Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2019; 25(36): 5530-5542
Published online Sep 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i36.5530
Published online Sep 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i36.5530
Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
Patients over the age of 18 yr, male or female | Contraindications to perform digestive endoscopy |
Cystic tumor of the pancreas > 15 mm to benefit from a puncture under EUS control to determine the etiological and gravity diagnosis. | Hemorrhagic disease, hemostasis or coagulation disorder (PR < 60%, APTT > 40 s or platelets < 60000/mm3). |
No transient shutdown of AVK, AOD or AAP | |
Complete clinical examination | |
Patients able to follow and understand the study and answer the questionnaire | |
Pregnant or lactating women (a urine pregnancy test was carried out in women of childbearing age) | |
Informed and written consent | Vulnerable persons: deprived of liberty or guardianship |
Affiliation to a social security |
Table 2 Pathologic features of surgical resections and mutational analysis of cystic fluid and neoplastic tissue
Final diagn-osis | Pat. code | Gender | Age | Status | Sample | Proportion of mutated allele | Patholo-gical feature-s | |||||||
KRAS | GNAS | TP53 | RAF1 | PTPRD | CTNNB1 | RNF43 | POLD1 | |||||||
Cancer | 1 | F | 73 | No mutatio-n | CF | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | MCN with invasive ADK |
NT | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
Cancer | 9 | M | 72 | Noncon-cordant mutatio-ns | CF | 0 | - | - | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | IPMN with invasive adenoca-rcinoma pT2N1 |
NT | 100 | - | - | 26 | 100 | - | - | - | ||||||
Cancer | 10 | F | 60 | Conc-ordant mutatio-ns | CF | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 50 | IPMN with invasive adenoca-rcinoma pT3N1 |
NT | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 24 | ||||||
Cancer | 13 | M | 66 | Concor-dant mutatio-ns | CF | 3 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | IPMN with invasive adenoca-rcinoma pT3N1 |
NT | 35 | - | 22 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
Cancer | 14 | M | 63 | Concor-dant mutatio-ns | CF | - | 37 | - | - | - | - | - | - | MCN with invasive ADK |
NT | - | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
Cancer | 15 | M | 83 | Concor-dant mutatio-ns | CF | 32 | 50 | - | - | - | - | - | - | IPMN with focal adenoca-rcinoma pTisN0 |
NT | 9 | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
Cancer | 17 | F | 71 | Concor-dant mutatio-ns | CF | 25 | 48 | - | - | - | 56 | - | - | IPMN with focal adenoca-rcinoma pTisN0 |
NT | 21 | 42 | - | - | - | 37 | - | - | ||||||
Cancer | 18 | M | 82 | Concor-dant mutatio-ns | CF | 41 | - | - | - | - | - | 39 | - | IPMN with focal adenoca-rcinoma pTisN0 |
NT | 32 | - | - | - | - | - | 35 | - | ||||||
Cancer | 19 | F | 67 | Concor-dant mutatio-ns | CF | 23 | - | 31 | - | - | - | - | - | MCN with invasive ADK |
NT | 0 | - | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
NO Cancer | 2 | M | 86 | No mutatio-n | CF | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | IPMN with low-grade dysplasi-a |
NT | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
NO Cancer | 3 | M | 75 | No mutatio-n | CF | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Serous cystaden-oma |
NT | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
NO Cancer | 4 | F | 66 | No mutatio-n | CF | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | IPMN with low-grade dysplasi-a |
NT | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
NO Cancer | 8 | F | 81 | No mutatio-n | CF | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Mucinou-s cystaden-oma |
NT | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
NO Cancer | 16 | M | 63 | No mutatio-n | CF | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Cystic lymphan-gioma |
NT | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
NO Cancer | 6 | M | 71 | Nonconc-ordant mutatio-ns | CF | 12 | 31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | IPMN with low-grade dysplasi-a |
NT | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
NO Cancer | 5 | M | 74 | Concor-dant mutatio-ns | CF | 41 | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | IPMN with low-grade dysplasi-a |
NT | 31 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
NO Cancer | 20 | M | 51 | Concor-dant mutatio-ns | CF | - | 26 | - | - | - | - | - | - | IPMN with low-grade dysplasi-a |
NT | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Table 3 KRAS/GNAS mutations in cystic fluid and final diagnosis
KRAS/GNAS mutations analysis in cystic fluid, n = 17 | Cancer | No cancer |
Positive mutations (+) | ||
Population size, n | 7 | 3 |
Patient codes | True positive: 10, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19 | False positive: 5, 6, 20 |
Negative mutations (-) | ||
Population size, n | 2 | 5 |
Patient codes | False negative: 1, 9 | True negative: 2, 3, 4, 8, 16 |
Total population, n | 9 | 8 |
Table 4 RAF/PTPRD/CTNNB1/RNF43/POLD1/TP53 mutations in cystic fluid and final diagnosis
RAF/PTPRD/CTNNB1/RNF43/POLD1/TP53 mutations in cystic fluid, n = 17 | Cancer | No cancer |
Positive (+) | ||
Population size, n | 5 | 0 |
Patient codes | True positive: 10, 13, 17, 18, 19 | False positive |
Negative mutations (-) | ||
Population size, n | 4 | 8 |
Patient codes | False negative: 1, 9, 14, 15 | True negative: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 16, 20 |
Total population, n | 9 | 8 |
- Citation: Laquière A, Lagarde A, Napoléon B, Bourdariat R, Atkinson A, Donatelli G, Pol B, Lecomte L, Curel L, Urena-Campos R, Helbert T, Valantin V, Mithieux F, Buono JP, Grandval P, Olschwang S. Genomic profile concordance between pancreatic cyst fluid and neoplastic tissue. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(36): 5530-5542
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i36/5530.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i36.5530