Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2017; 23(13): 2346-2354
Published online Apr 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i13.2346
Published online Apr 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i13.2346
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study participants n (%)
Baseline characteristics (n = 1678) | |
Age (yr) (mean ± SD) | 50.42 ± 9.93 |
< 65 | 1518 (90.5) |
≥ 65 | 160 (9.5) |
Gender | |
Male/female | 1012 (60.3)/666 (39.7) |
Obesity indices (mean ± SD) | |
BMI (kg/m2) | 23.92 ± 2.96 |
WHR (n =1674) | 0.90 ± 0.08 |
WC (cm) (n =1676) | 86.95 ± 8.03 |
VAT volume (cm3) | 905.29 ± 475.22 |
SAT volume (cm3) | 1707.72 ± 576.55 |
History of abdominal surgery | |
Gynecological surgery | 231 (13.8) |
Gastrectomy | 163 (9.7) |
Other abdominal surgery | 5 (0.3) |
Constipation | |
Yes/no | 182 (10.8)/1496 (89.2) |
Experience | |
Attending physicians/Fellow | 1039 (61.9)/639 (38.1) |
Bowel preparation | |
Excellent to fair/Poor to inadequate | 1209 (72.1)/469 (27.9) |
Diverticulosis on colonoscopy | |
Yes/no | 95 (5.7)/1583 (94.3) |
CIT (min) | |
Median CIT (range) | 7 (2-56) (IQR, 5-10) |
Mean CIT (SD)1 | 8.58 ± 5.29 |
≤ 10 min | 1278 (76.2) |
> 10 min | 400 (23.8) |
Table 2 Cecal insertion time according to study variables, with odd ratios estimated by multivariable logistic regression analysis n (%)
Cecal insertion time (min) | P value | Multivariate logistic regression analysis | P value | ||
≤ 10 (n = 1278) | > 10 (n = 400) | OR (95%CI) | |||
Age (yr) | 0.125 | ||||
< 65 | 1164 (76.7) | 354 (23.3) | |||
≥ 65 | 114 (71.3) | 46 (28.7) | |||
Gender | 0.001 | ||||
Male | 800 (79.1) | 212 (20.9) | Ref | 0.047 | |
Female | 478 (71.8) | 188 (28.2) | 1.29 (1.00-1.67) | ||
Obesity indices | |||||
BMI (kg/m2) | < 0.001 | ||||
< 23 | 457 (72.2) | 176 (27.8)a | 1.62 (1.16-2.25) | 0.004 | |
23-24.9 | 388 (83.6) | 76 (16.4)b | Ref | ||
≥ 25 | 433 (74.5) | 148 (25.5) | 1.80 (1.31-2.49) | < 0.001 | |
WHR (n = 1674) | 0.060 | ||||
Normal (≤ 0.9 for men, ≤ 0.8 for women) | 257 (72.4) | 98 (27.6) | |||
High | 1018 (77.2) | 301 (22.8) | |||
WC (cm) (n = 1676) | 0.316 | ||||
Normal (≤ 102 cm for men, ≤ 88 cm for women) | 1098 (76.6) | 335 (23.4) | |||
High | 179 (73.7) | 64 (26.3) | |||
VAT volume (cm3) | < 0.001 | ||||
< 500 | 237 (68.3) | 110 (31.7)c | 1.50 (1.09-2.07) | 0.013 | |
500-1499 | 906 (78.9) | 242 (21.1) | Ref | ||
≥ 1500 | 135 (73.8) | 48 (26.2) | 1.27 (0.86-1.88) | 0.223 | |
SAT volume (cm3) | 0.848 | ||||
< 1000 | 107 (78.1) | 30 (21.9) | |||
1000-1999 | 831 (75.9) | 264 (24.1) | |||
≥ 2000 | 340 (76.2) | 106 (23.8) | |||
History of abdominal surgery | 0.626 | ||||
No | 1077 (76.4) | 333 (23.6) | |||
Yes | 201 (75.0) | 67 (25.0) | |||
Constipation | 0.112 | ||||
No | 1148 (76.7) | 348 (23.3) | |||
Yes | 130 (71.4) | 52 (28.6) | |||
Experience | < 0.001 | ||||
Attending physicians | 833 (80.2) | 206 (19.8) | Ref | ||
Fellow | 445 (69.6) | 194 (30.4) | 1.73 (1.38-2.19) | < 0.001 | |
Bowel preparation | 0.919 | ||||
Excellent to fair | 920 (76.1) | 289 (23.9) | |||
Poor to inadequate | 358 (76.3) | 111 (23.7) | |||
Diverticulosis | 0.099 | ||||
No | 1199 (75.7) | 384 (24.3) | |||
Yes | 79 (83.2) | 16 (16.8) |
Table 3 Cecal insertion time according to study variables, by gender, with P values estimated by univariable analysis n (%)
Male (n = 1012) | Female (n = 666) | |||||
Cecal insertion time (min) | P value | Cecal insertion time (min) | P value | |||
≤ 10 (n = 800) | > 10 (n = 212) | ≤ 10 (n = 478) | > 10 (n = 188) | |||
Age (yr) | 0.089 | 0.619 | ||||
< 65 | 726 (90.8) | 184 (86.8) | 438 (91.6) | 170 (90.4) | ||
≥ 65 | 74 (9.3) | 28 (13.2) | 40 (8.4) | 18 (9.6) | ||
Obesity indices | ||||||
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.007 | 0.013 | ||||
< 23 | 202 (25.3) | 58 (27.4) | 255 (53.3) | 118 (62.8)b | ||
23-24.9 | 261 (32.6) | 46 (21.7)a | 127 (26.6) | 30 (16.0) | ||
≥ 25 | 337 (42.1) | 108 (50.9) | 96 (20.1) | 40 (21.3) | ||
WHR | 0.414 | 0.332 | ||||
Normal | 118 (14.8) | 36 (17.1) | 139 (29.1) | 62 (33.0) | ||
High | 680 (85.2) | 175 (82.9) | 338 (70.9) | 126 (67.0) | ||
WC (cm) | 0.396 | 0.508 | ||||
Normal | 768 (96.1) | 201 (94.8) | 330 (69.0) | 134 (71.7) | ||
High | 31 (3.9) | 11 (5.2) | 148 (31.0) | 53 (28.3) | ||
VAT volume (cm3) | 0.123 | 0.020 | ||||
< 500 | 73 (9.1) | 24 (11.3) | 164 (34.3) | 86 (45.7)c | ||
500-1499 | 606 (75.8) | 146 (68.9) | 300 (62.8) | 96 (51.1) | ||
≥ 1500 | 121 (15.1) | 42 (19.8) | 14 (2.9) | 6 (3.2) | ||
SAT volume (cm3) | 0.511 | 0.082 | ||||
< 1000 | 90 (11.3) | 23 (10.8) | 17 (3.6) | 7 (3.7) | ||
1000-1999 | 575 (71.9) | 146 (68.9) | 256 (53.6) | 118 (62.8) | ||
≥ 2000 | 135 (16.9) | 43 (20.3) | 205 (42.9) | 63 (33.5) | ||
History of abdominal surgery | 0.087 | 0.213 | ||||
No | 687 (85.9) | 172 (81.1) | 390 (81.6) | 161 (85.6) | ||
Yes | 113 (14.1) | 40 (18.9) | 88 (18.4) | 27 (14.4) | ||
Constipation | 0.480 | 0.350 | ||||
No | 740 (92.5) | 193 (91.0) | 408 (85.4) | 155 (82.4) | ||
Yes | 60 (7.5) | 19 (9.0) | 70 (14.6) | 33 (17.6) | ||
Experience | < 0.001 | 0.015 | ||||
Attending physicians | 552 (69.0) | 115 (54.2) | 281 (58.8) | 91 (48.4) | ||
Fellow | 248 (31.0) | 97 (45.8) | 197 (41.2) | 97 (51.6) | ||
Bowel preparation | 0.561 | 0.462 | ||||
Excellent to fair | 561 (70.1) | 153 (72.2) | 359 (75.1) | 136 (72.3) | ||
Poor to inadequate | 239 (29.9) | 59 (27.8) | 119 (24.9) | 52 (27.7) | ||
Diverticulosis | 0.135 | 0.966 | ||||
No | 734 (91.8) | 201 (94.8) | 465 (97.3) | 183 (97.3) | ||
Yes | 66 (8.3) | 11 (5.2) | 13 (2.7) | 5 (2.7) |
Table 4 Predictive parameters of prolonged cecal insertion time according to gender by multivariable logistic regression analysis when body mass index and visceral adipose tissue volume were considered simultaneously or separately
OR | 95%CI | P value | OR | 95%CI | P value | OR | 95%CI | P value | ||
Male | BMI (kg/m2) | |||||||||
< 23 | 1.58 | 1.00-2.50 | 0.049 | 1.69 | 1.10-2.60 | 0.017 | ||||
23-24.9 | Ref | Ref | ||||||||
≥ 25 | 1.82 | 1.22-2.71 | 0.003 | 1.88 | 1.28-2.75 | 0.001 | ||||
VAT volume (cm3) | ||||||||||
< 500 | 1.40 | 0.80-2.43 | 0.236 | 1.41 | 0.86-2.33 | 0.178 | ||||
500-1499 | Ref | Ref | ||||||||
≥ 1500 | 1.24 | 0.81-1.90 | 0.323 | 1.42 | 0.96-2.12 | 0.082 | ||||
Experience | ||||||||||
Attending physicians | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||||||
Fellow | 1.93 | 1.41-2.63 | < 0.001 | 1.92 | 1.41-2.63 | < 0.001 | 1.88 | 1.38-2.57 | < 0.001 | |
Female | BMI (kg/m2) | |||||||||
< 23 | 1.66 | 1.02-2.69 | 0.041 | 1.96 | 1.25-3.10 | 0.004 | ||||
23-24.9 | Ref | Ref | ||||||||
≥ 25 | 1.79 | 1.02-3.13 | 0.042 | 1.71 | 0.99-2.96 | 0.053 | ||||
VAT volume (cm3) | ||||||||||
< 500 | 1.54 | 1.03-2.31 | 0.034 | 1.66 | 1.17-2.35 | 0.005 | ||||
500-1499 | Ref | Ref | ||||||||
≥ 1500 | 1.31 | 0.47-3.64 | 0.606 | 1.47 | 0.55-3.96 | 0.446 | ||||
Experience | ||||||||||
Attending physicians | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||||||
Fellow | 1.53 | 1.08-2.16 | 0.016 | 1.52 | 1.08-2.14 | 0.016 | 1.54 | 1.10-2.17 | 0.013 |
- Citation: Moon SY, Kim BC, Sohn DK, Han KS, Kim B, Hong CW, Park BJ, Ryu KH, Nam JH. Predictors for difficult cecal insertion in colonoscopy: The impact of obesity indices. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(13): 2346-2354
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i13/2346.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i13.2346