Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2019; 25(36): 5403-5422
Published online Sep 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i36.5403
Published online Sep 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i36.5403
Table 1 Evidence level and recommendation strength
Level | Detailed description |
Evidence Level | |
A | High quality: Further research cannot change the reliability of these treatment assessment results. |
B | Moderate quality: Further research may influence the reliability of these treatment assessment results, and may change the treatment assessment results. |
C | Low or very low quality: Further research will very likely influence the reliability of these treatment assessment results, and will very likely change the treatment assessment results. |
Recommendation strength | |
1 | Strong recommendation: It is clearly shown that either the benefits of intervention clearly outweigh the disadvantages, or that the disadvantages outweigh the benefits. |
2 | Weak recommendation: The benefits and disadvantages are unclear, or, regardless of the quality of the evidence, the benefits and disadvantages are comparable. |
Table 2 Classification of hepatic encephalopathy recommended by the 11th World Congress of Gastroenterology in 1998
Type of hepatic encephalopathy | Definition | Subcategory | Subdivision |
Type A | Hepatic encephalopathy associated with acute liver failure | None | None |
Type B | Hepatic encephalopathy associated with portosystemic shunt and no liver cell injury-associated liver disease | None | None |
Type C | Hepatic encephalopathy associated with cirrhosis with portal hypertension or portosystemic shunt | Episodic hepatic encephalopathy | Accompanying predisposition |
Table 3 Revised hepatic encephalopathy grading standards
Traditional West-Haven criteria | Grade 0 | HE grade 1 | HE grade 2 | HE grade 3 | HE grade 4 | |
Proposed revision of the HE grading criteria | No HE | MHE | HE grade 1 | HE grade 2 | HE grade 3 | HE grade 4 |
Table 4 Hepatic encephalopathy classification, symptoms, and signs
Revised HE grading criteria | Neuropsychiatric symptoms (that is, cognitive function) | Nervous system signs |
No HE | Normal | Normal nervous system signs, normal neuropsychological test results |
MHE | Potential HE, no noticeable personality or behavioral changes | Normal nervous system signs, but abnormal neuropsychological test results |
HE grade 1 | Trivial and mild clinical signs, such as mild cognitive impairment, decreased attention, sleep disorders (insomnia and sleep inversion), euphoria, or depression | Asterixis can be elicited and neuropsychological tests are abnormal |
HE Grade 2 | Marked personality or behavioral changes, lethargy or apathy, slight orientation abnormality (time and orientation), decreased mathematical ability, dyskinesia, or unclear speech | Asterixis is easily elicited, and neurophysiological testing is unnecessary |
HE Grade 3 | Marked dysfunction (time and spatial orientation), abnormal behavior, semi-coma to coma, but responsive | Asterixis usually cannot be elicited. There is ankle clonus, increased muscle tone, and hyperreflexia. Neurophysiological testing is unnecessary |
HE Grade 4 | Coma (no response to speech and external stimuli) | Increased muscle tone or positive signs of the central nervous system. Neurophysiological testing is unnecessary |
Table 5 Notes on neuropsychological/physiological testing methods in clinical use
Testing methods | Testing purposes | Time | Remarks |
Psychological tests | |||
Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) | PHES is an important method for determining cognitive dysfunction and diagnosing MHE in cirrhosis patients | Includes five subtests, namely the number connection test A and B, digit symbol test, line tracing test, and serial dotting test | Pen and paper |
Positives on at least two tests are required for clinical diagnosis | |||
Number connection test A | Ability to concentrate, mental activity speed, can be used for rapid outpatient screening for MHE | 30 to 120 s | Correction for age and education level improves accuracy |
Number connection test B | Ability to concentrate, mental activity speed, distributed attention ability, can be used for rapid outpatient screening for MHE | 1 to 3 min | Psychologist is required |
More complicated than number connection test A | |||
Digit symbol test | Ability to concentrate, mental activity speed, can be used for rapid outpatient screening for MHE | 2 min | Psychologist is required |
Stroop Smartphone app (Encephal App) | Attention, can be used for rapid outpatient screening for MHE | 3 to 5 min | Reliable and easy to use |
Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status | Compliance and working memory, visual spatial ability, language, cognitive processing speed | 25 min | Pen and paper |
Psychologist is required | |||
ISHEN recommends HE psychometric scores as substitute indicators | |||
Inhibition control test | Attention, reaction inhibition, working memory | 15 min | Computer processing |
Patient cooperation is required, and patients must learn before testing | |||
Neurophysiological testing | |||
Flicker fusion frequency | Visual identification, can be used on outpatient basis for HE scores of 2 or lower, value of supplemental diagnosis is low | 10 min | Patients must learn before testing |
EEG | Generalized brain activity. Suitable for children | Variation | Psychologist and specialized tools are required |
Evoked potential | Tests the time difference between electrical stimulation and response | Variation | P300 hearing has been used for the diagnosis of MHE |
- Citation: Xu XY, Ding HG, Li WG, Jia JD, Wei L, Duan ZP, Liu YL, Ling-Hu EQ, Zhuang H, Hepatology CSO, Association CM. Chinese guidelines on management of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(36): 5403-5422
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i36/5403.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i36.5403