Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2018; 24(21): 2279-2290
Published online Jun 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i21.2279
Published online Jun 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i21.2279
Table 1 Characteristics of the patients before treatments
All n = 104 | Active n = 61 | Inactive n = 43 | P value | |
Gender (M/F) | 59/45 | 36/25 | 23/20 | 0.230 |
Age | 31.37 ± 9.56 | 27.5 ± 11.4 | 34.44 ± 5.37 | 0.650 |
Disease duration | 3.5 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 0.550 |
Disease location | ||||
Rectum | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Sigmoid/left colon | 4 | 2 | 2 | |
Transverse colon | 14 | 7 | 7 | |
Right colon | 16 | 10 | 6 | |
Ileum | 70 | 42 | 28 | |
Treatment regimen | ||||
Glucocorticoid | 23 | 23 | 0 | |
IFX | 18 | 18 | 0 | |
ADA | 20 | 20 | 0 | |
Edema | 61 | 61 | 0 | < 0.001 |
Reactive lymph nodes | 25 | 16 | 9 | 0.311 |
Mucosal ulcer | 49 | 38 | 11 | < 0.001 |
Enhancement pattern | 61 | 61 | 0 | 0.006 |
Morphological changes | 31 | 12 | 19 | 0.023 |
Perienteric exudation | 38 | 38 | 0 | < 0.001 |
CRP (mg/L) | 18.34 ± 8.45 | 25.12 ± 4.12 | 5.14 ± 0.98 | < 0.001 |
ADC (mm2/s) | 1.87 ± 0.471 | 1.598 ± 0.383 | 1.949 ± 0.431 | 0.001 |
Thickness (mm) | 7.89 ± 3.23 | 9.23 ± 3.36 | 6.75 ± 2.49 | 0.001 |
tRCE (%) | 78.34 ± 45.34 | 92.153 ± 101.34 | 40.592 ± 11.019 | 0.017 |
aRCE (%) | 124.45 ± 61.11 | 181.46 ± 97.80 | 92.63 ± 45.48 | < 0.001 |
pRCE (%) | 254.21 ± 198.22 | 321.90 ± 231.03 | 201.32 ± 124.66 | 0.020 |
dRCE (%) | 377.15 ± 223.21 | 466.18 ± 260.08 | 271.91 ± 209.66 | 0.002 |
MaRIA | ||||
tRCE | 20.37 ± 3.42 | 26.18 ± 5.02 | 6.44 ± 1.03 | < 0.001 |
aRCE | 18.88 ± 4.11 | 28.40 ± 4.84 | 6.43 ± 2.74 | < 0.001 |
pRCE | 26.32 ± 2.89 | 35.09 ± 4.64 | 6.94 ± 2.58 | < 0.001 |
dRCE | 19.26 ± 3.21 | 36.81 ± 5.11 | 7.25 ± 2.32 | 0.001 |
CDEIS | 8.15 ± 4.03 | 10.57 ± 3.02 | 3.46 ± 1.23 | 0.001 |
Table 2 Correlations between magnetic resonance indicators and Crohn’s disease endoscopic index of severity before treatment in the two groups
All n = 104 | Active group n = 61 | Inactive group n = 43 | ||||
r | P value | r | P value | r | P value | |
ADC | -0.276 | 0.012 | -0.207 | 0.016 | -0.202 | 0.356 |
Thickness | 0.356 | 0.001 | 0.311 | 0.002 | 0.952 | 0.013 |
tRCE | 0.661 | < 0.001 | 0.726 | < 0.001 | 0.718 | < 0.001 |
aRCE | 0.634 | < 0.001 | 0.548 | < 0.001 | 0.238 | 0.274 |
pRCE | 0.519 | < 0.001 | 0.540 | < 0.001 | 0.921 | 0.022 |
dRCE | 0.507 | < 0.001 | 0.459 | < 0.001 | 0.022 | 0.920 |
MaRIA | ||||||
tRCE | 0.772 | < 0.001 | 0.789 | < 0.001 | 0.746 | < 0.001 |
aRCE | 0.754 | < 0.001 | 0.767 | < 0.001 | 0.334 | 0.288 |
pRCE | 0.738 | < 0.001 | 0.745 | < 0.001 | 0.230 | 0.471 |
dRCE | 0.712 | < 0.001 | 0.718 | < 0.001 | 0.280 | 0.378 |
CDEIS | 8.15 ± 4.03 | 10.57 ± 3.02 | 3.46 ± 1.23 |
Table 3 Correlations between magnetic resonance imaging indicators and Crohn’s disease endoscopic index of severity in the 61 active Crohn’s disease patients after treatment
CDEIS | ΔCDEIS | ||||
r | P value | r | P value | ||
ADC | -0.467 | < 0.001 | ΔADC | -0.545 | 0.001 |
Thickness | 0.242 | 0.201 | Δthickness | 0.407 | 0.148 |
tRCE | 0.548 | 0.002 | ΔtRCE | 0.467 | 0.018 |
aRCE | 0.619 | < 0.001 | ΔaRCE | 0.593 | 0.002 |
pRCE | 0.493 | 0.008 | ΔpRCE | 0.529 | 0.004 |
dRCE | 0.490 | 0.015 | ΔdRCE | 0.512 | 0.003 |
MaRIA | ΔMaRIA | ||||
tRCE | 0.736 | < 0.001 | tRCE | 0.724 | < 0.001 |
aRCE | 0.771 | < 0.001 | aRCE | 0.781 | < 0.001 |
pRCE | 0.740 | < 0.001 | pRCE | 0.724 | < 0.001 |
dRCE | 0.755 | < 0.001 | dRCE | 0.760 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Subgroups in the active Crohn’s disease patients according to disease activity after treatments
Remained active (n = 17) | Improved to inactive (n = 44) | P value | |||
Pre-treatment | Post-treatment | Pre-treatment | Post-treatment | ||
Gender (M/F) | 10/7 | 26/18 | 0.332 | ||
Age | 30.4 ± 5.5 | 26.7 ± 10.1 | 0.563 | ||
Disease duration | 1-5 | 1-5 | |||
Disease location | 0.916 | ||||
Sigmoid/left colon | 1 | 1 | |||
Transverse colon | 3 | 4 | |||
Right colon | 4 | 6 | |||
Ileum | 14 | 28 | |||
Treatment regimen | 0.292 | ||||
Glucocorticoids | 8 | 15 | |||
Infliximab | 6 | 12 | |||
Adalimumab | 3 | 17 | |||
CRP | 28.01 ± 5.22 | 20.91 ± 5.45 | 0.054 | ||
CDEIS | 12.23 ± 5.12 | 10.47 ± 3.43 | 10.12 ± 2.11 | 3.11 ± 0.21 | 0.001 |
CRP | 28.01 ± 5.215 | 15.12 ± 4.32 | 20.91 ± 5.45 | 5.84 ± 0.743 | 0.002 |
ADC | 1.52 ± 0.12 | 1.44 ± 0.34 | 1.59 ± 0.17 | 1.73 ± 0.2 | 0.001 |
Thickness | 9.12 ± 1.21 | 7.66 ± 1.41 | 8.2 ± 2.22 | 5.42 ± 1.32 | 0.012 |
tRCE | 89.14 ± 13.33 | 69.49 ± 12.11 | 82.11 ± 12.47 | 45.32 ± 4.53 | 0.021 |
aRCE | 179.03 ± 20.66 | 166.16 ± 22.44 | 181.14 ± 34.1 | 89.76 ± 12.71 | 0.001 |
pRCE | 330.02 ± 67.12 | 285.27 ± 57.71 | 301.32 ± 54.12 | 199.23 ± 23.2 | 0.001 |
dRCE | 453.29 ± 54.05 | 385.5 ± 45.32 | 440.18 ± 33.09 | 257.22 ± 44.13 | 0.001 |
MaRIA | |||||
tREC | 35.17 ± 5.66 | 30.12 ± 3.12 | 26.56 ± 2.90 | 6.23 ± 1.11 | < 0.001 |
aRCE | 28.22 ± 6.76 | 19.12 ± 4.09 | 29.47 ± 5.22 | 6.48 ± 1.38 | < 0.001 |
pRCE | 37.79 ± 5.59 | 29.21 ± 4.21 | 36.28 ± 4.72 | 7.11 ± 1.74 | < 0.001 |
dRCE | 36.09 ± 8.12 | 25.2 ± 5.77 | 27.08 ± 5.79 | 7.22 ± 1.59 | < 0.001 |
ESR | 24.186 ± 3.210 | 18.28 ± 3.38 | 21.49 ± 3.33 | 3.184 ± 0.568 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Correlations between magnetic resonance indicators and Crohn’s disease endoscopic index of severity in the active group according to disease activity after treatment
Remained active n = 17 | Improved to inactive n = 44 | |||
r | P value | r | P value | |
ADC | -0.219 | 0.518 | -0.516 | 0.002 |
Thickness | 0.105 | 0.758 | 0.170 | 0.568 |
tRCE | 0.356 | 0.203 | 0.420 | 0.005 |
aRCE | 0.376 | 0.255 | 0.697 | 0.002 |
pRCE | 0.305 | 0.113 | 0.350 | 0.010 |
dRCE | 0.381 | 0.134 | 0.341 | 0.015 |
MaRIA | ||||
tRCE | 0.268 | 0.400 | 0.705 | < 0.001 |
aRCE | 0.268 | 0.399 | 0.712 | < 0.001 |
pRCE | 0.306 | 0.334 | 0.685 | < 0.001 |
dRCE | 0.309 | 0.329 | 0.634 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Zhu NY, Zhao XS, Miao F. Magnetic resonance imaging and Crohn’s disease endoscopic index of severity: Correlations and concordance. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(21): 2279-2290
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i21/2279.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i21.2279