Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2018; 24(47): 5312-5321
Published online Dec 21, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i47.5312
Published online Dec 21, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i47.5312
Table 1 Recently published formulae to calculate the liver volume
Ref. | Formula | Patient group | Technique |
Urata et al[20], 1995 | LV (mL) = 706.2 × BSA (m2) + 2.4 | 96 patients (65 pediatric) | CT |
Vauthey et al[21], 2002 | Based on BSA: | 292 adults | CT |
LV = -794.41 + 1267.28 × BSA (m2) | |||
r2 = 0.46; P < 0.0001 | |||
Based on patient weight: | |||
LV = 191.80 + 18.51 × body weight (kg) | |||
r2 = 0.49; P < 0.0001 | |||
Heinemann et al[17], 1999 | LV (mL) = 1072.8 × BSA (m2) - 345.7 | 1332 patients | Autopsy |
Kokudo et al[19], 2015 | LV = 203.3 - (3.61 × age) + [58.7 × thoracic width (cm)] - [463.7 × race (1 = Asian, 0 = Caucasian)] | 180 Japanese and 160 Swiss patients | CT |
Herden et al[18], 2013 | Children 0 to ≤ 1 yr: | 388 pediatrics | Autopsy |
LV (mL) = 143.062973 + 4.274603051 × body length (cm) + 14.78817631 × body weight (kg) | |||
Children > 1 yr to < 16 yr: | |||
LV (mL) = 20.2472281 + 3.339056437 × body length (cm) + 13.11312561 × body weight (kg) |
Table 2 Criteria and rates of split liver transplantation in different transplant programs according to the transplant programs homepages
Program | Rate of SLT | Donor age | Weight/BMI | Transaminases | Other criteria |
UNOS | 1%-4% (but according to UNOS criteria > 10% eligible) | < 40 | < 28 kg/m2 | < 3 × ULN | Single vasopressor |
ET | 6% | < 50 | > 50 kg | ||
United Kingdom | 10.6% | < 40 | > 50 kg | < 5 d ICU | |
Argentina/Brazil | 10% | < 47 | umbilical perimeter < 92 cm | AST < 42 U/L | |
ALT < 29 U/L | |||||
Oceania | 6% | ||||
Scandia-transplant | ? | < 51 | < 26 kg/m2 | ALT/AST < 3 × normal | < 4 d ICU |
Saudi-Arabia | 5.6% | ||||
South Africa | 3% | ||||
Japan | 1.8% | ||||
Italy | 8% (Northern Italy: 20%) | < 60 | Near-normal liver function tests | < 5 d ICU Low inotropic support |
Table 3 Numbers of liver transplantations, living-donor liver transplantations, deceased donor liver transplantations, and split liver transplantations and the rate of split liver transplantation in deceased donor liver transplantation performed in different transplant programs in 2016 according to the International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation
Total number | Living donors | Deceased donors | Split-liver | Split-liver (%) | |
UNOS | 8082 | 367 | 7715 | 0 | 0 |
Eurotransplant | |||||
Germany | 821 | 61 | 760 | 74 | 9.01 |
Austria | 154 | 2 | 152 | 6 | 3.90 |
Croatia | 121 | 0 | 121 | 0 | 0 |
Netherlands | 147 | 0 | 147 | 0 | 0 |
Belgium | 302 | 46 | 256 | 1 | 0.33 |
Luxemburg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hungary | 74 | 0 | 74 | 0 | 0 |
Slovenia | 27 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
Scandiatransplant | 0 | ||||
Sweden | 199 | 2 | 197 | 0 | 0 |
Norway | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Finland | 61 | 0 | 61 | 0 | 0 |
Iceland | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Denmark | 57 | 0 | 57 | 0 | 0 |
China | - | - | - | - | |
India | - | - | - | - | |
Japan | 438 | 381 | 57 | 8 | 1.83 |
South Korea | 1473 | 965 | 508 | 36 | 2.44 |
Australia | 314 | 2 | 312 | 65 | 20.70 |
Brazil | 2037 | 157 | 1880 | 0 | 0 |
Argentina | 349 | 37 | 312 | 0 | 0 |
Mexico | 178 | 3 | 175 | 0 | 0 |
Canada | 582 | 73 | 509 | 0 | 0 |
South Africa | 69 | 15 | 54 | 2 | 2.90 |
United Kingdom | 953 | 32 | 921 | 101 | 10.60 |
France | 1317 | 5 | 1312 | 0 | 0 |
Spain | 1159 | 28 | 1131 | 0 | 0 |
Italy | 1220 | 7 | 1213 | 98 | 8.03 |
Poland | 345 | 28 | 317 | 0 | 0 |
Czech Republic | 179 | 1 | 178 | 0 | 0 |
Balttransplant | 33 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 0 |
- Citation: Hackl C, Schmidt KM, Süsal C, Döhler B, Zidek M, Schlitt HJ. Split liver transplantation: Current developments. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(47): 5312-5321
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i47/5312.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i47.5312