Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2019; 25(20): 2524-2538
Published online May 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i20.2524
Published online May 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i20.2524
Interventional studies | ||||
Authors | Patients | Treatment | HCC recurrence after 42-54 mo | P value |
Yoshiji et al[13] | 87 with RFA for prior HCC | I. Control | 18/25 | I vs II; < 0.01 |
II. ACE-I + vit. K2 | 9/25 | |||
19/19 | I vs III, NS | |||
III. ACE-I | 18/18 | |||
IV. vit. K2 | I vs IV; NS | |||
Yoshiji et al[14] | 89 with Insulin resistance and RFA for prior HCC | I. Control | 16/26 | I vs II; < 0.01 |
II. ACE-I + BCAA | 9/28 | |||
I vs III, NS | ||||
11/19 | ||||
III. ACE-I | 9/16 | |||
IV. BCAA | I vs IV; NS | |||
Yoshiji et al[15] | 54 with HCC randomized in 2 groups, before treatment | I. HCC treatment | 77% | I vs II < 0.01 |
II. HCC treatment + ACE-I and Vit. K | ||||
40% | ||||
Observational studies | ||||
Authors | Patients | Treatment | OS, HR, OR | P value |
Ho et al[16] | 7724 HBV-patients | ACE-I or ARB (46.3% in HBV and 42.5% in HCV) within 6 mo after initiating DAAs | HCC risk after ACE-I and ARB exposure | NS1 |
7873 HCV- patients | HR = 0.97, 95%CI: 0.81-1.16 | |||
at high-risk of HCC development | ||||
HR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.80-1.16 | ||||
respectively | ||||
Hagberg et al[17] | 490 HCC | ACE-I or ARBs | OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.85-1.55 | NS2 |
1909 controls | users vs non- users | |||
Walker et al[18] | 224 HCC | 7% ACE-I users in HCC group | OR = 1.29, 95%CI: 0.88-1.88 | NS3 |
5.9% ACE-I users in control group | ||||
2313 controls | unexposed vs exposed | |||
Pinter et al[19] | 156, with Sorafenib or supportive therapy | ACE-I or ARBs in 43 pts. | OS = 11.9 mo vs 6.8 mo | P = 0.014 |
P = 0.011 | ||||
HR = 0.6, 95%CI: 0.4-0.9 | P = 0.043 | |||
P = 0.038 | ||||
76, (confirmation cohort) with sorafenib or supportive therapy | ||||
ACE-I or ARBs in 38 pts. | OS = 19.5 mo vs 10.9 mo | |||
HR = 0.5, 95%CI: 0.3-1.0 | ||||
Facciorusso et al[20] | 153 with RFA for prior HCC | I: Control,73 pts | OS = 48 mo | I vs II, NS |
II: ACE-I, 49 pts | OS = 72 mo | |||
OS = 84 mo | ||||
I < III, P < 0.002 | ||||
III. ARBs, 31 pts | HR4 = 0.39, 95%CI: 0.22-0.66 | |||
Kabori et al[21] | 185 HCV-HCC pts. without cirrhosis | I. No hypert. | OS at 5 yr (76/106) | I vs II, NS |
II. Hypert. + ACE/ARB | OS at 5 yr (30/37) | |||
I > III, P < 0.001 | ||||
OS at 5 yr (11/42) | ||||
II > III, P < 0.001 | ||||
III. Hypert. + other | ||||
anti-hypertensives | ||||
141 HCV-HCC pts. with cirrhosis | I. No hypertension | OS at 5 yr 51.6% | I and II > III, P = 0.029 | |
OS at 5 yr 76.7% | ||||
II. Hypert. + ACE/ARB | ||||
OS at 5 yr 37.3% | ||||
III. Hypert. + other | ||||
143 pts. with HCC related to other etiologies | I. No hypertension | OS at 5 yr 59%-74% | NS | |
OS at 5 yr 60%-62% | ||||
II. Hypertension |
Animal model | Treatment | Results | Comments | |
Saber et al[25] | DEN-induced HCC in mice | I. Sorafenib | Both treatments improved liver histology; II. reduced α-feto-protein and VEGF level | Inhibition of proliferation by involvement of NFкB pathway and cyclin D1 |
vs | ||||
II. ACEIs or ARBs | ||||
Saber et al[26] | DEN-induced HCC in mice | 1 Sorafenib | ACE-Is and ARBs monotherapy or plus sorafenib improved liver histology with regression to grade 1, almost restoration of lobular architecture | No survival improvement |
2 ACE-I ± Sorafenib | No additional effect when combination therapy was used | |||
3 ARB ± Sorafenib | ||||
Nasr et al[27] | DEN-induced HCC in mice | Leflunomide Perindopril Curcumin | All drugs abrogated: hepatic microvessel density, elevated VEGF; only curcumin reduced HIF-1α. Nodules reduced or absent | Combination of these agents: further inhibited neovascularization |
Mansour et al[29] | DEN + carbon tetra-chloride in rats | ACE-I ARBs | Significant reduction of tumor markers and hepatic growth factors | Liver histology amelioration correlated with VEGF, CD31 and FGF |
Yanase et al[30] | DEN-treated rats | combined effect of ACE-I and 5-fluorouracil | Inhibition of HCC growth, neovascularization (VEGF and CD31+ vessels suppression), and marked increase of apoptosis | In vitro studies on EC tubular formation confirm the anti-angiogenetic effect |
Male BALB/c mice with injections of BNL-HCC cells. | ||||
Yoshiji et al[31] | DEN-treated mice | Vit. K and ACE-I used singularly or in combination | Inhibitory effects by each compound on hepato-carcinogenesis, more potent when used in combination | Increased apoptosis in the tumor, w/o any effect on tumor cell proliferation; CD31 mRNA suppression |
Male BALB/c mice with injections of BNL-HCC cells | ||||
Yoshiji et al[32] | DEN-treated rats and human HCC cell lines | Vit. K or ACE-I alone or in combination | Chemopreventive effect on pre-neoplastic foci formation by single compounds, more potent when combined. | Inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation and tubular formation; reduction of CD31 mRNA expression. |
Yoshiji et al[33] | DEN-treated rats | Interferon, ACE-I used singularly or in combination | IFN or PE, when used singularly, significantly attenuated, in combination nearly abolished HCC | CD31 and VEGF mRNA expression were reduced; apoptosis was also reduced; no change of cell proliferation |
Yoshiji et al[34] | DEN-treated rats | Perindopril (ACE-I) | Inhibition of neo-vascularization and VEGF expression | Suppression of VEGF-induced tubular formation; no effect on endothelial cell proliferation in vitro |
Endothelial cells in vitro |
Model | Treatment | Results | Comments | |
Fan et al[35] | 1 Tumor cell lines | Candesartan | Angiotensin II up-regulated AT1R and promoted production of VEGF in vitro. Candesartan reversed this process and downregulated the expression of VEGF-A in tumor xenografts | AT1R expression was associated to angiogenic potential in HCC human tissues |
2 BALB/c nude mice with injections of HCC cell lines | ||||
3 Human HCC specimens | ||||
Du et al[36] | 1 Tumor cell lines | AT2R over- expression by AT2R recombinant adenoviral vector | Overexpression of AT2R in transduced HCC cell lines produced apoptosis and inhibited cell proliferation. Higher AT2R expression could increase the growth of HCC and the prolifera-tion of HCC cells in vivo | A moderate expression of AT2R could increase the growth of HCC and the proliferation of HCC cells in vivo. AT2R mechanisms remain to be elucidated |
2 BALB/c nude mice with intra-liver injections of human HCC cells | ||||
Noguchi et al[37] | BALB/c mice injected with HCC cell lines | ACE-I and interferon-beta | Combination therapy was effective even on established tumors. Suppression of VEGF and endothelial cell proliferation and tubular formation, increase of apoptosis; | No effect on HCC cell proliferation. |
Yoshiji et al[38] | BALB/c mice injected with HCC cell lines. Endothelial cell cultures | Retroviral tetracycline up-regulated VEGF gene expression and Perindopril (ACE-I) | Perindopril significantly attenuated VEGF-mediated tumor growth and neovascularization. In vitro, VEGF-induced endothelial cell migration inhibition | Suppression of VEGF |
Yoshiji et al[39] | BALB/c mice injected with HCC cell lines. BNL CL2 cell line | Captopril Perindopril Temocapril Losartan Candesartan | Reduction of tubular formation and microvessel density in the tumor. Higher VEGF mRNA expression reduction and HCC growth inhibition by perindopril compared to temocapril and captopril. Neither candesartan nor losartan significantly inhibited the tumor development | ACE-Is suppressed the tumor development mainly by a mechanism which was independent from AT1-R blockage. |
Tamaki et al[40] | Male Wistar rats receiving modified choline-deficient low-methionine diet | Telmisartan | No HCC in telmisartan group vs 54.6% of HCC in control group. Telmisartan inhibited the dietary-induced up-regulation of VEGF, TGF-β1, CTGF, HIF1α and TNF-α mRNA levels | Telmisartan may prevent hepatocarcinogenesis through the inhibition of hepatic angiogenesis |
Noguchi et al[41] | Male Fisher-344 rats receiving modified choline-deficient low-methionine diet | Perindopril Eplerenone (selective aldosterone blocker) Aldosterone | Significant inhibitory effects on the GST-P positive pre-neoplastic lesion development; reduction of VEGF expression tubule formation and neovascularization | Combination of Perindopril + Eplerenone exerted a stronger suppression than single treatment |
Yoshiji et al[42] | Male OLETF rats (spontaneous development of insulin resistance) treated with Diethylnitrosamine | branched-chain amino acids perindopril | Number/size of preneoplastic foci were significantly suppressed by treatment of both drugs suppression of CD31- and VEGF-mRNA | In vitro suppression of tubule formation, regardless of drug concentration |
Oura et al[43] | Five human HCC cell lines (HepG2, HLF, HLE, HuH-7 and PLC/PRF/5) | Telmisartan | Only telmisartan reduced proliferation in most of cell lines. Promotion of apoptosis, Enhancement of bFGF reduction of p-ErbB3 | Arrest of cell cycle in G1, and S phase. Effect is dose-dependent and may be mediated by induction of MPK/mTOR signaling. |
Valsartan | ||||
Irbesartan | ||||
Losartan | ||||
Santhekadur et al[44] | Hep3B and QGY-7703 cell lines | Losartan | SND1 increases AT1R level by augmenting AT1R mRNA stability; Losartan inhibited both cell migration and invasion | SND1 induces TGF-β expression through AT1R signaling |
Cook et al[45] | H4-II-E-C3 rat hepatoma cells transfected with Ang II | Losartan Candesartan | Losartan inhibits Angiotensin II-induced proliferation | Both losartan and candesartan are equally effective in competing with Ang II/AT1 receptor interactions on the cell surface |
- Citation: Barone M, Viggiani MT, Losurdo G, Principi M, Leo AD. Systematic review: Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in chemoprevention of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(20): 2524-2538
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i20/2524.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i20.2524