Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2019; 25(33): 4945-4958
Published online Sep 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4945
Table 1 Association of carcinoembryonic antigen/tumor size with baseline characteristics of rectal cancer patients n (%)
Training cohort (n = 371)
Validation cohort (n = 185)
CasesLowHighP-valueCasesLowHighP-value
Age37158 (21-89)65 (32-86)< 0.001a18561 (25-87)57 (35-79)0.149
Tumor size3714.3 (0.8-13)4.3 (0.8-13.5)0.7731854.5 (1-13)4.3 (0.8-10)0.472
Sex0.4190.199
Male218177 (58)41 (64)10382 (53)21 (68)
Female153130 (42)23 (36)8272 (47)10 (32)
TNM stage0.008a0.350
I10496 (31)8 (12)4843 (28)5 (16)
II12799 (32)28 (44)7461 (40)13 (42)
III140112 (36)28 (44)6350 (32)13 (42)
Differentiation0.3950.826
Poor6051 (17)9 (14)2419 (12)5 (16)
Moderate209176 (57)33 (52)10285 (55)17 (55)
High10280 (26)22 (34)5950 (32)9 (29)
Lymphovascular invasion0.6970.683
Negative338281 (92)57 (89)173143 (93)30 (97)
Positive3326 (8)7 (11)1211 (7)1 (3)
Perineural invasion0.039a0.073
Negative340286 (93)54 (84)172146 (95)26 (84)
Positive3121 (7)10 (16)138 (5)5 (16)
CEA< 0.001a< 0.001a
0-5 ng/mL263262 (85)1 (2)127126 (82)1 (3)
> 5 ng/mL10845 (15)63 (98)5828 (18)30 (97)
CA 19-90.006a0.027a
0-37 ng/mL325276 (90)49 (77)158136 (88)22 (71)
> 37 ng/mL4631 (10)15 (23)2718 (12)9 (29)
Table 2 Univariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival
VariableTraining cohort (n = 371)
Validation cohort (n = 185)
Hazard ratio95%CIP-valueHazard ratio95%CIP-value
Age1.021.00-1.040.024a1.031.00-1.060.070
Tumor size1.040.92-1.180.5061.140.95-1.370.164
Sex (ref = male)1.430.88-2.310.1450.850.41-1.770.665
TNM1 (ref = stage I)1.741.26-2.410.001a1.931.15-3.220.012a
Differentiation1 (ref = poor)0.580.40-0.840.004a0.530.30-0.940.030a
Lymphovascular invasion (ref = negative)1.880.96-3.680.0663.111.19-8.130.021a
Perineural invasion (ref = negative)1.030.41-2.560.9541.290.31-5.460.729
CEA (ref = CEA < 5)1.811.11-2.940.017a2.721.33-5.590.006a
CA 19-9 (ref = CA 19-9 < 37)1.881.04-3.390.036a2.140.92-4.990.078
CEA/tumor size (ref = low)2.451.46-4.110.001a3.571.70-7.520.001a
Table 3 Univariate analysis of prognostic factors for disease-free survival
VariableTraining cohort (n = 371)
Validation cohort (n = 185)
Hazard ratio95%CIP-valueHazard ratio95%CIP-value
Age10.99-1.020.5721.020.99-1.040.173
Tumor size1.010.91-1.120.8281.120.97-1.300.128
Sex (ref = male)1.260.85-1.870.2470.750.41-1.370.353
TNM1 (ref = stage I)1.91.45-2.50<0.001a1.61.07-2.390.023a
Differentiation1 (ref = poor)0.780.58-1.060.1130.60.38-0.950.031a
Lymphovascular invasion (ref = negative)2.441.45-4.120.001a2.631.11-6.220.028a
Perineural invasion (ref = negative)2.171.23-3.820.008a1.980.78-5.030.151
CEA (ref = CEA < 5)1.551.03-2.320.034a1.91.05-3.410.033a
CA 19-9 (ref = CA 19-9 < 37)1.430.85-2.420.1771.960.97-3.960.061
CEA/tumor size (ref = low)1.721.10-2.710.018a2.581.37-4.850.003a
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival and disease-free survival
Training cohort (n = 371)
Validation cohort (n = 185)
OSHazard radio95%CIP-valueHazard radio95%CIP-value
Age1.021.00-1.040.023a1.051.02-1.090.003a
TNM1 (ref = stage I)1.471.04-2.070.031a1.841.04-3.240.035a
Differentiation1 (ref = poor)0.570.39-0.850.006a0.500.28-0.900.021a
CEA/tumor size (ref = low)2.181.28-3.730.004a4.832.21-10.52<0.001a
DFS
TNM1 (ref = stage I)1.751.32-2.32<0.001a1.430.94-2.170.091
Lymphovascular invasion (ref = negative)1.851.08-3.160.024a2.451.00-6.030.05
CEA/tumor size (ref = low)1.470.93-2.330.0962.611.38-4.950.003a