Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2017; 23(7): 1139-1146
Published online Feb 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i7.1139
Published online Feb 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i7.1139
Ref. | Study period | Patient number total(AR:NAR) | Inclusion criteria | Method ofAR | Cirrhosis(yes/no) | Bleeding amount (mL, AR:NAR) | Survival benefit of AR for OS and RFS | Recurrence pattern (local or multicentric) | Others |
D:Dye injection | ICG R15 | ||||||||
G:Glissonian | Difference | ||||||||
B/W AR and NAR | |||||||||
Benefit | |||||||||
Yamamoto et al[18] | 1990-1994 | n = 204 (90:114) | Solitary ≤ 5 cm | Glissonian | P = 0.02 | Not shown | Yes | NA | |
NA | OS (P = 0.0002) | ||||||||
Regimbeau et al[7] | 1990-1996 | n = 64 (30:34) | Solitary < 4 cm | Glissonean + US | NA | Not shown | Yes | NA | |
NA | OS and RFS (P < 0.05) | ||||||||
Hasegawa et al[12] | 1994-2001 | n = 210 (156:54) | Solitary | Dye injection | 0.002 | P = 0.8 (574: 560) | Yes | NA | |
P < 0.0001 | OS (P = 0.01) | ||||||||
RFS (P = 0.006) | |||||||||
Cho et al[38] | 1998-2001 | n = 168 (99:69) | Solitary ≤ 5 cm | Not described | P = 0.026 | Not shown | Yes | NA | |
NA | OS (P = 0.032) | ||||||||
RFS (P = 0.003) | |||||||||
Wakai et al[15] | 1990-2004 | n = 158 (95:63) | Solitary pT1-T2 | Glissonean | P = 0.015 AR < NAR | P = 0.017 (813:590) | Yes | NA | |
P = 0.001 | OS (P = 0.03) RFS (P = 0.008), for pT2 OS (P = 0.001) and RFS (P = 0.0004) | ||||||||
Yamashita et al[25] | 1985-2004 | n = 321 (201:120) | Solitary | Glissonean | P < 0.01 | P < 0.01 (1353:993) | Yes | NA | |
P < 0.01 | OS and RFS (P = 0.01) for liver damaged, No for less damaged | ||||||||
Ueno et al[37] | 1990-2004 | n = 116 (52:64) | ≤ 3 nodules, ≤ 3 cm | Dye injection | NA | P = 0.46 (1609:1224) | No for OS (P = 0.19) | NA | |
P = 0.006 | Yes for RFS (P < 0.03) | ||||||||
Kobayashi et al[33] | 1990-2004 | n = 233 (106:127) | Solitary | Dye injection | P < 0.0001 | NA | Yes | Different | |
P < 0.0001 | RFS (P = 0.0002) | local recu: AR < NAR (P < 0.002) | |||||||
Eguchi et al[31] | 1994-2001 | n = 5781 (2267:3514) | Mixed | D&G mixed | NA | Not shown | Yes | NA | Japanese nationwide survey |
OS (P = 0.0529) | |||||||||
RFS (P = 0.0089) | |||||||||
Yamazaki et al[26] | 1994-2007 | n = 209 (111:98) | Solitary ≤ 5 cm | Glissonean | P = 0.003 | P < 0.0001 (1266:842) | Yes | NA | |
NA | OS (P = 0.004), | ||||||||
RFS (P = 0.023) | |||||||||
No benefit | |||||||||
Capussotti et al[30] | 1985-2001 | n = 216 (156:60) | No limitation | Not clear | NA | Not shown | No OS (P = 0.9) | NA | |
Portolani et al[36] | 1986-2003 | n = 213 (131:82) | NA | Not described | NA | Not shown | No | NA | |
NA | |||||||||
Tanaka et al[14] | 1992-2005 | n = 125 (83:42) | Solitary | Not clear | P = 0.035 | P = 0.23 (1000:1200) | No | No diff (P = 0.39) | |
NA | OS (P = 0.34) | ||||||||
Kaibori et al[13] | 1992-2003 | n = 237 (34:217) | HepC(+) | Dye injection | P = 0.006 | 0.27 (1779:1414) | No | No diff (P = 0.12) | |
(OS = 0.7 and DFS 0.76) | |||||||||
Tomimaru et al[27] | 1990-2008 | n = 92 (30:62) | Solitary ≤ 3 cm | Not clear | P = 0.4 | P = 0.03 (1112:756) | No | No diff (P = 0.29) | |
P = 0.7 | OS (P = 0.67) | ||||||||
RFS (P = 0.77) | |||||||||
Ahn et al[22] | 2001-2011 | n = 140 (65:75) | Solitary | Dye injection | P = 0.008 | P = 0.05 (410:559) | No | NA | Segmentectomy vs NAR |
P < 0.001 | OS (P = 0.08) | ||||||||
Marubashi et al[34] | 2001-2012 | n = 424 (243:181) | No limitation | Dye injection | NA | P < 0.001 (1237:640) | No | No diff (P = 0.23) | No difference in recurrence pattern |
P < 0.001 | RFS P = 0.3 | ||||||||
Yamamoto et al[29] | 2003-2013 | n = 44 (16:28) | Solitary | Dye injection | 0.005 | P = 0.002 | No | NA | |
P = 0.029 | (711:222) | OS (P = 0.6), DFS (0.58) | |||||||
Yes for HBsAg(+) (P = 0.008) |
Ref. | Study period | Patient total number and after propensity score matched (AR:NAR) | Inclusion criteria | Method of AR | ICG R15 | Bleeding amount | Survival benefit of AR |
D:Dye injection | Difference | (mL, AR:NAR) | |||||
G:Glissonian | B/W AR and NAR | ||||||
Okamura et al[35], 2014 | 2002-2013 | n = 236 (139:97 and 64:64) | Solitary | Dye injection | P = 0.07 | P = 0.008 (551:465) | No |
RFS (P = 0.52) | |||||||
Ishii et al[32], 2014 | 2002-2010 | n = 268 (110:158 and 44:44) | Solitary ≤ 5 cm | Not Clear | P = 0.053 | 0.9 (400:355) | No |
OS (P = 0.29) RFS (P = 0.28) | |||||||
Marubashi et al[28], 2015 | 1981-2012 | n = 1102 (577:525 and 329:329) | No limitation | Not clear | NA | Not shown | No |
OS (P = 0.7) and RFS (P = 0.4) |
- Citation: Kang KJ, Ahn KS. Anatomical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: A critical review of the procedure and its benefits on survival. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(7): 1139-1146
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i7/1139.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i7.1139