Minimally invasive donor hepatectomy, are we ready for prime time?

doi:10.3748/wjg.v24.i25.2698

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 24, Issue 25

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (7011)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

496

WORD

266

HTML

3782

Tables (1-5)

461

Sum=5005

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

860

Download

1146

Sum=2006

Jul 7, 2018 (publication date) through Jan 21, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (27)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Minireviews

World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2018; 24(25): 2698-2709
Published online Jul 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i25.2698

Table 1 Outcomes of hand-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted donor hepatectomy

	LLS	Left	Right	OT (min)	Blood loss (mL)	WIT (min)	HS (d)	Donor Cx	Recipient Cx
Hand-assisted
Suh et al[42], 2009			2	765-898	-	-	10-14	2 (100%)^a	2 (100%)^b
Hybrid
Comparative study
Kurosaki et al[44], 2006^c		10/12	3/1	363 ± 33/320 ± 68	302 ± 191/283 ± 371	3	11.0 ± 2.7/12.8 ± 4.9	-	^d
Baker et al[45], 2009			33/33	265 ± 58¹/316 ± 61	417 ± 217/550 ± 305	-	4.3/3.9	7 (21.2%)^e	-
Thenappan et al[46], 2011^f	8/7			312 ± 68/324 ± 106	1033 ± 1096/733 ± 457	-	6.0 ± 2.0/6.4 ± 3.7	2 (13.3%)^g	7 (46.7%)^h
Choi et al[48], 2012ⁱ			40/20/90	279 ± 72/384 ± 42¹/303 ± 61	450 ± 316/870 ± 653¹/532 ± 323	-	11.8 ± 4.5/12.1 ± 2.8/12.0 ± 3.6	5 (12.5%)^j/6 (30.0%)^k	-
Marubashi et al[49], 2013^l	17/32	14/47		435 ± 103¹/383 ± 73	353 ± 396/456 ± 347		10.3 ± 3.3¹/18.3 ± 16.7	3 (9.7%)^m	-
Nagai et al[55], 2012ⁿ			19/30	371 ± 52/363 ± 53	212 ± 114¹/316 ± 121	-	5.9 ± 1.2¹/7.8 ± 2.3	7 (25.0%)^o	10 (35.7%)^p
Makki et al[50], 2014			26/24	703 ± 124/675 ± 118	337 ± 89/396 ± 126	-	-	4 (15.4%)^q	2 (7.8%)^r
Shen et al[51], 2016^s			28/20	386 ± 49/366 ± 45	384 ± 180/416 ± 164	3.0 ± 1.6/2.9 ± 1.5	7.4 ± 2.5/7.3 ± 1.6	5 (17.9%)^t	-
Kitajima et al[52], 2017		35/38		459 (310-633)¹/403 (256-597)	245 (22-1840)/400 (20-1638)	-	12 (7-50)/12 (8-31)	8 (22.9%)^u	13 (17.1%)^v
Kitajima et al[52], 2017			41/39	431 (310-651)/402 (315-588)	201 (10-1559)¹/313 (55-2165)	-	12 (8-27)/ 12 (7-40)	9 (22.0%)^w
Case series
Koffron et al[43], 2006			1	235	150	-	3	0	0
Suh et al[42], 2009			7	310-575	-	-	8-17	4 (57.1%)^x	5 (71.4%)^y
Soyama et al[47], 2012		9	6	456 (328-581)	520 (230-1000)	-	-	1 (6.7%)^z	-

¹Statistically significant;

^aIntra-abdominal collection and pleural effusion in both patients;

^bBiliary stricture and stroke in one patient and bile leak and biliary stricture in the other patient;

^cCombined results of left and right hepatectomy;

^dThree (23%) early graft loss within 2 mo;

^eSmall bowel injury (n = 1), biloma (n = 1) and other complications (n = 3);

^fCombined results of 15 hybrid and mini-laparotomy compared with 15 open operations, types of graft other than left lateral section not specified;

^gBile leak (n = 1) and incisional hernia (n = 1);

^hBile leak (n = 2), vascular complications (n = 3), intra-abdominal collection (n = 1) and chylous ascites (n = 1);

ⁱSingle-port laparoscopic-assisted (n = 40) vs laparoscopic-assisted (n = 20) vs open (n = 90);

^jIntra-abdominal bleeding (n = 2), bile leak (n = 3) and pleural effusion (n = 1);

^kWound complication (n = 2), diaphragmatic hernia (n = 1), pleural effusion (n = 2) and biliary stricture (n = 1);

^lCombined results of donor left lateral sectionectomy and left hepatectomy;

^mDelayed gastric emptying requiring endoscopy (n = 2) and grade I complication (n = 1);

ⁿCombined results of 19 hybrid and 9 mini-laparotomies compared with 30 open operations;

^oIntra-abdominal bleeding (n = 1), bile leak (n = 1), intra-abdominal collection (n = 1), ileus (n = 2), deep vein thrombosis (n = 1) and phlebitis (n = 1);

^pBile leak (n = 2), biliary stricture (n = 2), hepatic artery stricture (n = 2), hepatic vein stricture (n = 2) and intra-abdominal collection (n = 2);

^qPleural effusion requiring tapping (n = 1) and grade I complications (n = 3);

^rBile leak (n = 1) and biliary stricture (n = 1);

^sLaparoscopic-assisted (n = 28) compared against mini-laparotomy (n = 20);

^tIntra-abdominal bleeding (n = 1), ileus (n = 1), pneumonia (n = 1) and pleural effusion (n = 2);

^uBile leak (n = 3), intra-abdominal collection (n = 1), pneumonia (n = 1) and grade I complications (n = 3);

^vCombined results of left and right hepatectomy; bile leak (n = 5), biliary stricture (n = 5), portal vein thrombosis (n = 2), arterial complication (n = 1);

^wFever of unknown origin (n = 2), renal failure (n = 1), small bowel obstruction (n = 1) and grade I complications (n = 5);

^xBile leak (n = 1), intra-abdominal collection (n = 1) and pleural effusion (n = 3);

^yBile leak (n = 1), portal vein thrombosis (n = 1) and biliary stricture (n = 3);

^zPortal vein thrombosis. Cx: Complications; HS: Hospital stay; LLS: Left lateral section; OT: Operating time; WIT: Warm ischaemic time.

Table 2 Outcomes of donor hepatectomy with mini-laparotomy

	LLS	Left	Right	OT (min)	Blood loss (mL)	WIT (min)	HS (d)	Donor Cx	Recipient Cx
Comparative study
Kim et al[53], 2009			23/23	232 ± 29¹/269 ± 37	186 ± 59/218 ± 67	-	10 ± 3/12 ± 4	3 (13.0%)^a	1 (4.3%)^b
Thenappan et al[46], 2011^c	8/7	-	-	312 ± 68/324 ± 106	1033 ± 1096/733 ± 457	-	6.0 ± 2.0/6.4 ± 3.7	2 (13.3%)^d	7 (46.7%)^e
Nagai et al[55], 2012^f			9/30	371 ± 52/363 ± 53	212 ± 114¹/316 ± 121	-	5.9 ± 1.2¹/7.8 ± 2.3	7 (25.0%)^g	10 (35.7%)^h
Shen et al[51], 2016ⁱ			20/28	366 ± 45/386 ± 50	416 ± 164/383 ± 180	2.9 ± 1.5/3.0 ± 1.6	7.3 ± 1.6/7.4 ± 2.5	1 (5.0%)^j
Case series
Lee et al[54], 2011			141	254 ± 47	352 ± 144	-	10 ± 3	25 (17.7%)^k	51 (36.2%)^l

¹Statistically significant;

^aIntra-abdominal bleeding (n = 2) and pleural effusion (n = 1);

^bBile leak requiring laparotomy (n = 1);

^cCombined results of 15 hybrid and mini-laparotomy compared with 15 open operations, types of graft other than left lateral section not specified;

^dBile leak (n=1) and incisional hernia (n = 1);

^eBile leak (n = 2), vascular complications (n = 3), intra-abdominal collection (n = 1) and chylous ascites (n = 1);

^fCombined results of 19 hybrid and 9 mini-laparotomies compared with 30 open operations;

^gIntra-abdominal bleeding (n = 1), bile leak (n = 1), intra-abdominal collection (n = 1), ileus (n = 2), deep vein thrombosis (n = 1) and phlebitis (n = 1);

^hBile leak (n = 2), biliary stricture (n = 2), hepatic artery stricture (n = 2), hepatic vein stricture (n = 2) and intra-abdominal collection (n = 2);

ⁱMini-laparotomy (n = 20) compared against laparoscopic-assisted (n = 28);

^jPneumonia;

^kRhabdomyolysis (n = 1), intra-abdominal bleeding (n = 4), bile leak (n = 4), ileus (n = 2) and grade I complications (n = 14);

^lBiliary complications (n = 36), intra-abdominal bleeding (n = 5) and vascular complications (n = 6). Cx: Complications; HS: Hospital stay; LLS: Left lateral section; OT: Operating time; WIT: Warm ischaemic time.

Table 3 Outcomes of pure laparoscopic donor left lateral sectionectomy

	No.	OT (min)	Blood loss (mL)	WIT (min)	Conversion	HS (d)	Donor Cx	Recipient Cx
Comparative study
Soubrane et al[28], 2006	16/14	320 ± 67¹/224 ± 15	19 ± 44¹/99 ± 185	10 (6-12)/5(2-7)	1 (6.3%)	7.5 ± 2.3/8.1 ± 3.0	3 (18.7%)^a/5 (35.7%)	6 (37.5%)^b/6 (42.8%)
Kim et al[61], 2011	11/11	330 ± 68/306 ± 29	396 ± 72/464 ± 78	6 ± 2/5 ± 1	0	6.9 ± 0.3¹/9.8 ± 0.9	0/1 (9.1%)	2 (18.1%)^c/2 (18.1%)
Samstein et al[40], 2015^d	17/20	478 ± 68¹/398 ± 42	177 ± 101¹/375 ± 191	-	0	4.3 ± 1.5¹/6.0 ± 1.5	2 (9.1%)^e/5 (25%)	1 (4.5%)^f/1 (4.5%)
Case series
Cherqui et al[12], 2012	2	360-420	150-450	4-10	0	5-7	0	1 (50.0%)^g
Yu et al[92], 2012	15	331 ± 63	410 ± 71	6 ± 2	0	7.1 ± 0.8	0	-
Scatton et al[62], 2015^h	67	275 (175-520)	82 ± 79	9 ± 4	4 (5.7%)	6 (3-18)	17 (25.3%)ⁱ
Soubrane et al[63], 2015^j	124	308 (180-555)	50 (10-500)	8	5 (4.0%)	6.3 (2-18)	21 (16.9%)^k	-
Troisi et al[64], 2017	11	237 ± 99	70 ± 41	4	0%	4	2 (18.1%)^l	5 (45.4%)^m

¹Statistically significant;

^aBile leak requiring laparoscopy (n = 1) and wound haematoma (n = 2);

^bPortal vein thrombosis requiring re-transplant (n = 1), hepatic artery thrombosis (n = 2) and biliary stricture (n = 3);

^cPortal vein stenosis requiring stenting (n = 1) and biliary stricture (n = 1);

^dResults included 5 left hepatectomy and compared with mixed open and hybrid controls;

^eHernia (n = 1) and bile leak (n = 1);

^fPortal vein thrombosis requiring exploration (n = 1);

^gHepatic artery thrombosis (n = 1);

^hResults included 3 left hepatectomy;

ⁱBile leak (n = 2), biliary stricture (n = 1), pulmonary complications (n = 2), bladder injury (n = 1), and complications (n = 5);

^jCombined results of 5 centres;

^kBile leak (n = 3), wound haematoma requiring drainage (n = 1), bladder injury requiring cystoscopy (n = 1), fluid collection requiring drainage (n = 1), others: grade I-II complications;

^lHepatic necrosis (n = 1) and collection (n = 1)

^mFungemia leading to death (n = 1) and biliary stricture (n = 4). Cx: Complications; HS: Hospital stay; LLS: Left lateral section; OT: Operating time; WIT: Warm ischaemic time.

Table 4 Outcomes of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy

	No.	OT (min)	Blood loss (mL)	WIT (min)	Conversion	HS (d)	Donor Cx	Recipient Cx
Comparative study
Takahara et al[67], 2015	5/25	480 ± 54¹/380 ± 45	91 ± 69¹/268 ± 194	9	0	9.4 ± 1.8/9.0 ± 2.2	1 (20%)^a	-
Suh et al[37], 2018	45/42	331 ± 50¹/280 ± 40	436 ± 170¹/338 ± 188	12.6 ± 4.4¹/5.4 ± 3.6	0	8.2 ± 1.3/8.4 ± 1.0	5 (11.9%)^b	11 (26.2%)^c
Case series
Soubrane et al[13], 2013	1	480	100	12	0	7	0	0
Rotellar et al[32], 2013	1	480	100	3	0	4	0	1 (100%)^d
Han et al[33], 2015^e	2	-	-	-	9	9 (8-10)	-	-
Chen et al[39], 2015	1	415	150	6	0	6	1 (100%)^f	1 (100%)^g
Kim et al[36], 2017	3	427-502	200-270	4.5-5.0	0	7-8	0	0

¹Statistically significant;

^aBiliary complication;

^bLiver abscess (n = 1), Pneumonia (n = 1), upper respiratory tract infection (n = 1) and grade I complications (n = 2);

^cIntra-abdominal bleeding (n = 4), vascular complication (n = 4), biliary complication (n = 2) and others;

^dPneumonia;

^eVideo presentation;

^fWound haematoma;

^gPneumonia. Cx: Complications; HS: Hospital stay; OT: Operating time; WIT: Warm ischaemic time.

Table 5 Outcomes of pure laparoscopic donor left hepatectomy

	No.	OT (min)	Blood loss (mL)	WIT (min)	Conversion	HS (d)	Donor Cx	Recipient Cx
Comparative study
Samstein et al[40], 2015^a	5/20	478 ± 68¹/398 ± 42	177 ± 101¹/375 ± 191	-	0	4.3 ± 1.5¹/6.0 ± 1.5	2 (9.1%)^b/5 (25%)	1 (4.5%)^c/1 (4.5%)
Case series
Samstein et al[71], 2013	2	358-379	125	-	0	4 ± 1	0	1 (50%)^d
Troisi et al[72], 2013	4	370-560	50-80	4-7	0	4-6	0	1 (25%)e
Almodhaiberi et al[73], 2018	1	300	125	-	0	8	0	-

¹Statistically significant;

^aResults included 17 left lateral sectionectomies and compared with mixed open and hybrid controls;

^bHernia (n = 1) and bile leak (n = 1);

^cPortal vein thrombosis requiring exploration (n = 1);

^dBile leak (n = 1); ^eRecipient common hepatic artery dissection (n = 1). Cx: Complications; HS: Hospital stay; OT: Operating time; WIT: Warm ischaemic time.

Citation: Au KP, Chok KSH. Minimally invasive donor hepatectomy, are we ready for prime time? World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(25): 2698-2709
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i25/2698.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i25.2698