100%
24
M
42
2
RegA
RegA
Gastritis
80%
80%
Final Dx
1st Bx (A)
2nd Bx (A)
C
κ
P
Gastritis
n = 8
75.0%
60.8%
0.791
0.117
0.463
Adenoma
n = 4
78.3%
84.2%
1.000
0.733
0.001
Adenocarcinoma
n = 12
65.0%
63.3%
0.629
0.415
0.001
Citation: Kwon MJ, Kang HS, Kim HT, Choo JW, Lee BH, Hong SE, Park KH, Jung DM, Lim H, Soh JS, Moon SH, Kim JH, Park HR, Min SK, Seo JW, Choe JY. Treatment for gastric ‘indefinite for neoplasm/dysplasia’ lesions based on predictive factors. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(4): 469-484