Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2017; 23(28): 5229-5236
Published online Jul 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5229
Table 1 Comparison of the indices of gastric function measured using the modified and traditional B-ultrasound methods
IndexModified method (n = 32)Traditional method (n = 32)t-valueP value
ACF2.39 ± 0.243.22 ± 0.32-10.5800.000
ACA0.36 ± 0.040.69 ± 0.11-14.3760.000
MI3.34 ± 0.254.37 ± 0.34-12.4450.000
GET32.65 ± 4.4660.44 ± 4.98-21.1960.000
Table 2 Correlation analysis of indices measured using the modified and traditional methods
IndexCorrelation coefficientP value95%CI
ACF0.6130.0030.21-0.74
ACA0.3240.080-0.06-0.63
MI0.5360.0050.19-0.76
GET0.5720.0040.21-0.77
Table 3 Comparison of the implementation of enteral nutrition in the two groups of patients
ICU time (d)Hospitalization time (d)Enteral nutrition time (h)Average daily calorie value (kcal/kg)
Modified B-ultrasound method (n = 26)4.42 ± 1.9213.35 ± 2.9230.38 ± 9.4228.73 ± 4.35
Gastric juice withdrawal method (n = 26)5.31 ± 2.1116.58 ± 5.9536.63 ± 10.2625.69 ± 3.74
t-value-1.620-2.482-2.1232.702
P value0.1110.0160.0390.009