Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2019; 25(33): 4850-4869
Published online Sep 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4850
Table 1 Impact of radiotherapy on local recurrence and survival
StudynInterventionsLocal recurrenceOverall survival5-yr disease free survival
Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial, NEJM, 1997[24]116825 Gy in 5 fractions in one week surgery27% 11% (P ≤ 0.001)58% 48% (P = 0.004)74% 65% (after nine years) (P = 0.002)
Dutch Rectal Cancer Trial, NEJM, 2001[25]186125 Gy in one week TME surgery2.4% 8.2% (P ≤ 0.001)82% 81.8% (P = 0.2)N/A
MRC CR-07, Lancet, 2009[26]135025 Gy in one week TME surgery and adjuvant therapy27 (674) = 4% 72 (676) = 10.7%70.3% 67.9% (P = 0.4)73.6% 66.7% (P = 0.013)
Sauer et al[27], NEJM, 200485050.4 Gy over 5 wk with 5-FU TME surgery6% 13%76% 74%68% 65%
Fryckholm et al[28], 20017040 Gy and 5-FU 40 Gy4% 35% (P = 0.02)66% 38% (P = 0.03)29% 18% (P = 0.3)
Stockholm III trial, 2017[33]840Short course Short course w/ delay Long course w/ delay2.24% 2.8% 5.5%73% 76% 78%65% 64% 65%
Bujko et al[88], 20165155 × 5 Gy and FOLFOX 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions w/ 5-FU22% 21% (P = 0.82)73% 64.5% (P = 0.055)53% 52% (P = 0.74)
Trans-Tasman Oncology Group, 2012[89]3265 × 5 Gy in 1 wk 50.4 Gy in 5 wk7.5% 4.4% (P = 0.24)74% 70% (P = 0.62)N/A
Wawok et al[90], 2018515 × 5 Gy 50.4 Gy w/5-FU35% 5% (P = 0.036)47% 86% (P = 0.009)N/A
German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 study, 2012[91]123650.4 Gy w/ 5-FU (Control) 50.4 Gy w/5-FU and Oxaliplatin4.6% 2.9%88% 88.7%71.2% 75.9%
Table 2 RTOG/EORTC radiation toxicity grading system for lower gastrointestinal tract
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4
Early radiation toxicity (< 6 mo post radiotherapy)Increased frequency of bowel movements not requiring medical therapyIncreased frequency of bowel movements requiring medication or causing abdominal painDiarrhoea requiring IV treatment, mucous or bloody discharge PR, abdominal distentionAcute/subacute bowel obstruction, fistula formation, GI bleed requiring transfusion, abdominal pain requiring tube decompression
Late radiation toxicity (> 6 mo post radiotherapy)Bowel movements of 5 per day, mild abdominal cramping, mild PR bleedingBowel movements > 5 per day, increased mucous PR, intermittent PR bleedingObstruction or bleeding requiring operative managementNecrosis, perforation, fistula formation
Table 3 Studies on watch and wait outcomes, n (%)
StudynNA regimeRecurrenceSalvage therapySurvival post salvage therapySurvival
Habr-Gama et al[57], 200471Long-course radiotherapy w/ 5-FULocal:2 Distant: 32 (100)100%OS: 100% DFS: 92%
Habr-Gama et al[92], 201490Long course radiotherapy w/ 5-FULocal: 28 (31%)26 (92.8)OS: 94%OS: 91% DFS: 68%
OnCore Project, 2016[59]12945 Gy w/ 5-FULocal: 44 (34%)36 (88)N/AOS: 96% at 3 yr DFS: 88% at 3 yr
IWWD Consortium, 2015[58]880Chemoradiotherapy: 91%Local: 25.2%141 (69)OS: 75.4% DFS: 84%OS: 85% DFS: 94%
Appelt et al[93], 201540ChemoradiotherapyLocal: 25.9% at 2 yr9OS: 100% at 2 yr DFS: 100% at 2 yrOS: 100% at 2 years DFS: 70% at 2 years
Smith et al[94], 201232Long-course chemoradiotherapyLocal: 6 (18.75)6 (100)OS: 100% at 17 moOS: 96% DFS: 88% all at 17 mo
Smith et al[95], 2019113Local: 22 (19.5)22 (100)DFS: 91%OS: 73% DFS: 75%
Martens et al[96], 2016100Long-Course: 95% Short Course: 5%Local: 15% Distant: 5%13OS: 92.3%OS: 96.6% DFS: 80.6% all after 3 yr
Lai et al[97], 201618ChemoradiotherapyLocal: 22100%OS: 100%
Rijkmans et al[98], 201738External beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy (iridium)DFS: 42% OS: 63%
Vuong et al[99], 2007100External beam radiotherapy with brachytherapy (iridium)Local recurrence at 5 yr: 5%DFS: 65% OS: 70%
Gerard et al[100], 201974Contact X-ray brachytherapy10% at 3 yr2DFS: 88%
Sun Myint et al[101], 201883Contact X-ray brachytherapy13.2% after 2.5 yr (n = 7)6DFS: 83.1%
Ortholan et al[63], 201245External beam radiotherapy with contact X-ray boostDFS: 53% OS: 55%
Table 4 Outcomes in transanal endoscopic microsurgery
StudynPost-op complicationsLocal recurrenceSurvival
Lee et al[71], 201724711%7%DFS: 80%
CARTS study, Stijns et al[68], 201947N/A7.7%DFS: 81.6% OS: 82.8%
O’Neill et al[67], 20179210.9%6.7%DFS: 98.6% OS: 89.4% (after 3 yr)
Jeong et al[102], 200945015.5%DFS: 88.5% OS: 96.2%
Stipa et al[103], 201286 (T1 patients)N/A11.6% (for T1 tumours)OS: 92% (for T1 patients)
Baatrup et al[104],2009143N/A18%DFS: 87% OS: 66%
Van Den Eynde, 2019[105]5340%N/AN/A
Table 5 Transanal minimally invasive surgery studies
StudyPt numbers (n)Average distance from Anal Verge (cm)Positive marginsLocal recurrenceAverage length of follow-up
Atallah et al[70], 201069.30N/AN/A
Albert et al[73], 2013508.16%2 (4%)N/A
Keller et al[74], 201675 17 (malignant) 58 (benign)105
Garcia-Florez et al[106], 2017325.6110.3%26 mo
Van den Eynde et al[105], 201968612%N/A30 d
Melin et al[107], 2016296.7931Retrospective study