Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2018; 24(32): 3626-3636
Published online Aug 28, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i32.3626
Published online Aug 28, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i32.3626
Table 1 Expanded criteria used for liver transplantation
Criteria | Type of donor | Detailed criteria |
UCSF[9,27] | Cadaveric | Solitary tumor ≤ 6.5 cm or ≤ 3 tumors with the largest ≤ 4.5 cm |
Up-to-seven[10] | Cadaveric/LDLT | Seven: sum of tumor number and size of the largest tumor without microvascular invasion |
Clinica Universidad de Navara (CUN)[12] | Cadaveric | 1 tumor ≤ 6 cm or ≤ 3 tumors with the largest ≤ 5 cm |
Toso[29] | Cadaveric | Total tumor volume ≤ 115 cm3 and AFP ≤ 400 ng/mL |
Hangzhou University[13] | Cadaveric | One of the following: Total tumor diameter ≤ 8 cm Total tumor diameter > 8 cm with histological grade I or II and AFP ≤ 400 ng/mL |
Onaca (ITR)[32] | Cadaveric | Solitary tumor, ≤ 6 cm 2-4 tumors, ≤ 5 cm |
Tokyo (5-5 rule)[53] | LDLT | Maximum 5 tumors ≤ 5 cm |
Kyoto[55] | LDLT | ≤ 10 tumors, ≤ 5 cm, DCP§ ≤ 400 mAU/mL |
Kyushu University[57] | LDLT | Any number of tumors with diameter ≤ 5 cm or DCP§ ≤ 300 mAU/mL |
Asan[58] | LDLT | ≤ 6 tumors, diameter ≤ 5 cm |
Samsung[59] | LDLT/cadaveric | ≤ 7 tumors, diameter ≤ 6 cm, AFP ≤ 1000 ng/mL |
BCLC[14] | LDLT | 1 tumor, ≤ 7 cm 3 tumors, ≤ 5 cm 5 tumors, ≤ 3 cm Maintained response within Milan criteria during 6 mo after downstaging |
Table 2 Results after liver transplantation with expanded criteria
Ref. | Type | Patients,n (type) | Criteria (findings) | Survival,time (%) | Recurrence,time (%) | Factorsfor survival | Factorsfor recurrence |
Yao et al[9], 2001 | R | 14 (MO) | UCSF (Histol) | 5 yr (84.6) | - | pT4, total tumor diameter | - |
Yao et al[27], 2007 | P | 38 (MO) | UCSF (Radiol) | 5 yr DFS (93.6) | UCSF Vascular invasion AFP > 1000 ng/mL | ||
Onaca et al[32], 2007 | R | 129 (MO) | Onaca | 5 yr DFS (63.9) | Tumor > 6 cm AFP > 200 ng/mL Tumors > 4 | ||
Herrero et al[28], 2008 | P | 26 (MO) | CUN (Radiol) | 5 yr (73) 5 yr I-to-T (68) | Vascular invasion | ||
Zheng et al[13], 2008 | R | 99 (MI and MO), 26 (MO) | Hangzhou (Histol) | 5 yr (70.7) | 5 yr DFS (62.4) | Macrovascular invasion Tumor size > 8 cm AFP > 400 ng/mL Histological grading (III) | Macrovascular invasion Tumor size > 8 cm AFP > 400 ng/mL Histological grading (III) |
Mazzaferro et al[10], 2009 | R | 283 (MI and MO) | Up-to-seven (Histol) | 5 yr (71.2) | - | Microvascular invasion Tumor grade | - |
Toso et al[29], 2015 | P | 38 (MO) | Toso (Radiol) | 4 yr (74.6) 4 yr I-to-T (53.8) | 4 yr DFS (68) | - | - |
Togashi et al[54], 2016 | R | 14 (MO) | Tokyo | - | 5 yr (8) | - | Tokyo criteria AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL DCP ≥ 200 mAU/mL |
Kaido et al[56], 2013 | R | 42 (MO) | Kyoto | 5 yr (80) | 5 yr (7) | Kyoto criteria Pretreatment of the HCC | |
Shirabe et al[57], 2011 | R | 48 (MI and MO) | Kyushu (Histol) | 5 yr DFS (80) | Kyushu criteria | ||
Lee et al[58], 2008 | R | 174 (MI and MO) | Asan (Histol) | 5 yr (81.6) | 5 yr (15) | Largest tumor > 5 cm Number > 6 Gross vascular invasion | Largest tumor > 5 cm Number > 6 Gross vascular invasion |
Kim et al[59], 2014 | R | 180 (in the whole study, including Samsung-out) | Samsung (Histol) | 5 yr DFS -89.6 | Tumors ≤ 7 Diameter ≤ 6 cm AFP ≤ 1000 ng/mL | ||
Llovet et al[14], 2018 | P | 22 | BCLC (Radiol) | 5 yr (80.2) | 5 yr (23.8) | MI after locoregional therapies |
Table 3 Prospective studies of downstaging of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation
Ref. | Criteria | Downstagingsuccess rate (%) | LT rate(%) | Survival,time and rate (%) | HCC recurrence (%) |
Roayaie et al[11], 2002 | Mount Sinai protocol | 53.75 | 5 yr OS (44) 5 yr DFS (48) 5 yr DFS, tumors < 7 cm (55) | ||
Yao et al[72], 2015 | Beyond Milan: single tumor ≤ 8 cm, 2–3 tumors (at least one > 3 and ≤ 5 cm, total diameter ≤ 8 cm), 4–5 tumors each ≤ 3 cm and total diameter ≤ 8 cm | To MC: 65.3 | 54.2 | 5 yr OS (77.8) 5 yr I-to-T (56.1) | 7.8 |
Bologna criteria - Ravaioli et al[35], 2008 | Beyond Milan: 1 lesion ≤ 6 cm, 2 lesions ≤ 5 cm, 3–5 lesions ≤ 4 cm and total diameter ≤ 12 cm | To MC: 72.9 | 66.7 | 3 yr DFS (71) 3 yr I-to-T (56.3) | 18.8 |
Millonig et al[73], 2007 | UCSF | RECIST | 84.8 | 5 yr CR (66.6); PR (63.7); NR (25) | 25 |
Graziadei et al[37], 2003 | Beyond Milan, no upper limit | Partial response (> 50% of tumor size) | 66.6 | 4 yr OS (41); 5 yr I-to-T (31) | 30 |
Table 4 Impact of genetic and molecular factors in post-liver transplantation outcome
Ref. | Criteria | Survival, time and rate (%) | Recurrence, time and rate (%) |
Schwartz et al[68], 2008 | FAI < 0.27 | 5 yr (10) | |
Dvorchick et al[69], 2008 | FAI and macrovascular invasion (Pittsburg criteria) | Stage I (FAI ≤ 20% and no macrovascular invasion) - 5 yr DFS (92.8) | |
Miltiadous et al[67], 2015 | Progenitor cell markers (CK19 or S2 signature) | 5 yr (67) | 5 yr (19) |
Sugimachi et al[70], 2015 | miR-718 and his target gene HOXB8 | 5 yr (≈ 80) | |
Barry et al[71], 2012 | 67 miRNA | ||
Liese et al[72], 2016 | miR-214, miR-3187 and MC | 5 yr DFS (≈ 90) |
- Citation: Pavel MC, Fuster J. Expansion of the hepatocellular carcinoma Milan criteria in liver transplantation: Future directions. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(32): 3626-3636
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i32/3626.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i32.3626