Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2017; 23(27): 4958-4967
Published online Jul 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i27.4958
Table 1 Hardy weinberg equilibrium n (%)
Genotype distribution
Hardy Weinberg equilibrium
SNPGenotypeFrequencyExpected frequency (n)P value1
ATG16L1 rs10210302CC25 (21.0)24NS
TC57 (47.9)59
TT37 (31.1)36
ATG16L1 rs2241880AA27 (22.5)26NS
GA57 (47.5)60
GG36 (30.0)35
Fas Ligand rs763110CC42 (36.5)41NS
TC54 (47.0)55
TT19 (16.5)18
IBD5 rs2522057CC35 (29.2)290.045
GC49 (40.8)60
GG36 (30.0)31
FCGR 3A rs396991AA70 (58.3)620.0005
AC33 (27.5)48
CC17 (14.2)9
TNF gene (-308) rs1800629AA4 (3.4)3NS
GA31 (26.1)33
GG84 (70.6)83
TNF gene (-238) rs361525AA2 (1.7)1NS
GA15 (12.5)17
GG103 (85.8)102
Table 2 Clinical and demographic patient characteristics n (%)
VariablesTotalAnti-TNF treatment
P value
Non-respondersEver responders
Total121 (100)21 (17)100 (83)NA
Patient demographics
Gender
Female71 (59)15 (71)56 (56)NS
Male50 (41)6 (29)44 (44)
Race
Caucasian112 (93)21 (100)91 (91)NS
African American9 (7)0 (0.0)9 (9)
Socioeconomic status1
1st Quartile24 (20)4 (19)20 (20)NS
2nd Quartile40 (33)6 (29)34 (34)
3rd Quartile29 (24)3 (14)26 (26)
4th Quartile28 (23)8 (38)20 (20)
Montreal classification
Age of onset (A)
A1 - below 16 years old14 (12)1 (5)13 (13)NS
A2 - between 17 and 40 years old90 (74)17 (81)73 (73)
A3 - above 40 years old17 (14)3 (14)14 (14)
Location (L)
L1 - ileal15 (12)1 (5)14 (14)NS
L2 - colonic32 (26)5 (24)27 (27)
L3 - ileocolonic74 (61)15 (71)59 (59)
Location (L4) upper
No upper GI disease118 (98)21 (100)97 (97)NS
L4 - upper GI disease3 (2)0 (0)3 (3)
Behavior (B)
B1 - non-stricturing, non-penetrating36 (30)4 (19)32 (32)0.1
B2 - stricturing45 (37)12 (57)33 (33)
B3 - penetrating40 (33)5 (24)35 (35)
Behavior (p) perianal disease
No perianal disease84 (69)18 (86)66 (66)0.08
p - perianal disease present37 (31)3 (14)34 (34)
Anti-TNF treatment type
Drugs received
Infliximab46 (38)10 (48)36 (36)NS
Adalimumab45 (38)5 (24)40 (40)
Infliximab and Adalimumab229 (24)6 (29)23 (23)
Certolizumab pegol505
Table 3 Single nucleotide polymorphisms tested with genotype and allele distribution for entire patients group n (%)
Genotype distribution
Allele distribution
SNPLocation relative to gene (Chromosome number)Nucleotide changeAssay successfulGenotypeFrequencyAlleleFrequency
ATG16L1 rs102103022 kb upstream (2)C/T119 (98)CC25 (21.0)Total238
TC57 (47.9)C107 (45.0)
TT37 (31.1)T131 (55.0)
ATG16L1 rs2241880Thr300Ala (2)A/G120 (99)AA27 (22.5)Total240
GA57 (47.5)A111 (46.3)
GG36 (30.0)G129 (53.7)
FAS ligand rs763110-843 (1)C/T115 (95)CC42 (36.5)Total230
TC54 (47.0)C138 (60.0)
TT19 (16.5)T92 (40.0)
IBD5 rs2522057Intergenic region (5)C/G120 (99)CC35 (29.2)Total240
GC49 (40.8)C119 (49.6)
GG36 (30.0)G121 (50.4)
FCGR 3A rs396991Phe175Val (1)C/G120 (99)AA70 (58.3)Total240
AC33 (27.5)A173 (72.1)
CC17 (14.2)C67 (27.9)
TNF gene (-308) rs1800629promotor region (6)A/G119 (98)AA4 (3.4)Total238
GA31 (26.1)A39 (19.6)
GG84 (70.6)G199 (80.4)
TNF gene (-238) rs361525promotor region (6)A/G120 (99)AA2 (1.7)Total240
GA15 (12.5)A19 (7.9)
GG103 (85.8)G221 (92.1)
Table 4 Single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes according to anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment response
SNPGenotypeAnti-TNF treatment response
P value1
Non-respondersResponders
ATG16L1 rs10210302CC5 (25.0)20 (20.2)NS
TC9 (45.0)48 (48.5)
TT6 (30.0)31 (31.3)
ATG16L1 rs2241880AA5 (23.8)22 (22.2)NS
GA10 (47.6)47 (47.5)
GG6 (28.6)30 (30.3)
FAS Ligand rs763110CC12 (60.0)30 (31.6)0.042
TC5 (25.0)49 (51.6)
TT3 (15.0)16 (16.8)
FAS Ligand rs763110 (grouped)CC12 (60.0)30 (31.6)0.016 OR = 3.23, 95%CI: 1.20-8.78
TC + TT8 (40.0)65 (68.4)
IBD5 rs2522057CC6 (28.6)29 (29.3)NS
GC9 (42.9)40 (40.4)
GG6 (28.6)30 (30.3)
FCGR 3A rs396991AA11 (52.4)59 (59.6)NS
AC6 (28.6)27 (27.3)
CC4 (19.0)13 (13.1)
TNF gene (-308) rs1800629AA2 (10.0)2 (2.0)0.088
GA7 (35.0)24 (24.2)
GG11 (55.0)73 (73.7)
TNF gene (-308) rs1800629 (grouped)AA + GA9 (45.0)26 (26.3)0.093 OR = 2.29, 95%CI: 0.85-6.17
GG11 (55.0)73 (73.7)
TNF gene (-238) rs361525AA0 (0.0)2 (2.0)NS
GA2 (10.0)13 (13.0)
GG18 (90.0)85 (85.0)
Table 5 Univariable logistic regression data regarding factors associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment failure
CovariateP value
Demographic variables
GenderNS
RaceNS
Montreal Classification
Age of onset (A) MontrealNS
Location (L) MontrealNS
Location (L4) upper GI MontrealNS
Behavior (B) Montreal0.131
Behavior (p) perianal Montreal0.091
SNP variables
ATG16L1 rs10210302NS
ATG16L1 rs2241880NS
FAS Ligand rs7631100.0571
FAS Ligand rs763110 (TC + TT grouped)0.021
IBD5 rs2522057NS
FCGR 3A rs396991NS
TNF gene (-308) rs18006290.131
TNF gene (-308) rs1800629 (AA + GA grouped)0.0991
TNF gene(-238) rs361525NS
Table 6 Multivariable logistic regression models predicting anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment failure
ModelVariableClassEstimateGlobal P valueOR (95%CI)
aFAS ligand rs763110 (TC + TT grouped)CC1.4600.0094.30 (1.45-12.80)
TC+TT0
Montreal behavior (B)B1-0.083NS0.92 (0.21-3.96)
B21.1583.18 (0.89-11.34)
B30
Montreal behavior (p) perianalNo0.964NS2.62 (0.68-10.09)
Yes0
bTNF gene (-308) rs1800629 (AA+GA grouped)AA+GA1.0560.0492.88 (1.01-8.22)
GG0
Montreal Behavior (B)B1-0.153NS0.86 (0.20-3.59)
B20.8262.28 (0.68-7.61)
B30
Montreal Behavior (p) perianalNo1.213NS3.36 (0.87-12.93)
Yes0
cFAS ligand (CC genotype) and TNF gene -308 (AA or GA genotype) combinedCC and AA or GA1.5600.0154.76 (1.35-16.77)
Other0
Montreal behavior (B)B1-0.022NS0.98 (0.23-4.22)
B20.9502.59 (0.73-9.17)
B30
Montreal behavior (p) perianalNo0.970NS2.64 (0.69-10.10)
Yes0