Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2017; 23(15): 2723-2730
Published online Apr 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2723
Published online Apr 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2723
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients and therapeutic approaches (n = 83) n (%)
Type II (n = 62) | Type III (n = 21) | P value | |
Age (yr) | 0.72 | ||
Median (range) | 68.5 (33-87) | 69 (54-80) | |
Sex | 0.78 | ||
Male | 49 (79) | 16 (76) | |
Female | 13 (21) | 5 (24) | |
Tumor size (mm) | 50 (10-168) | 70 (12-120) | 0.016 |
Esophageal invasion (mm) | 9 (0-85) | 5 (0-15) | 0.024 |
Total number of examined lymph nodes | 36.5 (5-96) | 51 (22-80) | 0.016 |
Approach | |||
Right thoracic | 8 (13) | 0 (0) | |
Left thoracic | 8 (13) | 1 (5) | |
Transhiatal | 46 (74) | 20 (95) | |
Resection method | |||
Subtotal esophagectomy | 8 (13) | 0 (0) | |
Total gastrectomy with distal esophagectomy | 37 (60) | 21 (100) | |
Proximal gastrectomy with distal esophagectomy | 17 (27) | 0 (0) | |
Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.24 | ||
Yes | 19 (31) | 9 (43) | |
No | 43 (69) | 12 (57) |
Table 2 Pathological characteristics of patients (n = 83) n (%)
Type II(n = 62) | Type III(n = 21) | P value | |
T category | 0.06 | ||
T1b | 11 (18) | 0 (0) | |
T2 | 11 (18) | 2 (10) | |
T3 | 40 (64) | 19 (90) | |
N category | 0.41 | ||
N0 | 21 (34) | 4 (19) | |
N1 | 12 (19) | 6 (29) | |
N2 | 13 (21) | 3 (14) | |
N3 | 14 (23) | 6 (29) | |
LNR | 0.063 (0-1) | 0.047 (0-0.41) | 0.74 |
M category | 0.64 | ||
M0 | 58 (94) | 19 (90) | |
M1 | 4 (6) | 2 (10) | |
TNM stage | 0.30 | ||
IA | 10 (16) | 0 (0) | |
IB | 5 (8) | 0 (0) | |
IIA | 6 (10) | 4 (19) | |
IIB | 5 (8) | 1 (5) | |
IIIA | 8 (13) | 5 (24) | |
IIIB | 11 (18) | 3 (14) | |
IIIC | 12 (19) | 6 (29) | |
IV | 5 (8) | 2 (10) | |
ly category | 0.35 | ||
ly0 | 8 (13) | 0 (0) | |
ly1 | 16 (26) | 5 (24) | |
ly2 | 22 (35) | 9 (43) | |
ly3 | 16 (26) | 7 (33) | |
v category | 0.55 | ||
v0 | 7 (11) | 3 (14) | |
v1 | 13 (21) | 4 (19) | |
v2 | 24 (39) | 5 (24) | |
v3 | 18 (29) | 9 (43) | |
Histopathological grade | 0.56 | ||
G1 + G2 | 37 (60) | 11 (52) | |
G3 + G4 | 25 (40) | 10 (48) |
Table 3 Incidence, 5-year survival rate, and index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection
Lymph node | Type II | Type III | Total | |||||
station | Number of patients with dissection | Number of patients with metastasis | Number of patients with dissection | Number of patients with metastasis | Number of patients with dissection | Number of patients with metastasis | 5-yr survival rate | IEBLD |
1 | 62 | 27 | 21 | 11 | 83 | 38 | 49.70% | 22.8 |
2 | 62 | 14 | 21 | 5 | 83 | 19 | 50.70% | 11.6 |
3 | 62 | 27 | 21 | 14 | 83 | 41 | 53.70% | 26.5 |
4sa | 42 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 60 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
4sb | 43 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 62 | 2 | 100% | 3.2 |
4d | 39 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 59 | 0 | NA | 0.0 |
5 | 25 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 39 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
6 | 31 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 52 | 0 | NA | 0.0 |
7 | 58 | 17 | 21 | 6 | 79 | 23 | 36.30% | 10.6 |
8 | 42 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 63 | 6 | 20.80% | 2.0 |
9 | 32 | 5 | 14 | 2 | 46 | 7 | 42.90% | 6.5 |
10 | 28 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 40 | 3 | 66.70% | 5.0 |
11p | 33 | 4 | 19 | 0 | 52 | 4 | 33.30% | 2.6 |
11d | 24 | 4 | 11 | 1 | 35 | 5 | 60% | 8.6 |
12 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | NA | 0.0 |
16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | NA | 0.0 |
LMLN | 13 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 20% | 6.3 |
MMLN | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
UMLN | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
Table 4 Prognostic analysis in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction
Category | Classification | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
n | Proportion | 5 yr-OS | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | ||
Age (yr) | < 65 | 29 | 35% | 67% | 0.084 | 0.47 | ||
≥ 65 | 54 | 65% | 52% | |||||
Sex | Male | 65 | 78% | 56% | 0.57 | |||
Female | 18 | 22% | 67% | |||||
Siewert type | II | 62 | 75% | 58% | 0.88 | |||
III | 21 | 25% | 57% | |||||
Esophageal invasion | ≤ 3 cm | 73 | 88% | 60% | 0.21 | |||
> 3 cm | 10 | 12% | 40% | |||||
Tumor size | < 6 cm | 45 | 54% | 58% | 0.86 | |||
≥ 6 cm | 38 | 46% | 58% | |||||
pT | pT1-2 | 24 | 29% | 77% | 0.01a | 0.88 | ||
pT3 | 59 | 71% | 50% | |||||
pN | pN0 | 25 | 30% | 78% | 0.028a | 0.30 | ||
pN1-3 | 58 | 70% | 49% | |||||
Mediastinal LN meta | No | 78 | 94% | 60% | 0.007a | 0.17 | ||
Yes | 5 | 6% | 20% | |||||
LNR | < 0.16 | 59 | 71% | 71% | < 0.001a | 0.001a | ||
> 0.16 | 24 | 29% | 23% | 4.29 | 1.79-10.89 | |||
ly | ly0, 1 | 29 | 35% | 69% | 0.059 | 0.13 | ||
ly2, 3 | 54 | 65% | 52% | |||||
v | v0, 1 | 27 | 33% | 83% | < 0.001a | 0.004a | ||
v2, 3 | 56 | 67% | 46% | 5.99 | 1.71-24.90 | |||
Histopathological Grade | G1 + G2 | 48 | 58% | 60% | 0.28 | |||
G3 + G4 | 35 | 42% | 55% | |||||
Adjuvant chemotherapy | No | 54 | 65% | 56% | 0.52 | |||
Yes | 29 | 35% | 61% | |||||
Residual tumor | R0 | 74 | 89% | 62% | < 0.001a | 0.056 | ||
R1 | 9 | 11% | 22% | 2.61 | 0.97-6.59 |
- Citation: Hosoda K, Yamashita K, Moriya H, Mieno H, Watanabe M. Optimal treatment for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(15): 2723-2730
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i15/2723.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2723