Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2019; 25(27): 3484-3502
Published online Jul 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3484
Published online Jul 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3484
Table 1 Risk factors for metachronous peritoneal metastases
Risk factors for metachronous peritoneal metastases |
Advanced T stage |
Lymph node metastases |
Synchronous ovarian metastases |
Poor differentiation |
Colon origin (versus rectal origin) |
Uncomplete primary tumor resection |
Mucinous adenocarcinoma |
Signet ring histology |
Emergency surgery at diagnosis |
Young age |
Table 2 Patient and operative factors associated with cytoreductive and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy morbidity (modified from Newton et al[70])
Patients characteristics | Operative factors |
Age > 60-70 yr | Pancreatic resections |
Performance status | Bowel resection and anastomosis |
Hypoalbuminemia | Surgeon experience |
Peritoneal carcinomatosis index |
Table 3 Survival of patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer treated by cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
Author/ Years/ Country | 1-yr SR (%) | 3-yr SR (%) | 5-yr SR (%) | Mortality rate (%) | Morbidity rate (%) | Median OS (mo) | OS 95%CI (mo) | PFS 95%CI (mo) | DFS/RFS 95%CI (mo) | Follow-up times (range) (mo) |
Controlled studies | ||||||||||
Franko/2010/America[109] | 92 | 51 | 28 | NR | NR | 34.7 | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Gervais/2013/Canada[110] | 92 | 61 | 36 | 4 | 20 | 54 | NR | NR | 8 | 22.8 (2-81) |
Goéré/2015/France[111] | 90 | 52 | 32 | 5.8 | 29.5 | 35 | NR | NR | NR | 60 (47-74) |
Huang/2014/China[112] | 63.6 | 16 | NR | 0 | 28.6 | 13.7 | 10.0-16.5 | NR | NR | 41.5 (11.5-70.9) |
HIPEC single arm studies | ||||||||||
Cao/2009/Australia[113] | 83.6 | 51.4 | 32.1 | NR | NR | 37.0 | 1-72 | NR | NR | 19 (1-72) |
Ceelen/2014/Belgium[61] | 75 (NNT) 75 (NCA) 96 (NCB) | 39 (NNT) 30 (NCA) 71 (NCB) | 25 (NNT) 13 (NCA) | NR | NR | 25 (NNT) 22 (NCA) 39 (NCB) 30 (AC) 22 NAC) | 19.1-30.9 (NNT) 12.9-31.1 (NCA) 17.6-60.4 (NCB) 20.7-39.3 (AC) 14.2-29.8 (NAC) | NR | NR | 18 |
Elias/2014/France[53] | 91.4 | 54 | 36.5 | 4.2 | 17 | 41 | NR | NR | NR | 62.4 (55.6-77.6) |
Frøysnes/2016/Norway[114] | 93 | 65 | 36 | 0 | 15.5 | 47 | 42-52 | NR | 10 (7-12) | 45 (35-55) |
Hamilton/2011/Canada[115] | 79 | 38 | 34 | NR | NR | 27 | 0-87 | NR | 9 (0-87) 3-yr 34% 5-yr 26% | 28 (0-119) (all) |
Hompes/2012/Belgium[116] | 97.9 | 84 | NA | 0 | 52.1 | NA | NA | NR | 19.8 (RFS) | 22.7 (3.2- 55.7) |
Passot/2016/France[117] | 83 | 51 | 31 | NR | 30 | 36 | NR | NR | 11 | NR |
Prada-Villaverde/2014/Spain[118] | 85 | 45 | 35 | NR | NR | 31.4 | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Quenet/2011/France[119] | 92 | 36 | 44 | 4.1 | 47.2 | 41 | 32-60 | NR | 10.9 3-yr 15% | 30.3 (2-88) |
Table 4 Studies on the ClinicalTrials.gov registry investigating the role of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy on high risk patients for preventing peritoneal metastases from colorectal origin
ClinicalTrials.gov ID | Phase | High risk criteria | Control vs Treatment arms |
NCT01226394 ProphyloCHIP trial | Phase III | Complete resection of minimal abdominal synchronous metastases or perforated tumors | Surveillance vs second-look laparotomy with HIPEC (intraperitoneal oxaliplatin and intravenous 5-FU) after primary resection |
NCT02231086 COLOPEC trial | Phase III | T4, N0-2M0 or perforated colon cancer | Adjuvant systemic therapy only vs adjuvant systemic therapy + HIPEC, without resection of target organs |
NCT02974556 PROMENADE trial | Phase III | T3-T4 tumors | Resection of target organs for peritoneal implants, plus HIPEC with oxaliplatin and concomitant i.v., 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin |
NCT02179489 | Phase III | T4M0 and complete resection of minimal abdominal synchronous metastases or perforated tumors | Surgery vs surgery and HIPEC with mitomycin C (without preventive excision of target organs) |
NCT02965248 APEC trial | Phase II | T4NanyM0 and T3-NanyM0 + mucinous or signet ring cells histology | Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy alone (arm A) vs systemic chemo + HIPEC with raltitrexed (arm B) or oxaliplatin (arm C) |
NCT02614534 HIPEC T4 | Phase III | Complete resection of T4a, bNanyM0 | Surgery vs prophylactic HIPEC with mitomycin plus target organs excision |
NCT03413254 COLOPEC-II | Phase III | Complete resection of T4a, bN0-2M0 | Routine follow-up (arm A) vs a second exploratory laparoscopy (arm B) and third exploratory laparoscopy (arm C) if the work-up is negative |
NCT02974556 | Phase III | Complete resection of T3-4NanyM0 | Systemic chemotherapy alone vs CRS/HIPEC with oxaliplatin and systemic therapy |
NCT02758951 | Phase II/III | Complete resection of colorectal tumors with ≤ 50% of signet ring cells. | Upfront CRS-HIPEC alone vs pre/post perioperative systemic chemotherapy and CRS-HIPEC |
NCT02830139 | Phase II | Complete resection of T3-4NanyM0 | CRS + systemic chemotherapy vs CRS + HIPEC with paclitaxel + 5-FU + postoperative chemotherapy |
Table 5 Studies on the ClinicalTrials.gov registry investigating the role of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy
Number Clinical Trial | Experimental therapy | Malignant origin | Cytotoxic drugs | Primary outcomes |
NCT03280511 The PIPAC-OPC3 CC Trial | Exploratory Laparoscopy + biopsies + 1st PIPAC 2 mo after radical primary resection+/-adyuvant chemo + 2nd PIPAC 5 wk later | High risk colorectal cancer patients | Oxaliplatin (92 mg/m²) | Peritoneal recurrence |
NCT03246321 CRC-PIPAC | ePIPAC + leuvocorin + 5-FU iv | Colorectal / appendiceal carcinomas | Oxaliplatin (92 mg/m²) | Major toxicity |
NCT03210298 | PIPAC/PITAC | Peritoneal metastasis of various origins | Depends on tumor origin | Overall survival |
NCT02604784 PI-CaP | PIPAC fixed repeated dose vs PIPAC increasing single dose | Gastric, colorectal and ovarian cancers or primary peritoneal tumors | Cisplatin + doxorubicin or oxaliplatin (92 mg/m²) | Overall response rate |
- Citation: Sánchez-Hidalgo JM, Rodríguez-Ortiz L, Arjona-Sánchez Á, Rufián-Peña S, Casado-Adam Á, Cosano-Álvarez A, Briceño-Delgado J. Colorectal peritoneal metastases: Optimal management review. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(27): 3484-3502
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i27/3484.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3484