Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2019; 25(27): 3619-3633
Published online Jul 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3619
Published online Jul 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3619
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of included subjects
Characteristic | Value |
CD patients (n) | 21 |
Age (yr) (mean ± SD) | 43.4 ± 16.1 |
Gender (males: Females) | 11:10 |
CRP (mg/dL) [median (range)] | 21.0 (0.9-94.0) |
ESR (mm/h) [median (range)] | 19 (7-51) |
Days between MRE and endoscopy median [median (range)] | 4 (0-7) |
Endoscopic findings of terminal ileum (n) | |
Overt ulcers | 12 |
Aphthoid lesions | 5 |
Erythema or edema conditions | 4 |
Control group (n) | 23 |
Age (yr) (mean ± SD) | 46.3 ± 15.4 |
Gender (males:females) | 11:12 |
Days between MRE and endoscopy [median (range)] | 3 (1-7) |
Total (n) | 44 |
Age (yr) (mean ± SD) | 44.9 ± 15.7 |
Gender (males:females) | 22:22 |
Days between MRE and endoscopy [median (range)] | 4 (0-7) |
Table 2 Intraobserver agreement and variability of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal ratio measurements between the two readers over two sessions
Group | CD (n = 21) | Normal (n = 23) | ||||||||||
1st session reader 1 | 2nd session reader 1 | P-value | 1st session reader 2 | 2nd session reader 2 | P-value | 1st session reader 1 | 2nd session reader 1 | P-value | 1st session reader 2 | 2nd session reader 2 | P-value | |
ADC | 1.50 ± 0.40 | 1.54 ± 0.45 | 0.201 | 1.52 ± 0.45 | 1.56 ± 0.47 | 0.125 | 2.55 ± 0.53 | 2.53 ± 0.53 | 0.772 | 2.57 ± 0.50 | 2.64 ± 0.57 | 0.450 |
ICC | 0.952 | 0.977 | 0.736 | 0.711 | ||||||||
CoV | 6.28 | 4.71 | 10.47 | 10.64 | ||||||||
Bias (%) | 1.77 | 1.89 | -1.07 | -1.71 | ||||||||
LoA (%) | -14.10 to 17.65 | -10.65 to 14.42 | -30.75 to 28.62 | -28.30 to 24.86 | ||||||||
SR | 4.17 ± 1.43 | 4.20 ± 1.36 | 0.505 | 4.21 ± 1.34 | 4.23 ± 1.42 | 0.794 | 1.45 ± 0.54 | 1.44 ± 0.53 | 0.697 | 1.44 ± 0.52 | 1.45 ± 0.56 | 0.704 |
ICC | 0.989 | 0.979 | 0.974 | 0.944 | ||||||||
CoV | 3.51 | 4.64 | 5.93 | 8.69 | ||||||||
Bias (%) | 1.39 | -0.07 | -0.58 | 0.45 | ||||||||
LoA (%) | -9.22 to 12.01 | -13.81 to 13.67 | -19.16 to 17.99 | -23.99 to 24.88 |
Table 3 Interobserver agreement and variability of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal ratio measurements between the two readers over two sessions
Group | CD (n = 21) | Normal (n = 23) | |||||||||||||
1st session reader 1 | 1st session reader 2 | P-value | 2nd session reader 1 | 2nd session reader 2 | P-value | 1st session reader 1 | 1st session reader 2 | P-value | 2nd session reader 1 | 2nd session reader 2 | P-value | ||||
ADC | 1.50 ± 0.40 | 1.52 ± 0.45 | 0.402 | 1.54 ± 0.45 | 1.56 ± 0.47 | 0.379 | 2.55 ± 0.53 | 2.57 ± 0.50 | 0.815 | 2.53 ± 0.53 | 2.64 ± 0.57 | 0.208 | |||
ICC | 0.969 | 0.984 | 0.641 | 0.736 | |||||||||||
CoV | 4.71 | 3.73 | 11.43 | 11.07 | |||||||||||
Bias (%) | -0.72 | -0.82 | -1.20 | -3.98 | |||||||||||
LoA (%) | -14.29 to 12.85 | -12.09 to 10.44 | -32.03 to 29.62 | -33.93 to 25.96 | |||||||||||
SR | 4.17 ± 1.43 | 4.21 ± 1.34 | 0.473 | 4.20 ± 1.36 | 4.23 ± 1.42 | 0.569 | 1.45 ± 0.54 | 1.44 ± 0.52 | 0.760 | 1.44 ± 0.53 | 1.45 ± 0.56 | 0.618 | |||
ICC | 0.981 | 0.989 | 0.950 | 0.971 | |||||||||||
CoV | 4.53 | 3.72 | 8.12 | 6.27 | |||||||||||
Bias (%) | -1.85 | -0.39 | 0.43 | -0.59 | |||||||||||
LoA (%) | -17.30 to 13.60 | -12.38 to 11.61 | -22.17 to 23.04 | -19.47 to 18.29 |
Table 4 Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal ratio for differentiating inflammatory lesions from normal terminal ileum
CD (n = 21) | Normal (n = 23) | P-value | Cut-off value | AUROC | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | |
First reader | |||||||
ADC value | 1.52 ± 0.42 | 2.54 ± 0.49 | < 0.001a | 1.80 | 0.923 | 85.7 | 95.7 |
SR value | 4.19 ± 1.39 | 1.44 ± 0.53 | < 0.001a | 2.24 | 0.981 | 90.5 | 95.7 |
Second reader | |||||||
ADC value | 1.54 ± 0.46 | 2.61 ± 0.48 | < 0.001a | 1.81 | 0.929 | 85.7 | 95.7 |
SR value | 4.22 ± 1.37 | 1.45 ± 0.53 | < 0.001a | 2.07 | 0.988 | 95.2 | 95.7 |
- Citation: Yu H, Shen YQ, Tan FQ, Zhou ZL, Li Z, Hu DY, Morelli JN. Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance enterography in ileal Crohn's disease: A systematic analysis of intra and interobserver reproducibility. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(27): 3619-3633
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i27/3619.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3619