Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2017; 23(8): 1338-1344
Published online Feb 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i8.1338
Table 1 Clinical features of the study group
Number34
Age (yr)
Range48-91
Median65.5
Sex, n (%)
Male28 (82.4)
Female6 (17.6)
Table 2 TGR5 expression in squamous mucosa, Barrett’s esophagus, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma n (%)
NegativeWeakModerateStrong
Squamous mucosa, n = 1813 (72)5 (28)00
Barrett’s esophagus, n = 151 (6.7)12 (80)2 (13.3)0P < 0.001, compared with squamous mucosa
Low grade dysplasia, n = 805 (62.5)2 (25)1 (12.5)P > 0.05, compared with BE
High grade dysplasia, n = 91 (11.1)02 (22.2)6 (66.7)P < 0.001, compared with BE
P < 0.05, compared with low grade dysplasia
EA, n = 16007 (43.7)9 (56.3)P < 0.001, compared with BE
P < 0.01, compared with low grade dysplasia
Table 3 TGR5 expression in different clinical stages of esophageal adenocarcinoma n (%)
Clinical stageNegativeWeakModerateStrong
I and II, n = 9004 (44.4)5 (55.6)
III and IV, n = 7003 (42.9)4 (57.1)P > 0.05
Table 4 TGR5 expression in different pathological stages of esophageal adenocarcinoma n (%)
Pathological stageNegativeWeakModerateStrong
T1 and T2002 (40)3 (60)
T3 and T4004 (36.4)7 (63.6)P > 0.05
Table 5 TGR5 expression in patients with or without lymph node metastasis of esophageal adenocarcinoma n (%)
Lymph node metastasisNegativeWeakModerateStrong
Positive002 (33.3)4 (66.7)P > 0.05
Negative005 (50)5 (50)