Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2019; 25(27): 3619-3633
Published online Jul 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3619
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of included subjects
CharacteristicValue
CD patients (n)21
Age (yr) (mean ± SD)43.4 ± 16.1
Gender (males: Females)11:10
CRP (mg/dL) [median (range)]21.0 (0.9-94.0)
ESR (mm/h) [median (range)]19 (7-51)
Days between MRE and endoscopy median [median (range)]4 (0-7)
Endoscopic findings of terminal ileum (n)
Overt ulcers12
Aphthoid lesions5
Erythema or edema conditions4
Control group (n)23
Age (yr) (mean ± SD)46.3 ± 15.4
Gender (males:females)11:12
Days between MRE and endoscopy [median (range)]3 (1-7)
Total (n)44
Age (yr) (mean ± SD)44.9 ± 15.7
Gender (males:females)22:22
Days between MRE and endoscopy [median (range)]4 (0-7)
Table 2 Intraobserver agreement and variability of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal ratio measurements between the two readers over two sessions
GroupCD (n = 21)
Normal (n = 23)
1st session reader 12nd session reader 1P-value1st session reader 22nd session reader 2P-value1st session reader 12nd session reader 1P-value1st session reader 22nd session reader 2P-value
ADC1.50 ± 0.401.54 ± 0.450.2011.52 ± 0.451.56 ± 0.470.1252.55 ± 0.532.53 ± 0.530.7722.57 ± 0.502.64 ± 0.570.450
ICC0.9520.9770.7360.711
CoV6.284.7110.4710.64
Bias (%)1.771.89-1.07-1.71
LoA (%)-14.10 to 17.65-10.65 to 14.42-30.75 to 28.62-28.30 to 24.86
SR4.17 ± 1.434.20 ± 1.360.5054.21 ± 1.344.23 ± 1.420.7941.45 ± 0.541.44 ± 0.530.6971.44 ± 0.521.45 ± 0.560.704
ICC0.9890.9790.9740.944
CoV3.514.645.938.69
Bias (%)1.39-0.07-0.580.45
LoA (%)-9.22 to 12.01-13.81 to 13.67-19.16 to 17.99-23.99 to 24.88
Table 3 Interobserver agreement and variability of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal ratio measurements between the two readers over two sessions
GroupCD (n = 21)
Normal (n = 23)
1st session reader 11st session reader 2P-value2nd session reader 12nd session reader 2P-value1st session reader 11st session reader 2P-value2nd session reader 12nd session reader 2P-value
ADC1.50 ± 0.401.52 ± 0.450.4021.54 ± 0.451.56 ± 0.470.3792.55 ± 0.532.57 ± 0.500.8152.53 ± 0.532.64 ± 0.570.208
ICC0.9690.9840.6410.736
CoV4.713.7311.4311.07
Bias (%)-0.72-0.82-1.20-3.98
LoA (%)-14.29 to 12.85-12.09 to 10.44-32.03 to 29.62-33.93 to 25.96
SR4.17 ± 1.434.21 ± 1.340.4734.20 ± 1.364.23 ± 1.420.5691.45 ± 0.541.44 ± 0.520.7601.44 ± 0.531.45 ± 0.560.618
ICC0.9810.9890.9500.971
CoV4.533.728.126.27
Bias (%)-1.85-0.390.43-0.59
LoA (%)-17.30 to 13.60-12.38 to 11.61-22.17 to 23.04-19.47 to 18.29
Table 4 Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal ratio for differentiating inflammatory lesions from normal terminal ileum
CD (n = 21)Normal (n = 23)P-valueCut-off valueAUROCSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
First reader
ADC value1.52 ± 0.422.54 ± 0.49< 0.001a1.800.92385.795.7
SR value4.19 ± 1.391.44 ± 0.53< 0.001a2.240.98190.595.7
Second reader
ADC value1.54 ± 0.462.61 ± 0.48< 0.001a1.810.92985.795.7
SR value4.22 ± 1.371.45 ± 0.53< 0.001a2.070.98895.295.7