Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2017; 23(15): 2660-2672
Published online Apr 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2660
Published online Apr 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2660
Table 1 Studies revealing outcomes of pancreatic fluid collections with newly designed metal stents
Study | n | Stent used | Size (cm) | Technical success, % | Clinical success, % | Necrosectomy, % |
Walter et al[49], 2015 | 61 | AXIOS | 9.0 | 98.0 | PC-93 | 43.0 |
PC-15 | WON-81 | |||||
WON-46 | ||||||
Shah et al[48], 2015 | 33 | AXIOS | 9 ± 3.3 | 91.0 | 93.0 | 33.0 |
Chandran et al[46], 2015 | 47 | NAGI | 10.0 | 98.0 | 19.2 | |
PC-38 | 76.6 | |||||
WON-9 | ||||||
Siddiqui et al[34], 2016 | 82 | AXIOS | 11.8 | 97.5 | PC-100 | All WON |
PC-12 | WON-88 | |||||
WON-68 | ||||||
Sharaiha et al[54], 2016 | 124 | AXIOS | 9.5 | 100.0 | 86.3 | 62.9 |
All WON | ||||||
Rinninella et al[45], 2015 | 93 | Hot AXIOS | 10.0 | 98.9 | PC-100 | 59.6 |
PC-18 | WON-90.4 | |||||
WON-52 | ||||||
Lakhtakia et al[65], 2016 | WON-205 | NAGI | 10.8 | 99.0 | 96.5 | 9.2 |
Vazquez-Sequeiros et al[50], 2016 | 211 | FCMS-139 | 9.3 | 97.0 | 94.0 | 17.0 |
PC-112 | AXIOS-72 | |||||
WON-99 |
Table 2 Selected studies comparing the outcomes between plastic and metal stents
Study | PFC type | n | Success | AE | Conclusion |
Lee et al[55] 2014 | WON-14 | PS-25 | 90.9% | 8% | Efficacy equal |
PC-36 | FCMS-25 | 87% | 0 | Re-intervention: FCMS = PS | |
AE: FCMS = PS | |||||
Mukai et al[53] 2015 | WON | PS-27 | 92.6% | 18.5% | Efficacy and AE: BFMS = PS |
BFMS-43 | 97.7% | 7% | Re-intervention: BFMS < PS | ||
AE: BFMS = PS | |||||
Sharaiha et al[54] 2015 | PC | PS-118 | 89% | 31% | Efficacy: FCMS > PS |
FCMS-112 | 98% | 16% | AE: FCMS < PS | ||
Siddiqui et al[52] 2016 | WON | PS-106 | 81% | 7.5% | Efficacy: FCMS, LAMS > PS |
FCMS-121 | 95% | 1.6% | Re-intervention: LAM < FCMS < PS | ||
LAMS-86 | 90% | 9.3% | AE: LAMS = PS > FCMS | ||
Bapaye et al[76] 2016 | WON | PS-61 | 73.7% | 36.1% | Efficacy: BFMS > PS |
BFMS-72 | 94% | 5.6% | Re-intervention: BFMS < PS | ||
AE: BFMS < PS |
Table 3 Adverse events in selected studies evaluating endoscopic ultrasonography drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with metal stents
Study | n | Perforation, % | Bleeding, % | Migration, % | Infection, % | Overall complications, % |
Walter et al[49], 2014 | 61 | 1.6 | 6.5 | 4.9 | 6.5 | 9.0 |
Chandran et al[46], 2015 | 54 | - | 5.5 | 20.4 | 4.0, 7.4 | Early-7.4 |
Late-11.1 | ||||||
Bapaye et al[43], 2015 | 19 | - | 5.3 | 5.3 | - | 10.5 |
Rinninella et al[45], 2015 | 93 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 5.4 |
Vazquez-Sequeiros et al[50], 2016 | 211 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 11.0 | 21.0 |
Siddiqui et al[34], 2016 | 82 | 1.2 | 7.3 | - | 6.1 | 9.8 |
Sharaiha et al[33], 2016 | 124 | - | Early-1.6 | Early-2.4 | Early-3.2 | Early-11.3 |
Late-0 | Late-3.2 | Late-2.4 | Late-7.2 | |||
Lakhtakia et al[65], 2016 | 205 | 1.0 | 2.9 | 2.4 | - | 3.9 |
- Citation: Nabi Z, Basha J, Reddy DN. Endoscopic management of pancreatic fluid collections-revisited. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(15): 2660-2672
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i15/2660.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2660