Lee JW, Lee MS, Chung IK, Son MW, Cho YS, Lee SM. Clinical implication of FDG uptake of bone marrow on PET/CT in gastric cancer patients with surgical resection. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(13): 2385-2395 [PMID: 28428718 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i13.2385]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Sang Mi Lee, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, 23-20 Byeongmyeong-dong, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan, Chuncheongnam-do 330-721, South Korea. gareen@naver.com
Research Domain of This Article
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 5 Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival and overall survival in model with all 309 patients and 156 patients with positive F-18 fluorodexoyglucose uptake
Variables
Model with all patients
Model with patients with positive FDG uptake
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
RFS
Age
0.461
1.38 (0.58-3.28)
0.228
1.69 (0.72-3.96)
Location
Body
1.00
1.00
Fundus
0.543
0.50 (0.05-4.78)
0.634
0.58 (0.06-5.32)
Antrum
0.276
0.64 (0.29-1.42)
0.695
0.86 (0.41-1.82)
Multiple
0.037
6.06 (1.36-26.92)
0.034
5.19 (1.13-23.76)
T stage
T1
1.00
1.00
T2
0.342
1.81 (0.53-6.19)
0.250
2.05 (0.60-6.99)
T3
0.200
2.31 (0.64-8.29)
0.096
3.01 (0.82-10.97)
T4
0.020
4.99 (1.29-19.38)
0.014
5.50 (1.42-21.31)
Lymph node metastasis
0.037
2.96 (1.07-8.21)
0.004
4.50 (1.61-12.54)
Tumor size
0.661
1.27 (0.43-3.75)
0.594
1.34 (0.46-3.95)
Tumor involvement of resection margin
0.035
4.32 (1.11-16.81)
0.023
4.94 (1.24-19.62)
White blood cell
0.150
1.96 (0.78-4.92)
0.053
2.37 (0.99-5.67)
Hemoglobin
0.652
1.24 (0.49-3.11)
0.955
0.97 (0.38-2.50)
NLR
0.611
1.25 (0.53-2.90)
0.607
1.24 (0.54-2.86)
PLR
0.563
1.30 (0.53-3.18)
0.197
1.78 (0.74-4.27)
Albumin
0.060
0.42 (0.17-1.04)
0.021
0.34 (0.14-0.85)
CRP
0.173
1.88 (0.76-4.68)
0.181
1.85 (0.75-4.55)
FDG uptake
0.058
2.72 (0.97-7.65)
Tmax
0.215
1.33 (0.70-2.39)
BM SUV
0.945
0.94 (0.38-2.33)
0.597
0.80 (0.34-1.86)
BLR
0.001
6.42 (2.07-19.84)
0.005
7.67 (2.44-24.12)
OS
T stage
T1
1.00
1.00
T2
0.994
1.01 (0.13-8.41)
0.965
1.93 (0.29-13.05)
T3
0.537
1.78 (0.28-11.15)
0.500
1.93 (0.29-13.05)
T4
0.002
5.33 (1.88-15.14)
< 0.001
6.15 (2.18-17.34)
Lymph node metastasis
0.016
5.08 (1.36-18.94)
0.092
3.40 (0.82-14.11)
Tumor size
0.243
3.62 (0.42-31.35)
0.242
3.77 (0.41-34.80)
Tumor involvement of resection margin
0.194
3.16 (0.56-17.93)
0.209
3.13 (0.53-18.54)
Hemoglobin
0.026
0.32 (0.11-0.87)
0.463
0.46 (0.14-1.57)
PLR
0.741
0.82 (0.25-2.66)
0.896
0.92 (0.29-2.99)
Albumin
0.759
0.84 (0.27-2.61)
0.675
0.78 (0.24-2.52)
FDG uptake
0.197
4.29 (0.47-39.12)
Tmax
0.059
2.89 (0.96-8.72)
BLR
0.025
10.39 (1.34-80.33)
0.022
10.87 (1.42-83.31)
Citation: Lee JW, Lee MS, Chung IK, Son MW, Cho YS, Lee SM. Clinical implication of FDG uptake of bone marrow on PET/CT in gastric cancer patients with surgical resection. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(13): 2385-2395