Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2017; 23(44): 7818-7829
Published online Nov 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i44.7818
Table 1 Summary of chromosome imbalances in 120 hepatocellular carcinoma specimens and normal paired tissues
Chromosome regionCopy numberCytobandGrade I/II HCCGrade III/IV HCCP value
1qGain1q21.1-4457.86%60.63%NS
4qLoss4q13.1- 35.239.56%47.51%NS
8pLoss8p 23.2-21.148.56%56.28%NS
8qGain8q12.3-24.339.99%62.01%0.006a
16qLoss16q23.3-24.338.96%47.32%NS
17pLoss17p13.3-1252.22%53.73%NS
17qGain17q22-25.337.76%36.37%NS
Table 2 Disease-free survival analysis of clinicopathological data and percentage genome change of 120 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Clinicopathological factorLog-rank test, P valueCox regression analysis, P valueHR (95%CI)
Age (yr), ≤ 49 (22.5%) vs > 49 (77.5%)0.004a0.1690.674 (0.384-1.183)
Sex (M/F), M (81.7%) vs F (19.3%)0.146
Tumor size (cm), ≤ 4.5 (69.2%) vs > 4.5 (30.8%)0.001a0.012a1.959 (1.160-3.309)
Satellite lesions (%), Yes (7.5%) vs No (92.5%)0.0880.013a2.900 (1255-6.702)
Vascular invasion (%), Yes (28.3%) vs No (71.7%)0.240
Grading I, II, III, IV (%), III & IV (43.3%) vs I & II (56.7%)0.004a0.0631.626 (0.974-2.717)
Margin < 0.5 cm (%), ≤ 0.5 cm (47.5%) vs > 0.5 cm (52.5%)0.210
Cirrhosis (%), Yes (54.2%) vs No (45.8%)0.258
AFP (100 ng/mL), £100 (77.5%) vs > 100 (22.5%)0.006a0.4621.244 (0.695-2.227)
Alkaline phosphatase (120 U/L), ≤ 120 (88.3%) vs > 120 (11.7%)0.016a0.042a1.976 (1.025-3.808)
Staging I/II, II (40.0%) vs I (60.0%)0.104
Percentage genome changed (60%), ≥ 60% (7.5%) vs < 60% (92.5%)0.004a0.031a2.346 (1.080-5.097)
Table 3 Cox regression analysis for disease-free survival in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma
GeneCytobandCNAHR95%CIP value
ELAC217p12Amplification2.7841.153-6.7240.023a
MYC8q24.21Amplification1.7721.074-2.9240.025a
SYK9q22.2Amplification4.2041.813-9.7480.001a
GAK4p16.3Deletion2.9161.635-5.199< 0.001a
MECOM3q26.2Deletion5.9322.012-17.4890.001a
WRN8p12Deletion1.91.172-3.0800.009a