Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2017; 23(13): 2346-2354
Published online Apr 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i13.2346
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study participants n (%)
Baseline characteristics (n = 1678)
Age (yr) (mean ± SD)50.42 ± 9.93
< 651518 (90.5)
≥ 65160 (9.5)
Gender
Male/female1012 (60.3)/666 (39.7)
Obesity indices (mean ± SD)
BMI (kg/m2)23.92 ± 2.96
WHR (n =1674)0.90 ± 0.08
WC (cm) (n =1676)86.95 ± 8.03
VAT volume (cm3)905.29 ± 475.22
SAT volume (cm3)1707.72 ± 576.55
History of abdominal surgery
Gynecological surgery231 (13.8)
Gastrectomy163 (9.7)
Other abdominal surgery5 (0.3)
Constipation
Yes/no182 (10.8)/1496 (89.2)
Experience
Attending physicians/Fellow1039 (61.9)/639 (38.1)
Bowel preparation
Excellent to fair/Poor to inadequate1209 (72.1)/469 (27.9)
Diverticulosis on colonoscopy
Yes/no95 (5.7)/1583 (94.3)
CIT (min)
Median CIT (range)7 (2-56) (IQR, 5-10)
Mean CIT (SD)18.58 ± 5.29
≤ 10 min1278 (76.2)
> 10 min400 (23.8)
Table 2 Cecal insertion time according to study variables, with odd ratios estimated by multivariable logistic regression analysis n (%)
Cecal insertion time (min)
P valueMultivariate logistic regression analysisP value
≤ 10 (n = 1278)> 10 (n = 400)OR (95%CI)
Age (yr)0.125
< 651164 (76.7)354 (23.3)
≥ 65114 (71.3)46 (28.7)
Gender0.001
Male800 (79.1)212 (20.9)Ref0.047
Female478 (71.8)188 (28.2)1.29 (1.00-1.67)
Obesity indices
BMI (kg/m2)< 0.001
< 23457 (72.2)176 (27.8)a1.62 (1.16-2.25)0.004
23-24.9388 (83.6)76 (16.4)bRef
≥ 25433 (74.5)148 (25.5)1.80 (1.31-2.49)< 0.001
WHR (n = 1674)0.060
Normal (≤ 0.9 for men, ≤ 0.8 for women)257 (72.4)98 (27.6)
High1018 (77.2)301 (22.8)
WC (cm) (n = 1676)0.316
Normal (≤ 102 cm for men, ≤ 88 cm for women)1098 (76.6)335 (23.4)
High179 (73.7)64 (26.3)
VAT volume (cm3)< 0.001
< 500237 (68.3)110 (31.7)c1.50 (1.09-2.07)0.013
500-1499906 (78.9)242 (21.1)Ref
≥ 1500135 (73.8)48 (26.2)1.27 (0.86-1.88)0.223
SAT volume (cm3)0.848
< 1000107 (78.1)30 (21.9)
1000-1999831 (75.9)264 (24.1)
≥ 2000340 (76.2)106 (23.8)
History of abdominal surgery0.626
No1077 (76.4)333 (23.6)
Yes201 (75.0)67 (25.0)
Constipation0.112
No1148 (76.7)348 (23.3)
Yes130 (71.4)52 (28.6)
Experience< 0.001
Attending physicians833 (80.2)206 (19.8)Ref
Fellow445 (69.6)194 (30.4)1.73 (1.38-2.19)< 0.001
Bowel preparation0.919
Excellent to fair920 (76.1)289 (23.9)
Poor to inadequate358 (76.3)111 (23.7)
Diverticulosis0.099
No1199 (75.7)384 (24.3)
Yes79 (83.2)16 (16.8)
Table 3 Cecal insertion time according to study variables, by gender, with P values estimated by univariable analysis n (%)
Male (n = 1012)
Female (n = 666)
Cecal insertion time (min)
P valueCecal insertion time (min)
P value
≤ 10 (n = 800)> 10 (n = 212)≤ 10 (n = 478)> 10 (n = 188)
Age (yr)0.0890.619
< 65726 (90.8)184 (86.8)438 (91.6)170 (90.4)
≥ 6574 (9.3)28 (13.2)40 (8.4)18 (9.6)
Obesity indices
BMI (kg/m2)0.0070.013
< 23202 (25.3)58 (27.4)255 (53.3)118 (62.8)b
23-24.9261 (32.6)46 (21.7)a127 (26.6)30 (16.0)
≥ 25337 (42.1)108 (50.9)96 (20.1)40 (21.3)
WHR0.4140.332
Normal118 (14.8)36 (17.1)139 (29.1)62 (33.0)
High680 (85.2)175 (82.9)338 (70.9)126 (67.0)
WC (cm)0.3960.508
Normal768 (96.1)201 (94.8)330 (69.0)134 (71.7)
High31 (3.9)11 (5.2)148 (31.0)53 (28.3)
VAT volume (cm3)0.1230.020
< 50073 (9.1)24 (11.3)164 (34.3)86 (45.7)c
500-1499606 (75.8)146 (68.9)300 (62.8)96 (51.1)
≥ 1500121 (15.1)42 (19.8)14 (2.9)6 (3.2)
SAT volume (cm3)0.5110.082
< 100090 (11.3)23 (10.8)17 (3.6)7 (3.7)
1000-1999575 (71.9)146 (68.9)256 (53.6)118 (62.8)
≥ 2000135 (16.9)43 (20.3)205 (42.9)63 (33.5)
History of abdominal surgery0.0870.213
No687 (85.9)172 (81.1)390 (81.6)161 (85.6)
Yes113 (14.1)40 (18.9)88 (18.4)27 (14.4)
Constipation0.4800.350
No740 (92.5)193 (91.0)408 (85.4)155 (82.4)
Yes60 (7.5)19 (9.0)70 (14.6)33 (17.6)
Experience< 0.0010.015
Attending physicians552 (69.0)115 (54.2)281 (58.8)91 (48.4)
Fellow248 (31.0)97 (45.8)197 (41.2)97 (51.6)
Bowel preparation0.5610.462
Excellent to fair561 (70.1)153 (72.2)359 (75.1)136 (72.3)
Poor to inadequate239 (29.9)59 (27.8)119 (24.9)52 (27.7)
Diverticulosis0.1350.966
No734 (91.8)201 (94.8)465 (97.3)183 (97.3)
Yes66 (8.3)11 (5.2)13 (2.7)5 (2.7)
Table 4 Predictive parameters of prolonged cecal insertion time according to gender by multivariable logistic regression analysis when body mass index and visceral adipose tissue volume were considered simultaneously or separately
OR95%CIP valueOR95%CIP valueOR95%CIP value
MaleBMI (kg/m2)
< 231.581.00-2.500.0491.691.10-2.600.017
23-24.9RefRef
≥ 251.821.22-2.710.0031.881.28-2.750.001
VAT volume (cm3)
< 5001.400.80-2.430.2361.410.86-2.330.178
500-1499RefRef
≥ 15001.240.81-1.900.3231.420.96-2.120.082
Experience
Attending physiciansRefRefRef
Fellow1.931.41-2.63< 0.0011.921.41-2.63< 0.0011.881.38-2.57< 0.001
FemaleBMI (kg/m2)
< 231.661.02-2.690.0411.961.25-3.100.004
23-24.9RefRef
≥ 251.791.02-3.130.0421.710.99-2.960.053
VAT volume (cm3)
< 5001.541.03-2.310.0341.661.17-2.350.005
500-1499RefRef
≥ 15001.310.47-3.640.6061.470.55-3.960.446
Experience
Attending physiciansRefRefRef
Fellow1.531.08-2.160.0161.521.08-2.140.0161.541.10-2.170.013