Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2018; 24(46): 5288-5296
Published online Dec 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i46.5288
Table 1 Comparative baseline demographics and phenotypic characteristics of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in both groups n (%)
Prospective cohort95%CIRetrospective cohort95%CIP value
Characteristics (n = 98)
Sexmen51 (52)41.6-62.456 (57.1)46.8-67.4
women47 (48)37.6-58.442 (42.9)32.5-53.20.280
Smoking statusNever67 (68.3)58.7-78.169 (70.4)60.9-79.9
Previous18 (18.4)10.2-26.516 (16.3)8.5-24.10.929
Current13 (13.3)6.0-20.513 (13.3)6.1-20.5
Crohn’s disease (n = 67)
Age at diagnosisA1 (< 17)7 (10.5)2.4-18.510 (15)5.6-24.2
A2 (17-40)49 (73.1)61.8-84.548 (71.6)60.1; 83.20.691
A3 ( > 40)11 (16.4)6.8-26.09 (13.4)4.5; 22.3
Location at diagnosisL1 (ileal)18 (26.9)15.5-38.215 (22.4)11.7-33.1
L2 (colonic)26 (38.8)26.4-51.225 (37.3)25.0-49.60.887
L3 (ileocolonic)21 (31.3)19.5-43.225 (37.3)25.0-49.6
L4 (upper gastrointestinal tract)2 (3.0)0.3-10.42 (3.0)0.4-10.4
Disease behaviorB1 (non-stricturing, non-penetrating)38 (56.7)44.169.339 (58.2)45.7-70.80.860
B2 (stricturing)14 (20.9)10.4-31.413 (19.4)9.2-29.6
B3 (penetrating)15 (22.4)11.7-33.115 (22.4)11.7-33.1
Perianal diseaseYes37 (55.2)42.6-67.939 (58.2)45.7-70.80.727
Extraintestinal manifestationsNo42 (62.7)50.4-75.046 (68.7)56.8-80.50.466
Ulcerative colitis (n = 31)
Extension
E1 (proctitis)13 (41.9)22.9-60.912 (38.7)19.9-57.5
E2 (left colitis)10 (32.3)14,2-50.311 (35.5)17.0-53.90.957
E3 (pancolitis)8 (25.8)8.8-42.98 (25.8)8.8-42.9
SeverityS1 (mild)11 (35.5)17.0-53.910 (32.3)14.2-50.3
S2 (moderate)16 (51.6)32.4-70.817 (54.8)35.7-74.00.962
S3 (severe)4 (12.9)3.6-29.84 (12.9)3.6-29.8
Extraintestinal manifestationsNo26 (83.9)66.3-94.527 (87.1)66.3-94.50.500
Prior treatment75 (76.5)67.6-85.485 (86.7)79.5-940.097
Thiopurines25 (25.5)16.4-34.725 (25.5)16.4-34.70.970
Methotrexate
Concomitant treatment50 (51)40.6-61.440 (40.8)30.6-51.10.197
Thiopurines8 (8)2.2-14.17 (7,1)1.1-10,10.999
Methotrexate
Table 2 Comparison of efficacy and loss of efficacy in both groups
Infliximab original Group95%CICT-P13 Group95%CIP valueRate difference (95%CI)
Basal global remission76/98 (77.6%)66.8-86.381/98 (82.7%)74.6-90.70.474-0.173-0.071
Global remission 12 mo66/93 (71%)61.2-80.760/88 (68.2%)51.1-71.40.806-0.117-0.173
Basal remission CD51/67 (76.1%)65.2-87.156/67 (83.6%)73.9-93.20.389-0.225-0.076
Remission 12 mo CD45/65 (69.2%)57.2-81.242/62 (67.7%)55.3-80.20.992-0.163-0.192
Basal UC remission25/31 (80.6%)62.5-92.525/31 (80.6%)62.5-92.50.748-0.29-0.229
Remission 12 mo UC21/28 (75%)57.2-92.818/26 (69.2%)49.6-88.90.866-0.219-0.334
Table 3 Comparative of maintenance of remission at 12 mo in patients with initial remission in both groups
Infliximab original group95%CICT-P13group95%CIP valueRate Difference (95%CI)
Maintained basal remission at 12 mo62/74 (83.7%)74.7-92.954/74 (72.9%)62.2-83.50.162-0.037-0.253
Maintained basal remission at 12 mo CD42/51 (82.3%)70.9-93.837/53 (69.8%)56.5-83.10.205-0.056-0.307
Maintained basal remission at 12 mo UC20/23 (87%)66.4-97.217/21 (81.0%)62.5-92.50.890-0.203-0.23

  • Citation: Guerra Veloz MF, Argüelles-Arias F, Castro Laria L, Maldonado Pérez B, Benítez Roldan A, Perea Amarillo R, Merino Bohórquez V, Calleja MA, Caunedo Álvarez Á, Vilches Arenas Á. Loss of efficacy and safety of the switch from infliximab original to infliximab biosimilar (CT-P13) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(46): 5288-5296
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i46/5288.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i46.5288