Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2017; 23(11): 2060-2067
Published online Mar 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i11.2060
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease patients
Background factorsThe number of applicable subjects for the factor
Erosive esophagitis/NERD19/20
Gender (male/female)17/22
Atrophic gastritis (+/-)20/19
Hiatal hernia (+/-)24/15
Alcohol consumption habit (+/-/unknown)16/21/2
Smoking habit (+/-/unknown)4/33/2
PPI types (omeprazole/lansoprazole/rabeprazole/unknown)5/11/22/1
PPI dose (half/full/double/unknown)8/26/4/1
Concomitant drug against GERD (+/-)14/25
Ca antagonist (+/-)15/24
ASA (+/-)7/32
NSAIDs (+/-)2/37
CYP2C19 genotype (RM/IM/PM/unknown)13/20/5/1
Maintenance PPI therapy period (< 6 mo/6-12 mo/> 12 mo)3/1/35
Age (mean ± SD)68.5 ± 11.9
BMI (mean ± SD)22.7 ± 3.1
Table 2 Bivariate analysis of background factors associated with frequency scale for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease scores in the erosive esophagitis patients
Background factorsFSSG scores of the applicable subjects for the factor [mean ± SD (the number)]FSSG scores of the inapplicable subjects for the factor [mean ± SD (the number)]P value
Gender (male)11.4 ± 8.0 (9)10.8 ± 8.1 (10)0.9673
Atrophic gastritis9.0 ± 9.0 (7)12.3 ± 7.2 (12)0.2696
Hiatal hernia9.1 ± 7.2 (12)14.6 ± 8.2 (7)0.0817
Alcohol consumption habit10.8 ± 8.1 (10)11.4 ± 8.0 (9)0.6225
Smoking habit10.3 ± 8.7 (3)11.3 ± 8.0 (16)0.9552
Use of half dose of PPI5.5 ± 0.7 (2)11.3 ± 8.1 (16)0.5251
Use of rabeprazole11.2 ± 8.8 (12)9.7 ± 6.1 (6)0.9625
Concomitant drug against GERD15.6 ± 8.5 (8)7.8 ± 5.6 (11)0.0512
Use of Ca antagonist10.2 ± 5.7 (6)11.5 ± 8.8 (13)1.0000
Use of ASA4.0 ± 2.8 (2)11.9 ± 7.9 (17)0.1610
Use of NSAIDs8.0 (1)11.3 ± 8.0 (18)1.0000
CYP2C19 RM genotype16.7 ± 8.6 (7)7.8 ± 5.4 (12)0.0415
Ageρ = -0.40830.0826
BMIρ = -0.14900.5428
Table 3 Bivariate analysis of background factors associated with frequency scale for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease scores in the non-erosive reflux disease patients
Background factorsFSSG scores of the applicable subjects for the factor [mean ± SD (the number)]FSSG scores of the inapplicable subjects for the factor [mean ± SD (the number)]P value
Gender (male)6.5 ± 5.2 (8)11.3 ± 6.2 (12)0.0807
Atrophic gastritis9.6 ± 6.7 (13)9.0 ± 5.4 (7)0.9365
Hiatal hernia7.1 ± 5.0 (12)12.9 ± 6.4 (8)0.1510
Alcohol consumption habit9.0 ± 6.8 (6)10.2 ± 6.4 (12)0.4221
Smoking habit6.0 (1)10.0 ± 6.5 (17)0.6270
Use of half dose of PPI7.2 ± 5.7 (6)10.4 ± 6.3 (14)0.2454
Use of rabeprazole11.8 ± 7.0 (10)7.0 ± 4.3 (10)0.2095
Concomitant drug against GERD10.5 ± 6.7 (6)8.9 ± 6.1 (14)0.5896
Use of Ca antagonist9.0 ± 6.2 (9)9.7 ± 6.4 (11)0.5159
Use of ASA9.6 ± 6.0 (5)9.3 ± 6.4 (15)0.8262
Use of NSAIDs18.0 (1)8.9 ± 6.0 (19)0.2568
CYP2C19 RM genotype5.5 ± 1.0 (6)11.8 ± 6.3 (13)0.0151
Ageρ = 0.09630.6863
BMIρ = -0.37140.1069

  • Citation: Kawara F, Fujita T, Morita Y, Uda A, Masuda A, Saito M, Ooi M, Ishida T, Kondo Y, Yoshida S, Okuno T, Yano Y, Yoshida M, Kutsumi H, Hayakumo T, Yamashita K, Hirano T, Hirai M, Azuma T. Factors associated with residual gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in patients receiving proton pump inhibitor maintenance therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(11): 2060-2067
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i11/2060.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i11.2060