Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2019; 25(26): 3283-3290
Published online Jul 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3283
Published online Jul 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3283
Aims | Conclusions | Diuretic effect analysis | Observations | |
Ruiz-del-Arbol et al[3], 2003 | To investigate the pathogenesis of circulatory dysfunction in SBP and to assess whether impaired circulatory function is associated with increased portal pressure | SBP patients frequently develop progressive impairment in systemic hemodynamics, leading to severe renal and hepatic failure, aggravation of portal hypertension, encephalopathy, and death. | Not Performed | The group that developed renal injury presented with: |
Decreased liver function; | ||||
BUN/creatinine ratio of almost 40:1, suggesting the presence of pre-renal injury by hypovolemia. | ||||
The suggestion that renal failure would be caused by a decrease in CO has some critical aspects: | ||||
CO decreased, but remained in the normal range, not explaining a renal failure per se. | ||||
If a decrease in CO directly causes renal failure, an increase in pulmonary pressure is expected but was not observed, suggesting a reduction in plasma volume – diuretic effect? | ||||
Ruiz-del-Arbol et al[4], 2005 | To investigate circulatory function in cirrhosis before and after the development of hepatorenal syndrome | Hepatorenal syndrome is the result of decreased cardiac output in the setting of severe arterial vasodilation | Not performed | The group developing HRS (old criteria of 1996) presented: |
Decreased basal renal function | ||||
Hemodynamic values were characteristics of hypovolemia: low CO, but also low pulmonary pressures with low stroke volume. Diuretic effect? | ||||
Krag et al[5], 2009 | To investigate the relationship between cardiac and renal function in patients with cirrhosis and ascites and the impact of cardiac systolic function on survival | Development of renal failure and poor outcome in patients with advanced cirrhosis and ascites seem to be related to a cardiac systolic dysfunction | Not performed | Cardiac index by gated myocardial perfusion imaging with an extreme low value of 1.5 L/min/m2 as cut-off. |
Body surface area needed to calculate CI with the Dubois formula, which contains weight, overestimated by ascites, resulting in lower CI. A CI less than 2.2 L/min/m2 is defined as cardiogenic shock, turning the 1.5 L/min/m2 cut-off into an underestimation or defining a very severe heart failure group. | ||||
The group with lower CI was using 30 mg more furosemide and had higher creatinine levels, with 50% already presenting HRS-2 at baseline, compromising any survival analysis. | ||||
Sersté et al[10], 2010 | To evaluate the effect of the administration of beta-blockers on long-term survival in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites | Treatment with beta-blockers is associated with poor survival in patients with refractory ascites. These results suggest that beta-blockers should be contraindicated in these patients | Not performed | There were 70% of patients with intractable ascites by renal injury at the time of inclusion. There is no description about NSBB use among these patients. |
Patients in the NSBB group had more advanced disease than the group that had not taken NSBBs. | ||||
The independent variables with higher HR to predict death were hyponatremia and renal injury, which could be related to diuretic use. Diuretic use was not included in the analyzed model. | ||||
Sersté et al[11], 2011 | To investigate the incidence of PICD before and after discontinuation of beta-blockers in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. A self control cross-over study | The use of beta-blockers may be associated with a high risk of PICD in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites | Not performed | Small number of patients. Ten patients with refractory ascites, six were diuretic-resistant ascites. No information about diuretic dosage during the assessment. |
- Citation: Brito-Azevedo A. Diuretic window hypothesis in cirrhosis: Changing the point of view. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(26): 3283-3290
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i26/3283.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3283