Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2019; 25(22): 2734-2742
Published online Jun 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i22.2734
Published online Jun 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i22.2734
Table 1 Classification of pancreatic cysts
(A) Mucinous Cysts |
1 Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN) |
Branch Duct IPMN |
Mixed Duct IPMN |
2 Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm (MCN) |
(B) Non-mucinous Cysts |
Serous Cystadenoma (SCA) |
Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor (SPT) |
Cystic Neuroendocrine Tumor (Cystic-NET) |
Squamous-Lined Cysts |
Epidermoid Cysts |
Lymphoepithelial Cysts |
Pseudocysts |
(C) Other malignant Cysts |
Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Cystic Degeneration |
Acinar Cell Cystadenocarcinoma |
Cystic Degeneration of Metastatic Lesions to the Pancreas |
Table 2 Treatment and surveillance guidelines for pancreatic cysts
Guideline | Recommendations |
Sendai 2006 [8] | Recommended surgical resection if any of the following lesions were suspected: |
MCNs | |
Main duct IPMNs | |
Mixed duct IPMNs | |
Also recommended surgical resection also based on: | |
Clinical symptoms | |
Dilated pancreatic duct (≥6mm) | |
Intracystic mural nodules | |
Positive cytology [8] | |
Fukuoka 2012 [6] | Recommended surgical resection for high-risk criteria: |
Dilated pancreatic duct (≥10mm) | |
Presence of an enhancing solid component | |
Obstructive jaundice [6] | |
American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) 2015 [9] | Recommended EUS-FNA if 2 out of 3 of the following high-risk features were present: |
Size ≥ 3 cm | |
Dilated main pancreatic duct | |
Solid component | |
Recommended surgical resection if a cyst had both of the following: | |
Solid component | |
Dilated pancreatic duct and/or concerning features on EUS-FNA [9] | |
Fukuoka 2017 [7] | Enhancing mural nodule is a high risk feature if measuring ≥ 5 mm |
Added surveillance guidelines for BD-IPMN, noting presence of lymphadenopathy, increased serum CA19-9 and cyst growth rate >5 mm in diameter over 2 years as “worrisome features” [7] |
Table 3 A summary of molecular biomarkers for pancreatic cysts types
Pancreatic cyst type | Molecular biomarkers |
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm | KRAS, GNAS, RNF43 positive[22,24,29,34,37] |
Advanced neoplasia: TP53, SMAD4, PIK3CA, PTEN, CDKN2A, AKT1, p16, p53 positive[30-34,38,39] | |
Mucinous cystic neoplasm | KRAS, RNF3 positive[22,24,29,34,37] |
GNAS negative[24,28,29] | |
Advanced neoplasia: TP53, SMAD4, PIK3CA, PTEN, CDKN2A, AKT1 positive[30-34] | |
Serious cystadenoma | VHL positive[22,24,28] |
Solid papillary neoplasm | CTNNB1 positive[22,24] |
Pseudocyst | Negative for DNA |
Cystic neuroendocrine tumor | Not well described |
Molecular analysis of PCL fluid | EUS-nCLE of PCLs |
(DNA analysis) | |
High sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of mucinous PCLs | High sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of mucinous PCLs |
Markers can detect advanced neoplasia in IPMNs; need validation in multicenter studies | Need further studies to address role of EUS-nCLE in the identification of advanced neoplasia in PCLs |
Lower sensitivity for the detection of KRAS mutations in MCNs | Detection of flat epithelium in MCNs can be difficult for early adapters of EUS-nCLE |
Need large multicenter prospective studies with confirmed histopathology to replicate single center results | Need large multicenter prospective studies with confirmed histopathology to replicate single center results |
Lack of established markers for cystic-NET and squamous lined cysts | EUS-nCLE reveals specific image patterns for different PCL types. Unable to differentiate between cystic-NET and SPN |
During EUS-FNA, 5%-10% of PCLs may not yield DNA for molecular analysis | There is a 2%-5% risk of technical and procedural issues with failure of image acquisition during EUS-nCLE |
Low sensitivity for the detection of VHL mutations in SCAs | EUS-nCLE identifies characteristic ‘fern-pattern’ of vascularity for diagnosing SCAs |
- Citation: Durkin C, Krishna SG. Advanced diagnostics for pancreatic cysts: Confocal endomicroscopy and molecular analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(22): 2734-2742
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i22/2734.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i22.2734