Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2017; 23(6): 931-934
Published online Feb 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i6.931
Published online Feb 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i6.931
Ref. | Type of study | Population | Type of stent | Time of removal | Stricture rate | Stent migration rate |
Ye et al[6], 2016 | Cohort | circumferential | Fully-covered self-expandable metallic stents (CZES stent; Sigma, China) | 12 wk | 17.4% | 17.4% |
Wen et al[7], 2014 | RCT | mucosal defect > 3/4 | Fully-covered self-expandable metallic stents (CZES stent; Sigma, China) | 8 wk | 18.2% | 18.2% |
Saito et al[11], 2008 | Case report | mucosal defect > 3/4 | PLLA esophageal stent (Tanaka-Marui stent; Marui Textile Machinery Co., Japan) | Self-degradable | 0 | 0 |
Saito et al[10], 2007 | Case report | mucosal defect > 3/4 | PLLA esophageal stent (Tanaka-Marui stent; Marui Textile Machinery Co., Japan) | Self-degradable | 0 | 77.0% |
- Citation: Shi KD, Ji F. Prophylactic stenting for esophageal stricture prevention after endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(6): 931-934
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i6/931.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i6.931