Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2018; 24(1): 124-138
Published online Jan 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.124
Published online Jan 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.124
Table 1 Summarized recommendations for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals, published in North America between 2007 and 2017
Continent | Country/association | Publication year | Age | Screening tests recommended | Recommendation | Note |
North America | United States: ACG | 2009 | ≥ 50 | Preferred prevention test: Colonoscopy (10 yr). If not possible or refused by individual: FS (5-10 yr) - OR CTC (5 yr) OR detection test | Grade 1B except for FS (2B) and CTC(1C) | Screening starting at age 45 for African American population |
Preferred detection test: FIT (1 yr). If not possible: Annual gFOBT (Hemoccult Sensa) OR- Fecal DNA testing (3 yr) | FIT : Grade 1B | |||||
United States: ACP | 2015 | 50-75 | High sensitivity FOBT/FIT (1 year) OR FS (5 years) OR FOBT/FIT (3 yr) + FS (5 yr) OR colonoscopy (10 yr) | - | ||
≥ 75 and individuals whose life expectancy is estimated to less than 10 years | Screening not recommended | - | ||||
United States: USPSTF | 2016 | 50-75 | gFOBT/FIT (1 yr) OR FIT-DNA (1-3 yr) OR FS (10 yr) + FIT (1year) OR FS (5 yr) OR colonoscopy (10 yr) OR CT-colonoscopy (5 yr) | Grade A recommendation | ||
76-85 | Screening is considered an individual decision, | Grade C recommendation | ||||
Canada: CTFPHC | 2016 | 50-59 | gFOBT/FIT (2 yr) OR FS (10 yr) OR defer until age 60 | Weak recommendation; moderate-quality evidence | Colonoscopy not recommended for screening (weak recommendation; low-quality evidence), but could be discussed | |
60-74 | gFOBT/FIT (2 years) OR FS (10 yr) | Strong recommendation; moderate-quality evidence | ||||
≥ 75 | Screening not recommended, but can be discussed | Weak recommendation; low-quality evidence | ||||
United States: NCCN | 2017 | 50-75 | Colonoscopy (10 years) OR gFOBT/FIT (1 yr) OR Fecal DNA test (3 yr) OR FS (5-10 yr) (+/- gFOTB/FIT at year 3) OR CTC (5 yr) | Category 2A except for annual gFOBT and FS every 5-10 years (which are category 1) | FIT is identified as more sensitive than gFOBT | |
76-85 | Screening should be an individual decision, can be discussed | |||||
United States: US Multi-Society Task Force of Colorectal Cancer | 2017 | 50-75 | First-tier (preferred tests): Annual FIT OR colonoscopy (10 yr) | Strong recommendation; moderate-quality evidence | Screening for African American starting at age 45 (weak recommendation; very-low-quality evidence) | |
Second-tier: CTC (5 yr) OR FIT-fecal DNA testing (3 yr) OR FS (5-10 yr) | CTC and FIT-DNA : Strong recommendation; low-quality evidence | |||||
FS: Strong recommendation; high-quality evidence | ||||||
Third-tier: Capsule colonoscopy (5 yr) | Weak recommendation; low-quality evidence | |||||
76-85 | Screening should be considered for individuals without prior screening | Weak recommendation; low-quality evidence |
Table 2 Summarized recommendations for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals, published in Europe between 2007 and 2017
Continent | Country/Association | Year | Age | Screening tests recommended | Recommendation | Note |
Europe | Scotland: TIS | 2011 (revised in 2016) | Age not mentioned | FIT (quantitative) (interval not mentioned) | Grade A recommendation | Performance of FS unsure in the Scottish population. Colonoscopy and CT colonography are not recommended |
Germany: GGPO | 2014 | ≥ 50 | Preferred test: Colonoscopy (10 yr) If refused by individual: FS (5 yr) + annual FOBT OR Annual FOBT | Colonoscopy: Grade B recommendation; 3b level of evidence. FS: Grade B recommendation; 2b level of evidence. Adding FOBT to FS: Grade B recommendation; 3b level of evidence. FOBT as a screening test: Good clinical practice | General use of FIT is not recommended, but FIT can be used instead of gFOBT if it has a proven high specificity (> 90%) and sensitivity. Genetic stool tests, CT colonography, MR-colonography and capsule endoscopy are not recommended. | |
Spain: SEOM | 2014 | 50-74 | FIT every 2 yr OR, depending on available resources, annual or biennial gFOBT OR FS (5 yr) OR colonoscopy (every 10 yr) | Grade B (moderate) quality of evidence, except for FOBT every 2 yr (grade A quality of evidence) | Combination of gFOBT and FS, and CT colonography are not recommended | |
European Guidelines | 2013 | 50-74 | Recommended test: gFOBT/FIT (1-2 yr) | Recommendation based on good evidence for gFOBT, reasonable evidence for FIT and FS, and limited evidence for colonoscopy | Evidence supports FIT superiority compared to gFOBT | |
Other options include colonoscopy (10-20 yr) OR FS (10-20 yr) |
Table 3 Summarized recommendations for colorectal cancer screening in average risk individuals, published in Asia between 2007 and 2017
Continent | Country/region | Year | Age | Screening tests recommended | Recommendation | Note |
Asia | South Korea | 2012 | ≥ 50 | Colonoscopy (at least 5 years) is the priority OR FOBT (FIT) OR CTC OR DCBE | Colonoscopy (strong recommendation; low-quality evidence) with 5-year interval (weak recommendation; very low-quality evidence). FOBT (strong recommendation; moderate-quality evidence). CTC (strong recommendation; low-quality evidence). DCBE (weak recommendation; low-quality evidence) | FS efficacy is recognized, but FS not widely used because it doesn't explore entire colon, might need a colonoscopy after, and FS less preferred by individuals and physicians |
China | 2014 | 50-74 | FOBT (chemical FOBT or FIT) + Questionnaire every 3 yr | - | ||
Asia Pacific | 2015 | 50-75 | FIT (preferred choice) OR FS OR colonoscopy (intervals not mentioned) | A for FIT; A for FS; B for colonoscopy | FIT is preferred over gFOBT | |
Saudi Arabia | 2015 | 45-69 | Colonoscopy (10 yr) is the recommended modality; if not possible: FS (5 yr)+ FIT/gFOBT (1 yr) OR FS (3 yr) | Colonoscopy: Strong recommendation; low-quality evidence. FS: Strong recommendation; moderate-quality evidence. | FIT is preferred over gFOBT. FOBT used alone is not recommended, but could be used depending on availability of other modalities. | |
≥ 70 | Screening not recommended | Conditional recommendation; low-quality evidence | Screening for people over 70 could be beneficial in certain cases (depending on health status) |
Table 4 Recommended test in terms of available resources according to World Gastroenterology Organization’s colorectal cancer screening cascade
Level of recommendation | Recommended screening test |
1 | Colonoscopy every 10 yr |
2 | Colonoscopy, once in a lifetime |
3 | FS every 5 yr, followed by a colonoscopy if FS was positive |
4 | FS, once in a lifetime, followed by a colonoscopy if FS was positive |
5 | FS, once in a lifetime, followed by a colonoscopy only if advanced neoplasia is detected |
6 | Fecal blood test annually, followed, if positive, by a colonoscopy or barium enema (depending on colonoscopy’s availability) |
Table 5 Screening tests characteristics
Screening test | Specificity/sensitivity for advanced adenoma detection (%) | Specificity/sensitivity for CRC detection (%) | Price (USD) | Participation rates after first-time invitation (%)[56] | Decreased mortality for CRC (%) | Risk of complications (%)[63] |
gFOBT | 95.4/8.6[64] | 97.7/23.8[39] | 5[61]-23[60] | 47 | 14[65]-32[7] | 0 |
FIT | 96.8-97.4/20.3-25.7[64] | 94.0 79.0[66] | 23[60]-25[61] | 42 | 59[65] | 0 |
FS | 87.0/95.0[67] | 169[60]-238[61] | 35 | 33[65] - 50[10] | Perforation: 0.01 Major bleeds: 0.02 | |
Colonoscopy | 91.3/92.9 (for adenomas > 10 mm)[68] | 100.0/91.2[68] | 645[60]-803[61] | 28 | 61[65]- 65[48] | Perforation: 0.04 Major bleeds: 0.08 |
sDNA test | 89.81/42.4[69] | 89.81/92.3[69] | 150[61] | NR | NR | 0 |
CTC | 87.3/91.2 (for adenomas > 10 mm)[68] | 99.0/96.8[68] | 570[60] | 22 | NR | Perforation: Less than 0.02 |
- Citation: Bénard F, Barkun AN, Martel M, von Renteln D. Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: Summarizing the current global recommendations. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(1): 124-138
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i1/124.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.124