Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2019; 25(20): 2524-2538
Published online May 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i20.2524
Table 1 Clinical studies on the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers exposure in patients affected or at high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma
Interventional studies
AuthorsPatientsTreatmentHCC recurrence after 42-54 moP value
Yoshiji et al[13]87 with RFA for prior HCCI. Control18/25I vs II; < 0.01
II. ACE-I + vit. K29/25
19/19I vs III, NS
III. ACE-I18/18
IV. vit. K2I vs IV; NS
Yoshiji et al[14]89 with Insulin resistance and RFA for prior HCCI. Control16/26I vs II; < 0.01
II. ACE-I + BCAA9/28
I vs III, NS
11/19
III. ACE-I9/16
IV. BCAAI vs IV; NS
Yoshiji et al[15]54 with HCC randomized in 2 groups, before treatmentI. HCC treatment77%I vs II < 0.01
II. HCC treatment + ACE-I and Vit. K
40%
Observational studies
AuthorsPatientsTreatmentOS, HR, ORP value
Ho et al[16]7724 HBV-patientsACE-I or ARB (46.3% in HBV and 42.5% in HCV) within 6 mo after initiating DAAsHCC risk after ACE-I and ARB exposureNS1
7873 HCV- patientsHR = 0.97, 95%CI: 0.81-1.16
at high-risk of HCC development
HR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.80-1.16
respectively
Hagberg et al[17]490 HCCACE-I or ARBsOR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.85-1.55NS2
1909 controlsusers vs non- users
Walker et al[18]224 HCC7% ACE-I users in HCC groupOR = 1.29, 95%CI: 0.88-1.88NS3
5.9% ACE-I users in control group
2313 controlsunexposed vs exposed
Pinter et al[19]156, with Sorafenib or supportive therapyACE-I or ARBs in 43 pts.OS = 11.9 mo vs 6.8 moP = 0.014
P = 0.011
HR = 0.6, 95%CI: 0.4-0.9P = 0.043
P = 0.038
76, (confirmation cohort) with sorafenib or supportive therapy
ACE-I or ARBs in 38 pts.OS = 19.5 mo vs 10.9 mo
HR = 0.5, 95%CI: 0.3-1.0
Facciorusso et al[20]153 with RFA for prior HCCI: Control,73 ptsOS = 48 moI vs II, NS
II: ACE-I, 49 ptsOS = 72 mo
OS = 84 mo
I < III, P < 0.002
III. ARBs, 31 ptsHR4 = 0.39, 95%CI: 0.22-0.66
Kabori et al[21]185 HCV-HCC pts. without cirrhosisI. No hypert.OS at 5 yr (76/106)I vs II, NS
II. Hypert. + ACE/ARBOS at 5 yr (30/37)
I > III, P < 0.001
OS at 5 yr (11/42)
II > III, P < 0.001
III. Hypert. + other
anti-hypertensives
141 HCV-HCC pts. with cirrhosisI. No hypertensionOS at 5 yr 51.6%I and II > III, P = 0.029
OS at 5 yr 76.7%
II. Hypert. + ACE/ARB
OS at 5 yr 37.3%
III. Hypert. + other
143 pts. with HCC related to other etiologiesI. No hypertensionOS at 5 yr 59%-74%NS
OS at 5 yr 60%-62%
II. Hypertension
Table 2 Studies on the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers in diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocellular carcinoma animal models
Animal modelTreatmentResultsComments
Saber et al[25]DEN-induced HCC in miceI. SorafenibBoth treatments improved liver histology; II. reduced α-feto-protein and VEGF levelInhibition of proliferation by involvement of NFкB pathway and cyclin D1
vs
II. ACEIs or ARBs
Saber et al[26]DEN-induced HCC in mice1 SorafenibACE-Is and ARBs monotherapy or plus sorafenib improved liver histology with regression to grade 1, almost restoration of lobular architectureNo survival improvement
2 ACE-I ± SorafenibNo additional effect when combination therapy was used
3 ARB ± Sorafenib
Nasr et al[27]DEN-induced HCC in miceLeflunomide Perindopril CurcuminAll drugs abrogated: hepatic microvessel density, elevated VEGF; only curcumin reduced HIF-1α. Nodules reduced or absentCombination of these agents: further inhibited neovascularization
Mansour et al[29]DEN + carbon tetra-chloride in ratsACE-I ARBsSignificant reduction of tumor markers and hepatic growth factorsLiver histology amelioration correlated with VEGF, CD31 and FGF
Yanase et al[30]DEN-treated ratscombined effect of ACE-I and 5-fluorouracilInhibition of HCC growth, neovascularization (VEGF and CD31+ vessels suppression), and marked increase of apoptosisIn vitro studies on EC tubular formation confirm the anti-angiogenetic effect
Male BALB/c mice with injections of BNL-HCC cells.
Yoshiji et al[31]DEN-treated miceVit. K and ACE-I used singularly or in combinationInhibitory effects by each compound on hepato-carcinogenesis, more potent when used in combinationIncreased apoptosis in the tumor, w/o any effect on tumor cell proliferation; CD31 mRNA suppression
Male BALB/c mice with injections of BNL-HCC cells
Yoshiji et al[32]DEN-treated rats and human HCC cell linesVit. K or ACE-I alone or in combinationChemopreventive effect on pre-neoplastic foci formation by single compounds, more potent when combined.Inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation and tubular formation; reduction of CD31 mRNA expression.
Yoshiji et al[33]DEN-treated ratsInterferon, ACE-I used singularly or in combinationIFN or PE, when used singularly, significantly attenuated, in combination nearly abolished HCCCD31 and VEGF mRNA expression were reduced; apoptosis was also reduced; no change of cell proliferation
Yoshiji et al[34]DEN-treated ratsPerindopril (ACE-I)Inhibition of neo-vascularization and VEGF expressionSuppression of VEGF-induced tubular formation; no effect on endothelial cell proliferation in vitro
Endothelial cells in vitro
Table 3 Experimental studies on the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers in different hepatocellular carcinoma animal models and in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines
ModelTreatmentResultsComments
Fan et al[35]1 Tumor cell linesCandesartanAngiotensin II up-regulated AT1R and promoted production of VEGF in vitro. Candesartan reversed this process and downregulated the expression of VEGF-A in tumor xenograftsAT1R expression was associated to angiogenic potential in HCC human tissues
2 BALB/c nude mice with injections of HCC cell lines
3 Human HCC specimens
Du et al[36]1 Tumor cell linesAT2R over- expression by AT2R recombinant adenoviral vectorOverexpression of AT2R in transduced HCC cell lines produced apoptosis and inhibited cell proliferation. Higher AT2R expression could increase the growth of HCC and the prolifera-tion of HCC cells in vivoA moderate expression of AT2R could increase the growth of HCC and the proliferation of HCC cells in vivo. AT2R mechanisms remain to be elucidated
2 BALB/c nude mice with intra-liver injections of human HCC cells
Noguchi et al[37]BALB/c mice injected with HCC cell linesACE-I and interferon-betaCombination therapy was effective even on established tumors. Suppression of VEGF and endothelial cell proliferation and tubular formation, increase of apoptosis;No effect on HCC cell proliferation.
Yoshiji et al[38]BALB/c mice injected with HCC cell lines. Endothelial cell culturesRetroviral tetracycline up-regulated VEGF gene expression and Perindopril (ACE-I)Perindopril significantly attenuated VEGF-mediated tumor growth and neovascularization. In vitro, VEGF-induced endothelial cell migration inhibitionSuppression of VEGF
Yoshiji et al[39]BALB/c mice injected with HCC cell lines. BNL CL2 cell lineCaptopril Perindopril Temocapril Losartan CandesartanReduction of tubular formation and microvessel density in the tumor. Higher VEGF mRNA expression reduction and HCC growth inhibition by perindopril compared to temocapril and captopril. Neither candesartan nor losartan significantly inhibited the tumor developmentACE-Is suppressed the tumor development mainly by a mechanism which was independent from AT1-R blockage.
Tamaki et al[40]Male Wistar rats receiving modified choline-deficient low-methionine dietTelmisartanNo HCC in telmisartan group vs 54.6% of HCC in control group. Telmisartan inhibited the dietary-induced up-regulation of VEGF, TGF-β1, CTGF, HIF1α and TNF-α mRNA levelsTelmisartan may prevent hepatocarcinogenesis through the inhibition of hepatic angiogenesis
Noguchi et al[41]Male Fisher-344 rats receiving modified choline-deficient low-methionine dietPerindopril Eplerenone (selective aldosterone blocker) AldosteroneSignificant inhibitory effects on the GST-P positive pre-neoplastic lesion development; reduction of VEGF expression tubule formation and neovascularizationCombination of Perindopril + Eplerenone exerted a stronger suppression than single treatment
Yoshiji et al[42]Male OLETF rats (spontaneous development of insulin resistance) treated with Diethylnitrosaminebranched-chain amino acids perindoprilNumber/size of preneoplastic foci were significantly suppressed by treatment of both drugs suppression of CD31- and VEGF-mRNAIn vitro suppression of tubule formation, regardless of drug concentration
Oura et al[43]Five human HCC cell lines (HepG2, HLF, HLE, HuH-7 and PLC/PRF/5)TelmisartanOnly telmisartan reduced proliferation in most of cell lines. Promotion of apoptosis, Enhancement of bFGF reduction of p-ErbB3Arrest of cell cycle in G1, and S phase. Effect is dose-dependent and may be mediated by induction of MPK/mTOR signaling.
Valsartan
Irbesartan
Losartan
Santhekadur et al[44]Hep3B and QGY-7703 cell linesLosartanSND1 increases AT1R level by augmenting AT1R mRNA stability; Losartan inhibited both cell migration and invasionSND1 induces TGF-β expression through AT1R signaling
Cook et al[45]H4-II-E-C3 rat hepatoma cells transfected with Ang IILosartan CandesartanLosartan inhibits Angiotensin II-induced proliferationBoth losartan and candesartan are equally effective in competing with Ang II/AT1 receptor interactions on the cell surface