Systematic Reviews
Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2017; 23(9): 1697-1711
Published online Mar 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1697
Table 1 Glucose abnormalities and hepatitis C virus infection
Ref .Year Country Study design Patients Patients number Controls Controls number Testing for HCV Ab or RNA Endpoint Statistical methods Association Statistics HCV infection markers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus Sangiorgio et al [4 ] 2000 Italy Retrospective DM 1514 HV 1300 Ab HCV Univariate Yes P < 0.0001Chen et al [5 ] 2006 Taiwan Cross sectional DM 820 HV 905 Ab HCV Univariate adjusted Yes OR = 2.87 [1.51, 5.46]; P < 0.001 Huang et al [6 ] 2007 Taiwan Cross sectional DM 1237 HV 8595 RNA HCV Univariate Yes 6.9% vs 4.5%; P < 0.001 Jadoon et al [7 ] 2010 Pakistan ND DM 3000 HV 10000 Ab HCV Univariate Yes OR = 3.03 [2.64, 3.48]; P = 0.001 Balogun et al [53 ] 2006 Nigeria case-control DM 90 HV2 90 Ab HCV Univariate No NS Costa et al [54 ] 2008 Brazil Case-control DM 206 HV 206 RNA HCV Multivariate No NS Glucose abnormalities in HCV infected patients vs different control groups Vs healthy volunteersKnobler et al [17 ] 2000 Israel Case-control HCV 45 HV2 88 RNA DM Univariate Yes 33% vs 5.6%; P < 0.001 Mehta et al [8 ] 2000 United States Cross sectional HCV 230 HV 9611 Ab DM Multivariate Yes OR = 3.77 [1.8, 7.87] Marzouk et al [18 ] 2007 Egypt Cross sectional HCV 190 HV 575 RNA DM Multivariate Yes HR = 3.05 [1.19, 7.81] Shaheen et al [19 ] 2007 United States ND HCV 239 HV 10144 ND IR Univariate adjusted Yes OR = 1.68; P = 0.02 Huang et al [6 ] 2007 Taiwan Cross sectional HCV 478 HV2 7927 RNA DM Multivariate Yes OR = 1.53 [1.18, 1.98]; P <0.001 Huang et al [21 ] 2008 Taiwan ND HCV 683 HV2 515 RNA DM/IGT1 Univariate Yes OR = 3.51 [2.7, 4.56]; P < 0.001 Park et al [20 ] 2008 South Korea Prospective HCV1 62 HV2 172 RNA IR Univariate Yes 22.5% vs 5.2%; P < 0.001 Mohamed et al [22 ] 2009 Egypt Cross sectional HCV1 38 HV2 12 RNA IR Univariate Yes HOMA-IR = 3.98 (normal ALT) and 2.69 (a normal ALT) vs 1.92; P < 0.001 Duseja et al [23 ] 2009 India ND HCV1 85 HV2 25 RNA IR Univariate Yes 62% vs 16%; P = 0.0002 Lonardo et al [24 ] 2009 Italy ND HCV1 97 HV 182 RNA IR Univariate Yes P < 0.001Huang et al [25 ] 2009 Taiwan ND HCV1 93 HV 144 Ab IR Univariate Yes HOMA-IR 2.2 vs 1.6; P = 0.02 Mostafa et al [26 ] 2010 Egypt ND HCV 329 HV 173/795 RNA DM Univariate adjusted Yes OR = 1.35 [1.06, 1.73]; P = 0.02 Miyajima et al [27 ] 2013 Japan Cross sectional HCV 40 HV 1780/88 RNA IR Univariate Yes HOMA-IR 3.0 vs 1.3; P < 0.001 Younossi et al [28 ] 2013 United States Retrospective HCV 177 HV 19568 RNA DM and IR Multivariate Yes OR for DM 2.3 [1.18, 4.54] OR for IR 2.06 [1.19, 3.57] Pothineni et al [29 ] 2014 United States Retrospective HCV 1434 HV2 14799 RNA DM Univariate Yes 11.2% vs 5.1%; P < 0.01 Dai et al [30 ] 2013 Taiwan Retrospective HCV 160 HV2 480 RNA DM Multivariate Yes OR = 1.208 [1.009, 2.799]; P = 0.004 Mehta et al [10 ] 2003 United States Case-control HCV 12 HV2 1072 RNA DM Univariate No NS Stepanova et al [11 ] 2012 United States Nationwide survey HCV 791 HV 38715 RNA DM and IR Multivariate No NS Montenegro et al [9 ] 2013 Italy Prospective HCV 616 HV 1856 Ab DM Univariate adjusted No NS Ruhl et al [55 ] 2014 United States Cross sectional HCV 277 HV 14571 RNA DM Univariate adjusted No NS Vs hepatitis B virus infectionKnobler et al [17 ] 2000 Israel Case-control HCV 45 HBV 90 RNA DM Univariate Yes 33% vs 12%; P = 0.004 Ryu et al [31 ] 2001 South Korea Prospective HCV, F4 68 HBV 157 Ab DM Univariate Yes 24% vs 10.4%; P = 0.001 Wang et al [32 ] 2007 Taiwan Longitudinal HCV 926 HBV 544 Ab DM Multivariate Yes HR = 1.7 Huang et al [6 ] 2007 Taiwan Cross sectional HCV 478 HBV 1363 RNA DM Univariate Yes 18% vs 11.4%; P < 0.001 Moucari et al [33 ] 2008 France Retrospective HCV 500 HBV2 100 RNA HOMA-IR Univariate Yes 35% vs 5%; P < 0.001 White et al [12 ] 2008 United States Meta-analysis HCV 34 studies HBV/ HV - Ab/RNA DM Meta-analysis Yes Adjusted OR for HV 1.68 and for HBV 1.80 Rouabhia et al [34 ] 2010 Algeria Prospective cross sectional HCV1 290 HBV 126 RNA DM Multivariate Yes OR = 4.73 [1.7, 13.2]; P = 0.0029 Petta et al [56 ] 2011 Italy Retrospective HCV 170 HBV2 170 RNA HOMA-IR and DM Univariate Yes 42.2% vs 25.9%, P = 0.002 and 8.8% vs 3.6%, P = 0.04 Imazeki et al [57 ] 2008 Japan Retrospective HCV 544 HBV 286 RNA DM and IR Multivariate No NS Tanaka et al [58 ] 2008 Japan Case-control HCV1 30 HBV2 30 RNA IR Multivariate No NS Mavrogiannaki et al [59 ] 2008 Greece prospective case control HCV 108 HBV 81 RNA glucose intolerance Univariate adjusted No NS Persico et al [60 ] 2009 Italy Retrospective HCV 726 HBV 126 Ab DM Univariate adjusted No NS
Table 2 Glucose abnormalities and severe liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus-infected patients
Ref .Year Country Number of HCV patients Patient profile Glucose abnormality Statistical method Association with severe fibrosis1 Genotypes Statistics Konrad et al [42 ] 2000 Germany 10 Non DM FPG Multivariate Yes All P = 0.01Sud et al [61 ] 2004 Australia 170 - HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes All OR = 1.47 [1.14, 1.89]; P = 0.003 Muzzi et al [62 ] 2005 Switzerland 221 Non DM HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes All (except G3) OR = 1.57 [1.04, 2.39] D'souza et al [63 ] 2005 United Kingdom 59 - HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes All P = 0.001Taura et al [64 ] 2006 Japan 83 - HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes All OR = 7.32 [1.59, 33.73]; P = 0.01 Leandro et al [65 ] 2006 Italy 3068 - DM Multivariate Yes G1 OR = 4.52 [1.07, 19.1]; P = 0.011 Bugianesi et al [66 ] 2006 Italy 132 G3 with steatosis HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes G3 OR = 2.98 [1.13, 7.89]; P = 0.028 Kita et al [67 ] 2007 Japan 68 Post tranfusion hepatitis DM Multivariate Yes All OR = 8.4 [2.23, 31.54]; P = 0.002 Petta et al [68 ] 2008 Italy 201 G1 DM Multivariate Yes G1 OR = 2.69 [1.46, 4.95]; P < 0.001 Moucari et al [33 ] 2008 France 500 - HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes All OR = 1.8 [1.16, 2.81]; P = 0.009 Cua et al [69 ] 2008 Australia 346 G1, G3, untreated IR Multivariate Yes G3 OR = 3.15 [1.56, 6.35]; P = 0.001 Hsu et al [70 ] 2009 Taiwan 528 G1, G2 FPG Multivariate Yes G1 OR = 13.72 [2.15, 87.7]; P < 0.05 Moucari et al [71 ] 2009 France 226 G4 HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes G4 OR = 3.86 [1.859, 8.034]; P < 0.001 Persico et al [60 ] 2009 Italy 726 - DM Multivariate Yes All P < 0.05Hung et al [14 ] 2011 Taiwan 1470 - DM Univariate Yes All P < 0.001Patel et al [72 ] 2011 Asia 263 G2, G3 HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes G2 and G3 OR = 8.42 [2.1, 34.3]; P = 0.003 Mohamed et al [73 ] 2011 Egypt 50 G4 HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes G4 OR = 3.73; P = 0.001 Miyaaki et al [74 ] 2011 Japan 171 - DM Multivariate Yes All OR = 8.739 [2.85, 26.85]; P = 0.0002 Conjeevaram et al [75 ] 2011 United States 341 G1 HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes G1 OR = 1.28 [1.07, 1.51]; P = 0.005 Petta et al [56 ] 2011 Italy 170 G1 HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes G1 OR = 2.64 [1.11, 6.28]; P = 0.02 Khattab et al [76 ] 2012 Egypt 107 G4 HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes G4 OR = 1.87 [1.09, 8.29]; P = 0.04 Ziada et al [77 ] 2012 Egypt 140 Non DM HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes All OR = 1.92 [0.97, 3.4]; P = 0.049 Thompson et al [13 ] 2012 United States 1038 Non DM HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes All OR = 1.6 [1.1, 2.33]; P = 0.02 Alfaleh et al [78 ] 2013 Saudi Arabia 157 - DM Multivariate Yes All (except G4) OR = 0.37 [0.148, 0.927]; P = 0.034 Dokmeci et al [79 ] 2014 Turkey 104 - HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes All OR = 3.36 [1.32, 31.25]; P = 0.021 Huang et al [80 ] 2015 Taiwan 1077 - DM Multivariate Yes All OR = 1.81 [1.14, 2.65]; P = 0.002 Fartoux et al [81 ] 2005 France 141 Non DM HOMA-IR Univariate No No NS Elgouhari et al [82 ] 2008 United States 183 - DM Multivariate No No NS Petta et al [83 ] 2009 Italy 156 Non DM HOMA-IR Multivariate No No NS Rueger et al [84 ] 2014 Switzerland 1461 - DM Multivariate No No NS
Table 3 Impact of glucose abnormalities on virological response after interferon alpha based treatment
Ref .Year Country Patients number Patient profile Association Statistical method Impact on virological response Genotypes Statistics D'souza et al [63 ] 2005 United Kingdom 59 HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes All OR of SVR: 0.44 [0.22, 0.88]; P = 0.02 Tarantino et al [85 ] 2005 Italy 80 GMI Univariate Yes All 40% vs 7.5%; P = 0.0009 Romero-Gomez et al [86 ] 2005 Spain 159 HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes All OR of SVR 0.55 [0.33, 0.93]; P = 0.012 Jian Wu et al [87 ] 2006 China 98 HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes All OR of SVR: 0.17; P = 0.015 Backus et al [88 ] 2007 United States 5944 G1, G2, G3 DM Multivariates Yes All and G1 OR = 0.76 [0.64, 0.71]; P = 0.002 Conjeevaram et al [89 ] 2007 United States 401 G1 HOMA-IR Multivariates Yes G1 OR = 0.87 [0.77, 0.99]; P = 0.028 Elgouhari et al [82 ] 2008 United States 183 DM Multivariate Yes All OR of SVR 0.22 [0.07, 0.55]; P = 0.003 Poustchi et al [90 ] 2008 Australia 82 G2, G3 non DM HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes G2, G3 OR of SVR 0.16 [0.03, 0.77]; P = 0.02 Romero-Gomez et al [91 ] 2008 Spain 1059 FPG Multivariate Yes All OR of SVR 0.56 [0.34, 0.93]; P < 0.02 Moucari et al [71 ] 2009 France 226 G4 HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes - OR of SVR: 0.19 [0.07, 0.51]; P = 0.001 Dai et al [92 ] 2009 Taiwan 330 G1, G2 HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes G1, G2 OR of SVR 0.872 [0.79, 097]; P = 0.01 Hung et al [115 ] 2010 Taiwan 1470 DM Multivariate Yes All OR of SVR 0.69 [0.5, 0.96]; P = 0.029 Khattab et al [93 ] 2010 Egypt 131 Non DM, G4 HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes G4 OR of SVR 0.07 [0.01, 0.43]; P = 0.004 Deltenre et al [94 ] 2011 France 2732 G1-6 IR Meta-analysis Yes All - Eslam et al [95 ] 2011 2129 G1-6 IR Meta-analysis Yes All OR of SVR 0.35 [0.24, 0.51]; P = 0.0004 Del Campo et al [96 ] 2012 Spain 240 Non DM HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes G1, G4 OR of SVR 0.44 [0.17, 0.97]; P = 0.04 Ziada et al [77 ] 2012 Egypt 140 Non DM HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes All OR of SVR 0.41 [0.18, 0.9]; P = 0.003 Laurito et al [97 ] 2013 Brazil 2238 G1-6 IR Meta-analysis Yes All OR of SVR 0.41 [0.3, 0.56]; P = 0.022 Abd El-Wahab et al [98 ] 2014 Egypt 392 Non DM HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes All OR of virological response: 0.19 [0.1, 0.38]; P = 0.0001 Grasso et al [99 ] 2009 Italy 90 Non DM, G1 HOMA-IR Multivariate No G1 NS Fattovich et al [100 ] 2010 Italy 412 HOMA-IR Multivariate No No NS Khattab et al [76 ] 2012 Egypt 107 G4 HOMA-IR Multivariate No G4 NS Brandman et al [101 ] 2012 United States 23 Non DM IGT, FGP, SSGP Univariate No No NS Aghemo et al [102 ] 2012 Italy 339 HOMA-IR Univariate No No NS Fattovich et al [100 ] 2012 Italy 124 Non DM HOMA-IR Multivariate No No NS Serfaty et al [103 ] 2012 France 1611 G4 HOMA-IR Multivariate No G4 NS Alfaleh et al [78 ] 2013 Saudi Arabia 157 DM Multivariate No No NS Younossi et al [104 ] 2013 United States 5781 G1 HOMA-IR Univariate adjusted No G1 NS Jung et al [105 ] 2014 Soutk Korea 60 HOMA-IR Univariate No No NS
Table 4 Glucose abnormalities after interferon alpha based treatment
Ref .Year Country Number of HCV patients Patient profile Glucose metabolism parameter Statistical method Significant association or difference Genotypes Statistics Improvement of glucose abnormalities after HCV treatment Konrad et al [42 ] 2000 United States 13 FPG and FI Univariate Yes All P < 0.05 and P < 0.01Romero-Gomez et al [86 ] 2005 Spain 50 HOMA-IR Univariate Yes All In SVR; P < 0.05 Kawaguchi et al [106 ] 2007 Japan 89 HOMA-IR Univariate Yes All In SVR; P < 0.01 Chehadeh et al [107 ] 2009 Kuwait 181 G4 FPG Univariate Yes G4 In SVR; P < 0.001 Kim et al [108 ] 2009 Korea 28 G1, G2 HOMA-IR Multivariate Yes G1, G2 In SVR, OR of decreased IR 50 [3.74, 668.35]; P = 0.003 Conjeevaram et al [75 ] 2011 United States 341 G1 HOMA-IR Univariate Yes G1 In SVR; P < 0.001 Khattab et al [76 ] 2012 Egypt 107 G4, non cirrhotic HOMA-IR Univariate Yes G4 In SVR ; P = 0.001 Thompson et al [13 ] 2012 United States 1038 HOMA-IR Multivariate1 Yes All In G1 SVR; P = 0.007 Serfaty et al [103 ] 2012 France 161 G1, non cirrhotic HOMA-IR Univariate Yes G1 In SVR ; P < 0.05 Ziada et al [77 ] 2012 Egypt 140 Non DM, non cirrhotic HOMA-IR Univariate Yes All P = 0.009Chan et al [109 ] 2013 Australia 86 Non DM HOMA-IR Univariate Yes All In SVR; P = 0.04 Jung et al [105 ] 2014 South Korea 60 HOMA-IR Univariate Yes All In SVR; P = 0.036 Mello et al [110 ] 2006 Brazil 30 G1, G3 HOMA-IR Univariate No All NS Kawaguchi et al [111 ] 2009 Japan 72 Non DM, non cirrhotic HOMA-IR, SI and ISI Univariate1 No No HOMA-IR: NS In SVR, SI P = 0.002 and ISI P = 0.009 Brandman et al [101 ] 2012 United States 23 Non cirrhotic SSGP Univariate No No NS Occurrence of glucose abnormalities after HCV treatment Simó et al [112 ] 2006 Spain 234 Non DM DM or IGT Multivariate1 Yes All In SVR, OR = 0.48 [0.24, 0.48]; P = 0.04 Romero-Gomez et al [91 ] 2008 Spain 1059 DM or IGT Multivariate1 Yes All In SVR, OR = 0.44 [0.2, 0.97]; P = 0.04 Arase et al [113 ] 2009 Japan 2842 DM Multivariate1 Yes All In SVR, HR = 0.36 [0.24; 0.56] Aghemo et al [102 ] 2012 Italy 339 Non DM HOMA-IR Multivariate1 Yes All In SVR, OR = 0.36 [0.18, 0.72]; P = 0.004 Giordanino et al [114 ] 2008 Italy 202 Non DM DM or IGT Multivariate1 No No NS
Table 5 Glucose abnormalities and hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis C virus-infected patients
Ref .Year Country Patient number Patient profile Association Statistical method Association DM and HCC Statistics Diabetes mellitus/insulin resistance in HCV-related HCC K-Kutala et al [15 ] 2014 France 162 HCC, not treated for HCV DM and HCC Multivariate Yes3 HR = 3.13 [1.17, 8.38]; P = 0.0223 Hung et al [115 ] 2010 Taiwan 188 59 HCC; 129 non-HCC DM and HCC Multivariate Yes OR = 11.6 [2.500, 53.800]; P = 0.002 Hung et al [115 ] 2010 Taiwan 188 59 HCC; 129 non-HCC HOMA-IR and HCC Multivariate Yes OR = 2.0 [1.35, 3]; P = 0.001 Khattab et al [116 ] 2012 Egypt 294 147 HCC; 147 non-HCC HOMA-IR and HCC Multivariate Yes OR = 2.5 [1.7, 3.69]; P = 0.001 Mohamed et al [73 ] 2011 Egypt 100 50 HCC; 50 non-HCC; 20 non HCV HOMA-IR and HCC Univariate No NS Diabetes mellitus/insulin resistance and development of HCC in HCV-infected patients Chen et al [117 ] 2008 Taiwan 1095 - DM and HCC Multivariate Yes OR = 3.52 [1.29, 9.24] Veldt et al [16 ] 2008 Europe 541 DM and HCC Multivariate Yes3 OR = 3.28 [1.35, 7.97]; P = 0.0093 Konishi et al [118 ] 2009 Japan 197 Non DM, treated for HCV DM1 and HCC Multivariate Yes HR = 4.63 [1.677, 12.766]; P = 0.003 Hung et al [14 ] 2010 Taiwan 1470 Treated for HCV DM and HCC Multivariate Yes2 HR = 4.32 [1.23, 15.25]; P = 0.0232 Nkontchou et al [119 ] 2010 France 248 Cirrhotics HOMA-IR and HCC Multivariate Yes HR = 1.10 [1.01, 1.21]; P = 0.026 Takahashi et al [120 ] 2011 Japan 203 Non DM, treated for HCV DM1 and HCC Multivariate Yes HR = 6.9 [1.7, 28.4]; P < 0.05 Arase et al [121 ] 2013 Japan 4302 Non treated for HCV DM and HCC Multivariate Yes HR = 1.73 [1.3, 2.3]; P < 0.001 Elkrief et al [45 ] 2014 France 348 Cirrhotics DM Multivariate Yes HR = 1.938 [1.129 , 3.328]; P = 0.016 Toyoda et al [122 ] 2015 Japan 522 Patients with SVR DM and HCC Multivariate Yes HR = 2.08 [1.0170, 4.0133]; P = 0.045 Lai et al [123 ] 2006 Taiwan 2141 - DM and HCC Multivariate No NS Chen et al [124 ] 2013 Taiwan 5186 - DM and HCC Multivariate No NS