Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2019; 25(26): 3408-3425
Published online Jul 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3408
Published online Jul 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3408
Table 1 Main clinical demographics and histological growth patterns in patients with colorectal carcinoma and liver metastasis in the study
Case No. | Liver metastasis growth pattern | Primary colorectal growth pattern | Tumor budding score | Crohn's disease-like appearance | Liver metastasis (mo) | Follow-up (mo) | Prognosis | Major mutations |
1 | DGP | EGP | L | + | 16 | 57 | Alive without tumor | APC, KRAS, BRCA2 |
2 | DGP | IGP | M | - | 6 | 25 | Alive with bone metastasis | NA |
3 | DGP | IGP | H | - | 46 | 52 | Alive with liver metastasis | NA |
4 | DGP | EGP | M | + | 25 | 33 | Alive with liver metastasis | APC, KRAS, PIK3CA, BRCA1 |
5 | DGP | EGP | L | + | 39 | 46 | Alive without tumor | NA |
6 | DGP | IGP | L | - | 8 | 33 | Alive with liver metastasis | NA |
7 | DGP | IGP | L | + | 25 | 32 | Alive without tumor | NA |
8 | DGP | EGP | L | - | 6 | 44 | Alive with tubular adenoma | APC, TP53, PIK3CA |
9 | DGP | EGP | L | - | 12 | 28 | Alive without tumor | NA |
10 | DGP | EGP | L | + | 7 | 21 | Alive without tumor | NA |
11 | DGP | EGP | L | - | 7 | 16 | Alive without tumor | APC, TP53, FAT4, BRAF |
12 | DGP | IGP | M | + | 5 | 25 | Alive without tumor | NA |
13 | DGP | IGP | L | + | 6 | 42 | Alive without tumor | NA |
14 | DGP | EGP | M | - | 38 | 54 | Alive with lung metastasis | NA |
15 | DGP | EGP | L | - | 17 | 20 | Alive without tumor | TP53, DNAH5, FAT4 |
16 | RGP | IGP | H | - | 2 | 17 | Alive without tumor | DNAH5, KRAS, FAT4 |
17 | RGP | IGP | H | - | 5 | 72 | Alive without tumor | NA |
18 | RGP | IGP | H | - | 16 | 63 | Died of liver metastasis | NA |
19 | RGP | IGP | L | - | 9 | 35 | Alive without tumor | NA |
20 | RGP | IGP | H | - | 25 | 58 | Alive without tumor | NA |
21 | RGP | EGP | L | - | 6 | 23 | Alive without tumor | NA |
22 | RGP | IGP | M | - | 28 | 48 | Alive without tumor | APC, TP53, SMAD4 |
23 | RGP | IGP | H | - | 40 | 60 | Alive without tumor | APC, CTNNB1 |
24 | RGP | IGP | M | - | 6 | 17 | Died of liver metastasis | NA |
25 | RGP | IGP | M | - | 6 | 33 | Died of liver metastasis | APC, TP53, KRAS, ERBB2, ERBB3 |
26 | RGP | EGP | L | + | 7 | 41 | Died of liver metastasis | NA |
27 | RGP | IGP | H | - | 5 | 35 | Died of brain metastasis | NA |
28 | RGP | IGP | L | - | 27 | 32 | Died of liver metastasis | NA |
29 | RGP | IGP | H | - | 3 | 12 | Alive without tumor | TP53, LRP2, SDK1 |
Table 2 Association between clinicopathological characteristics and growth patterns
Characteristic | Group A | Group B | P-value | |
Sex | Male | 9 | 10 | 0.6999 |
Female | 6 | 4 | ||
Age | Mean ± SD | 67.5 ± 9.6 | 62.3 ± 13.6 | 0.2774 |
Median | 67 | 60.5 | ||
Range | 50-82 | 43-82 | ||
Serum CEA level | Mean ± SD | 15.5 ± 25.2 | 46.9 ± 148.7 | 0.3823 |
(μg/L) | Median | 3.7 | 5.65 | |
Range | 0.9-88.0 | 1.1-563.2 | ||
Localization | Cecum | 3 | 3 | 0.6621 |
Ascending | 2 | 0 | ||
Transverse | 1 | 1 | ||
Descending | 1 | 0 | ||
Sigmoid | 2 | 3 | ||
Rectum | 6 | 7 | ||
Size (cm) | Mean ± SD | 4.2 ± 1.3 | 4.3 ± 2.4 | 0.5814 |
Median | 4.6 | 4 | ||
Range | 2.0-6.0 | 2.0-11.0 | ||
Configuration | Exophytic | 7 | 7 | 0.2643 |
Endophytic | 8 | 5 | ||
N/A | 0 | 2 | ||
Histologic grade | G1 | 5 | 7 | 0.3060 |
G2 | 8 | 7 | ||
G3 | 2 | 0 | ||
Tumor depth | T1 | 0 | 0 | 0.6999 |
T2 | 0 | 0 | ||
T3 | 9 | 10 | ||
T4 | 6 | 4 | ||
Lymph node metastasis | Positive | 9 | 10 | 0.6999 |
Negative | 6 | 4 | ||
Tumor budding score (TBS) | High | 1 | 7 | 0.0275 |
Intermediate | 4 | 3 | ||
Low | 10 | 4 | ||
Negative | 0 | 0 | ||
Tumor deposits | Positive | 3 | 4 | 0.6817 |
Negative | 12 | 10 | ||
Lymphovascular invasion | Positive | 11 | 12 | 0.6513 |
Negative | 4 | 2 | ||
Perineural invasion | Positive | 10 | 12 | 0.3898 |
Negative | 5 | 2 | ||
Peri-tumoral inflammatory cell band | Negative | 5 | 4 | 0.5974 |
Low grade | 8 | 6 | ||
High grade | 2 | 4 | ||
Crohn’s disease-like response | Positive | 7 | 1 | 0.0352 |
Negative | 8 | 13 | ||
Histologic growth pattern | EGP | 9 | 2 | 0.0209 |
IGP | 6 | 12 |
Table 3 Value of selected pathological characteristics in predicting the histological growth patterns of colorectal carcinoma liver metastasis
Pathological characteristic | Value | Group A | Group B |
HGP | SE% (CI) | 60.0 (35.8-80.2) | 85.7 (60.1-97.5) |
SF% (CI) | 85.7 (60.1-97.5) | 60.0 (35.8-80.2) | |
PPV% (CI) | 81.8 (52.3-96.8) | 66.7 (43.8-83.7) | |
NPV% (CI) | 66.7 (43.8-83.7) | 81.8 (52.3-96.8) | |
TBS | SE% (CI) | 66.7 (41.7-84.8) | 71.4 (45,4-88.3) |
SF% (CI) | 71.4 (45,4-88.3) | 66.7 (41.7-84.8) | |
PPV% (CI) | 71.4 (45.4-88.3) | 66.7 (41.7-84.8) | |
NPV% (CI) | 66.7 (41.7-84.8) | 71.4 (45.4-88.3) | |
CDR | SE% (CI) | 46.7 (24.8-69.9) | 92.9 (68.5-99.6) |
SF% (CI) | 92.9 (68.5-99.6) | 46.7 (24.8-69.9) | |
PPV% (CI) | 87.5 (52.9-99.4) | 61.9 (40.9-79.3) | |
NPV% (CI) | 61.9 (40.9-79.3) | 87.5 (52.9-99.4) | |
HGP + TBS | SE% (CI) | 80.0 (54.8-93.0) | 85.7 (60.1-97.5) |
SF% (CI) | 71.4 (45.4-88.3) | 46.7 (24.8-69.9) | |
PPV% (CI) | 75.0 (50.5-89.8) | 60.0 (38.7-78.1) | |
NPV% (CI) | 76.9 (49.7-91.8) | 77.8 (45.3-96.1) | |
HGP + CDR | SE% (CI) | 80.0 (54.8-93.0) | 92.9 (68.5-99.6) |
SF% (CI) | 85.7 (60.1-97.5) | 26.7 (10.9-52.0) | |
PPV% (CI) | 85.7 (60.1-97.6) | 54.2 (35.1-72.1) | |
NPV% (CI) | 80.0 (54.8-93.0) | 80.0 (37.6-99.0) | |
TBS + CDR | SE% (CI) | 80.0 (54.8-93.0) | 92.9 (68.5-99.6) |
SF% (CI) | 71.4 (45.4-88.3) | 33.3 (15.2-58.3) | |
PPV% (CI) | 75.0 (50.5-89.8) | 56.5 (36.8-74.4) | |
NPV% (CI) | 76.9 (49.7-91.8) | 83.3 (43.7-99.2) | |
HGP + TBS + CDR | SE% (CI) | 86.7 (62.1-97.6) | 92.9 (68.5-99.6) |
SF% (CI) | 71.4 (45.4-88.3) | 20.0 (7.0-45.2) | |
PPV% (CI) | 76.5 (52.7-90.4) | 52.0 (33.5-70.0) | |
NPV% (CI) | 83.3 (55.2-97.0) | 75.0 (30.1-98.7) |
- Citation: Wu JB, Sarmiento AL, Fiset PO, Lazaris A, Metrakos P, Petrillo S, Gao ZH. Histologic features and genomic alterations of primary colorectal adenocarcinoma predict growth patterns of liver metastasis. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(26): 3408-3425
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i26/3408.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3408