Chen XQ, Xue CR, Hou P, Lin BQ, Zhang JR. Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio effectively predicts survival outcome of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(33): 4970-4984 [PMID: 31543687 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4970]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Jun-Rong Zhang, MD, Attending Doctor, Chief Doctor, Surgeon, Surgical Oncologist, Department of General Surgery (Emergency Surgery), Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29, Xin Quan Road, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China. junrongzhang@fjmu.edu.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2019; 25(33): 4970-4984 Published online Sep 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4970
Table 1 Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between emergency surgery and bridge to surgery groups
Characteristic
ES group (n = 90)
BTS group (n = 38)
P-value
Age (yr)
61.58 ± 14.84
63.21 ± 13.55
0.561
Female/Male, (%)
31 (34.40)/59 (65.60)
15 (39.50)/23 (60.50)
0.588
Size, (cm)
5.76 ± 2.12
6.88 ± 2.68
0.015
BMI, (kg/m2)
21.76 ± 2.42
22.20 ± 3.20
0.411
Cross score, (%)
0.001
0
21 (23.60)
21 (55.30)
1
40 (44.90)
16 (42.10)
2
17 (19.10)
1 (2.60)
3
10 (11.20)
0 (0.00)
4
1 (0.80)
0 (0.00)
ASH (+)/(-), (%)
17 (18.90)/73 (81.10)
10 (26.30)/28 (73.70)
0.347
Comorbidities (+)/(-), (%)
37 (41.10)/53 (58.90)
21 (55.30)/17 (44.70)
0.142
ASA grade, (%)
0.299
I
2 (2.20)
3 (7.90)
II
63 (70.00)
28 (73.70)
≥ III
25 (27.80)
7 (18.40)
Location, (%)
0.005
Right-side colon
13 (14.40)
1 (2.60)
Transverse colon
30 (33.30)
5 (13.20)
Left-side colon
37 (41.10)
28 (73.70)
Rectum
10 (11.10)
4 (10.50)
pTNM stage, (%)
0.186
I
4 (4.40)
0 (0.00)
II
23 (25.60)
9 (23.70)
III
44 (48.90)
25 (65.80)
IV
19 (21.10)
4 (10.50)
T stage, (%)
0.186
T1
4 (4.40)
0 (0.00)
T2
23 (25.60)
9 (23.70)
T3
44 (48.90)
25 (65.80)
T4
19 (21.10)
4 (10.50)
N stage, (%)
0.471
N0
31 (34.40)
9 (23.70)
N1
35 (38.90)
18 (47.40)
N2
24 (26.70)
11 (28.90)
M stage, (%)
0.292
M0
71 (78.9)
33 (86.8)
M1
19 (21.1)
5 (13.2)
Histological features, (%)
0.308
Well differentiated
3 (2.30)
0 (0.00)
Moderately differentiated
61 (67.80)
30 (78.90)
Poorly differentiated
26 (28.90)
8 (21.10)
LVI (+)/(-), (%)
15 (16.70)/75 (83.30)
14(36.80)/24(63.20)
0.013
WBC, (10^9)
8.99 ± 5.10
7.57 ± 2.61
0.042
NLR, (ratio)
7.11 ± 6.72
4.88 ± 3.02
0.012
dNLR, (ratio)
1.66 ± 0.41
1.67 ± 0.27
0.756
PLR, (ratio)
245.61 ± 144.17
229.98 ± 122.38
0.562
LMR, (ratio)
2.84 ± 2.43
2.34 ± 1.19
0.127
SII, (ratio)
1969.03 ± 2316.10
1235.74 ± 849.53
0.011
WBC-pre, (10^9)
9.18 ± 5.13
8.56 ± 3.44
0.434
NLR-pre, (ratio)
7.62 ± 6.97
6.05 ± 3.03
0.084
dNLR-pre, (ratio)
1.65 ± 0.41
1.68 ± 0.45
0.652
PLR-pre, (ratio)
263.98 ± 161.96
270.89 ± 171.35
0.830
LMR-pre, (ratio)
2.77 ± 2.32
2.38 ± 1.66
0.354
SII-pre, (ratio)
2186.46 ± 2474.96
1712.60 ± 1157.32
0.149
CEA, (ng/mL)
30.19 ± 120.54
17.88 ± 27.47
0.541
Chemotherapy (+)/(-), (%)
62 (68.90)/28 (31.10)
20 (52.60)/18 (47.40)
0.080
Table 2 Comparison of short-term and long-term outcomes between emergency surgery and bridge to surgery groups
Characteristic
ES group (n = 90)
BTS group (n = 38)
P-value
Surgical time, (min)
217.89 ± 60.69
204.64 ± 66.13
0.275
Blood loss, (mL)
177.30 ± 134.37
133.68 ± 95.76
0.072
Number of LNs
19.51 ± 9.47
21.45 ± 8.29
0.276
Time to flatus, (d)
3.88 ± 1.65
3.61 ± 1.15
0.359
Time to semi-fluid, (d)
8.62 ± 3.22
8.64 ± 3.96
0.738
Total hospital-stay, (d)
22.17 ± 12.48
22.34 ± 7.78
0.936
Stoma construction, n (%)
20 (22.20)
8 (21.10)
0.884
CD classification system, n (%)
0.547
Grade I
0 (0.00)
2 (2.20)
Grade II
44 (48.90)
16 (42.10)
Grade III
13 (14.40)
5 (13.20)
Grade IV
9 (10.00)
2 (5.30)
Grade V
1 (2.60)
1 (1.10)
Pneumonia, n (%)
18 (20.00)
8 (21.10)
0.892
Incision infection, n (%)
16 (17.80)
5 (13.20)
0.519
ICU intervention, n (%)
8 (8.90)
1 (2.60)
0.192
Leakage, n (%)
3 (3.30)
1 (2.60)
0.658
Sepsis, n (%)
3 (3.30)
1 (2.60)
0.658
SAE, n (%)
23 (25.60)
8 (21.10)
0.587
30 d-mortality, n (%)
1 (1.10)
1 (2.60)
0.507
36-OS time, (mo)
30.10 ± 9.64
29.41 ± 11.33
0.732
36-DFS time, (mo)
27.59 ± 12.19
27.48 ± 12.17
0.969
Table 3 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of long-term survival of emergency surgery and bridge to surgery groups
Group
Characteristic
3-year OS
3-year DFS
Cutoff point
AUC
95%CI
Cutoff point
AUC
95%CI
ES
NLR
19.3
0.582
0.446-0.718
19.3
0.565
0.407-0.723
dNLR
2.02
0.679
0.551-0.808
1.57
0.696
0.554-0.837
PLR
155
0.550
0.414-0.686
317
0.549
0.392-0.707
SII
3645
0.587
0.454-0.721
3645
0.564
0.403-0.726
CEA
6.7
0.591
0.458-0.724
11.2
0.604
0.442-0.766
BTS
LMR
1.67
0.611
0.424-0.798
1.67
0.571
0.366-0.776
CEA
7.6
0.549
0.350-0.747
5.5
0.552
0.348-0.756
Table 4 Comparison of clinicopathological features between high-ratio and low-ratio grades in both emergency surgery and bridge to surgery groups
Characteristic
ES group (n = 86)
BTS group (n = 38)
dNLR ≥ 1.57
dNLR < 1.57
P-value
LMR ≥ 1.67
LMR < 1.67
P-value
Cross score, (%)
0.738
0.378
0
11 (27.5)
10 (21.7)
10 (50.0)
11 (61.1)
1
16 (40.0)
22 (47.8)
10 (50.0)
6 (33.3)
2
8 (20.0)
8 (17.4)
0 (0.0)
1 (5.6)
3
4 (10.0)
6 (13.0)
4
1 (2.5)
0 (0.0)
ASH (+)/(-), (%)
6 (15.0)/34 (85.0)
10 (21.7)/36 (78.3)
4 (20.0)/16 (80.0)
6 (33.3)/12 (66.7)
Comorbidities (+)/(-), (%)
20 (50.0)/20 (50.0)
17 (37.0)/29 (63.0)
9 (45.0)/11 (55.0)
12 (66.7/)/6 (33.3)
ASA grade, (%)
0.320
0.623
I
0 (0.0)
1 (1.6)
1 (5.0)
2 (11.1)
II
13 (56.5)
47 (74.6)
16 (80.0)
12 (66.7)
≥ III
10 (43.5)
15 (23.8)
3 (15.0)
4 (22.2)
Location, (%)
0.007
0.523
Right-side colon
2 (5.0)
11 (23.9)
1 (5.0)
0 (0.00)
Transverse colon
10 (25.0)
19 (41.3)
3 (15.0)
2 (11.1)
Left-side colon
21 (52.5)
13 (28.3)
13 (65.0)
15 (83.3)
Rectum
7 (17.5)
3 (6.5)
3 (15.0)
1 (5.6)
pTNM stage, (%)
0.141
0.592
I
0 (0.0)
4 (8.7)
-
-
II
12 (30.0)
10 (21.7)
4 (20.0)
5 (27.8)
III
17 (42.5)
24 (52.2)
13 (65.0)
12 (66.7)
IV
11 (27.5)
8 (17.4)
3 (15.0)
1 (5.6)
T stage, (%)
0.141
0.592
T1
0 (0.0)
4 (8.7)
-
-
T2
12 (30.0)
10 (21.7)
4 (20.0)
5 (27.8)
T3
17 (42.5)
24 (52.2)
13 (65.0)
12 (66.7)
T4
11 (27.5)
8 (17.4)
3 (15.0)
1 (5.6)
N stage, (%)
0.648
0.009
N0
16 (40.0)
14 (30.4)
4 (20.0)
5 (27.8)
N1
14 (35.0)
19 (41.3)
6 (30.0)
12 (66.7)
N2
10 (25.0)
13 (28.3)
10 (50.0)
1 (5.6)
M stage, (%)
0.260
0.552
M0
29 (72.5)
38 (82.6)
17 (85.0)
16 (88.9)
M1
11 (27.5)
8 (17.4)
3 (15.0)
2 (11.1)
Histological features, (%)
0.605
0.411
Well differentiated
1 (2.5)
2 (4.3)
-
-
Moderately differentiated
30 (75.0)
30 (65.2)
15 (75.0)
15 (83.3)
Poorly differentiated
9 (22.5)
14 (30.4)
5 (25.0)
3 (16.7)
LVI (+)/(-), (%)
9 (22.5)/31 (77.5)
6 (13.0)/40 (87.0)
0.249
10 (50.0)/10 (50.0)
4 (22.2)/14 (77.8)
0.076
Stoma construction, (%)
0.000
0.589
Stoma
17 (42.5)
3 (6.5)
4 (20.0)
4 (22.2)
None
23(57.5)
43 (93.5)
16 (80.0)
14 (77.8)
Pneumonia, (+)/(-), (%)
12 (30.0)/28 (70.0)
6 (13.0)/40 (87.0)
0.054
2 (10.0)/18(90.0)
6 (33.3)/12 (66.7)
0.086
Incision infection, (+)/(-), (%)
8 (20.0)/32 (80.0)
8 (17.4)/38 (82.6)
0.486
2 (10.0)/18 (90.0)
3 (16.7)/15 (83.3)
0.448
ICU intervention, (+)/(-), (%)
5 (12.5)/35 (87.5)
3 (6.5)/43 (93.5)
0.281
1 (5.0)/19 (95.0)
0 (0.0)/18 (100.0)
0.526
Leakage, (+)/(-), (%)
1 (2.5)/39 (97.5)
2 (4.3)/44 (95.7)
0.553
0 (0.0)/20 (100.0)
1 (5.6)/17 (94.4)
0.474
Sepsis, (+)/(-), (%)
1 (2.5)/39 (97.5)
2 (4.3)/44 (95.7)
0.553
0 (0.0)/20 (100.0)
1 (5.6)/17 (94.4)
0.474
SAE, (+)/(-), (%)
10 (25.0)/30 (75.0)
11 (23.9)/35 (76.1)
0.907
5 (25.0)/15 (75.0)
3 (16.7)/15 (83.3)
0.411
30-day mortality, n (%)
1 (2.5)/39 (97.5)
0 (0.0)/46 (100.0)
0.465
1 (5.0)/19 (95.0)
0 (0.0)/18 (100.0)
0.526
36-OS time, (months)
28.05 ± 10.28
31.61 ± 9.16
0.106
25.26 ± 13.88
33.78 ± 5.35
0.020
36-DFS time, (months)
23.10 ± 13.85
31.45 ± 9.35
0.009
22.67 ± 14.02
31.50 ± 8.89
0.046
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for survival outcomes in both emergency surgery and bridge to surgery groups
3-year overall survival
ES group (n = 90)
BTS group (n = 38)
Univariate
Multivariate
Univariate
Multivariate
Characteristic
HR (95%CI)
P-value
HR (95%CI)
P-value
HR (95%CI)
P-value
HR (95%CI)
P-value
CEA (≥ 5 ng/mL vs < 5 ng/mL)
1.48 (0.70-3.11)
0.303
2.53 (0.68-9.35)
0.165
ASA (Grade ≥ III vs Grade < III)
1.50 (0.72-3.11)
0.277
1.64 (0.45-5.96)
0.454
pT stage (pT3-4 vs pT1-2)
1.66 (0.72-3.83)
0.238
4.17 (1.09-15.95)
0.037
pN stage (pN+ vs pN0)
1.05 (0.51-2.19)
0.887
5.02 (0.65-38.66)
0.122
LVI (+) vs LVI (-)
1.30 (0.53-3.15)
0.568
3.78 (1.23-11.64)
0.020
3.52 (1.03-12.02)
0.045
NLR ≥ 19.3 vs NLR < 19.3
2.98 (1.27-6.97)
0.012
dNLR ≥ 1.57 vs dNLR < 1.57
2.40 (1.12-5.13)
0.024
2.34 (1.08-5.07)
0.032
PLR ≥ 155 vs PLR < 155
1.83 (0.70-4.79)
0.217
SII ≥ 3645 vs SII < 3645
1.61 (0.71-3.61)
0.252
LMR ≥ 1.67 vs LMR < 1.67
4.09 (1.12-14.87)
0.033
4.57 (0.98-21.38)
0.053
Chemotherapy (+) vs (-)
0.74 (0.36-1.51)
0.402
1.43 (0.47-4.38)
0.529
Table 6 Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for oncological outcomes in both emergency surgery and bridge to surgery groups
3-year disease-free survival
ES group (n = 56)
BTS group (n = 32)
Univariate
Multivariate
Univariate
Multivariate
Characteristic
HR (95%CI)
P-value
HR (95%CI)
P-value
HR (95%CI)
P-value
HR (95%CI)
P-value
CEA (≥ 5 ng/mL vs < 5 ng/mL)
1.71 (0.74-3.95)
0.209
2.67 (0.72-9.90)
0.141
ASA (Grade ≥ III vs Grade < III)
0.890 (0.36-2.23)
0.803
1.49 (0.41-5.43)
0.542
pT stage (pT3-4 vs pT1-2)
2.26 (0.85-6.02)
0.104
2.48 (0.55-11.18)
0.239
pN stage (pN+ vs pN0)
1.48 (0.64-3.43)
0.361
2.48 (0.55-11.18)
0.239
LVI (+) vs LVI (-)
2.92 (1.25-6.81)
0.013
1.97 (0.66-5.88)
0.224
NLR ≥ 19.3 vs NLR < 19.3
2.76 (1.02-7.45)
0.046
dNLR ≥ 1.57 vs dNLR < 1.57
2.85 (1.17-6.95)
0.021
3.02(1.23-7.42)
0.016
PLR ≥ 317 vs PLR < 317
1.55 (0.66-3.67)
0.314
SII ≥ 3645 vs SII < 3645
2.04 (0.86-4.83)
0.104
LMR ≥ 1.67 vs LMR < 1.67
2.54 (0.83-7.80)
0.091
3.11 (1.13-8.54)
0.052
Chemotherapy (+) vs (-)
0.95 (0.41-2.19)
0.896
1.44 (0.47-4.41)
0.523
Table 7 Stratification analysis of oncological and survival outcomes between high-ratio and low-ratio grades in both emergency surgery and bridge to surgery groups
Characteristic
3-year OS
3-year DFS
HR (95%CI)
P-value
HR (95%CI)
P-value
ES (dNLR < 1.57)
Reference
-
Reference
-
BTS (dNLR < 1.57)
0.51 (0.18-1.39)
0.185
0.42 (0.13-1.34)
0.144
ES (dNLR ≥ 1.57)
Reference
-
Reference
-
BTS (dNLR ≥ 1.57)
1.87 (0.79-4.43)
0.155
1.79 (0.77-4.20)
0.178
ES (LMR < 1.67)
Reference
-
Reference
-
BTS (LMR < 1.67)
4.34 (1.27-14.82)
0.019
2.72 (0.97-7.65)
0.058
ES (LMR ≥ 1.67)
Reference
-
Reference
-
BTS (LMR ≥ 1.67)
0.40 (0.18-0.92)
0.031
0.42 (0.17-1.07)
0.068
Citation: Chen XQ, Xue CR, Hou P, Lin BQ, Zhang JR. Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio effectively predicts survival outcome of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(33): 4970-4984