Leoni S, Tovoli F, Napoli L, Serio I, Ferri S, Bolondi L. Current guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(30): 3361-3373 [PMID: 30122876 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i30.3361]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Simona Leoni, MD, PhD, Doctor, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Division of Internal Medicine, University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, Bologna 40138, Italy. simona.leoni@aosp.bo.it
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Minireviews
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 3 Comparison of recommendations about non-invasive evaluation of fibrosis and follow up strategies
EASL
NICE
Asia-Pacific
AISF
AASLD
Non-invasive evaluation
NFS and FIB-4 upon diagnosis. If inconclusive, perform transient elastography
ELF blood test
Combination of serum tests and imaging tools (no specification about the preferred tests)
NFS + FIB-4 upon diagnosis. If inconclusive, perform transient elastography
NFS, FIB-4 and transient elastography (or MRE) upon diagnosis
Follow up
Negative markers > reassess every 2 yr; Fibrosis or abnormal liver enzymes > reassess every year; Cirrhosis-> surveillance every 6 mo
Negative ELF test, > reassess every 3 yr; Positive ELF test > liver biopsy
No information provided
Negative markers > reassess every 2 yr; Fibrosis or abnormal liver enzymes > reassess every year; Cirrhosis > surveillance every 6 mo
No information provided
Table 4 Guidance statements about lifestyle interventions
EASL
NICE
Asia-Pacific
AISF
AASLD
Dietary restrictions
500-1000 kcal deficit; weight loss of 500-1000 g/wk with a 7%-10% total weight loss
Main recommendations on diet of NICE’s obesity and preventing excess weight gain guidelines
500-1000 kcal deficit
1200-1600 kcal/d; fat-low (< 30% of total calories); carbohydrate-low (< 50% of total calories)
500-1000 kcal deficit
Physical activity
Aerobic and resistance training (150-200 min/wk in 3-5 sessions)
Main recommendation of on physical activity of NICE’s obesity and preventing excess weight gain guidelines
Aerobic and resistance training
Aerobic and resistance training
Aerobic and resistance training (> 150 min/wk)
Gold standard diet
Low-to-moderate fat and moderate-to-high carbohydrate intake
No specific suggestions
All, excluding very low-calorie diets
Mediterranean diet
No specific suggestions
Low-carbohydrate ketogenic diets or high-protein
Mediterranean diet
Table 5 Recommendations about pharmacological treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
EASL
NICE
ASIA-PACIFIC
AISF
AASLD
Metformin
Insufficient evidence
Not beneficial
Not beneficial
Not mentioned
Not beneficial
Vitamin E
Insufficient evidence
Consider use regardless of diabetes
Not beneficial
Insufficient evidence
Consider use in non-diabetic, biopsy-proven NASH
PPAR-gamma agonists
Consider use in selected diabetic patients
Consider pioglitazone in adults regardless of diabetes
Insufficient evidence in Asian
Insufficient evidence, potentially useful
Pioglitazone indicated in biopsy-proven NASH (regardless of diabetes)
PUFA
Not beneficial
Insufficient evidence
Not beneficial
Not mentioned
Not beneficial
Pentoxifylline
Insufficient evidence
Not mentioned
Not beneficial
Not mentioned
Not mentioned
GLP-1 analogues
Insufficient evidence, potentially useful
Insufficient evidence
Insufficient evidence in Asian patients
Insufficient evidence, potentially useful
Insufficient evidence
UDCA
Not beneficial
Not beneficial
Not mentioned
Not mentioned
Not beneficial
Obetycolic acid
Scarce evidence
Not mentioned
waiting for ongoing RCT results
Waiting for ongoing RCT results
Insufficient evidence
Silymarin
Not mentioned
Not mentioned
insufficient evidence, potentially useful
Not mentioned
Not mentioned
Statins
Safe but not beneficial
Safe but not beneficial
Safe but not beneficial
Safe but not beneficial
Safe but not beneficial
Citation: Leoni S, Tovoli F, Napoli L, Serio I, Ferri S, Bolondi L. Current guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(30): 3361-3373