Takatsu Y, Fukunaga Y, Hamasaki S, Ogura A, Nagata J, Nagasaki T, Akiyoshi T, Konishi T, Fujimoto Y, Nagayama S, Ueno M. Recurrent colorectal cancer after endoscopic resection when additional surgery was recommended. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(7): 2336-2341 [PMID: 26900295 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2336]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Yosuke Fukunaga, Gastroenterological Center, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan. yosuke.fukunaga@jfcr.or.jp
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2016; 22(7): 2336-2341 Published online Feb 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2336
Table 1 Characteristics of patients and primary tumors
Age
BMI
Pathological data
Case
(yr)
Sex
ASA
(kg/m2)
Location
Invasion depth
Differentiation
ly
v
VM
Budding
1
39
F
1
19.7
Rectum
sm (≥ 1000 μm)
Well
+
+
-
Grade 2
2
43
M
1
19.4
Rectum
sm (≥ 1000 μm)
Well
+
+
+
Unknown
3
71
F
1
17.0
Rectum
sm (< 1000 μm)
Well
+
+
-
Unknown
4
75
M
1
25.3
Transverse
sm (= 1000 μm)
Well
-
-
-
Grade 0
5
76
M
2
21.7
Rectum
un clear
Moderate
-
-
+
Grade 0
6
42
M
1
18.8
Rectum
sm (≥ 1000 μm)
Well
+
+
-
Grade 0
7
74
M
2
25.4
Rectum
sm (≥ 1000 μm)
Moderate
-
+
-
Grade 3
8
49
M
2
22.4
Sigmoid
sm (≥ 1000 μm)
Moderate
+
-
-
Grade 1
Table 2 Follow up and recurrence after endoscopic resection
Use of adjuvant therapy
Case
After ESD
Follow up interval
Recurrence pattern
Time to recurrence
1
-
3 mo
Distant metastasis (lung, PALN)
8 mo
2
-
Every year
Local + regional lymphnode
10 mo
3
-
No follow
Distant metastasis (lung, liver)
7 yr
4
-
8 mo
Local
4 yr
5
-
No follow
Local + regional lymphnode
18 mo
6
XELOX 6 mo
No follow
Local
2 yr
7
-
Every year
Local + regional lymphnode
4 yr
8
-
No follow
Peritoneal dissemination
4 yr
Table 3 Surgical outcomes
Case
Surgical procedures
Operating time
Estimated blood loss
Harvested
Lymphadenectomy
Complication
(min)
(mL)
lymph nodes
1
Staging laparoscopy
139
10
-
-
-
2
Laparoscopic LAR
205
10
15
D3
Enteritis
3
Laparoscopic Sigmoid colostomy
-
-
-
-
-
4
Laparoscopic TCR
339
135
12
D2
-
5
Laparoscopic LAR
440
285
10
D3
Enteritis
6
Laparoscopic APR
403
200
18
D3
-
7
Laparoscopic LAR
227
20
13
D3
-
8
Laparoscopic SCR+
230
350
-
-
-
Excision of peritoneal dissemination
Table 4 Postoperative outcomes
Case
Pathological data
Survival outcome
Last follow-up
Invasion depth
ly
v
ew
ow
aw
Lymphnode metastasis, n
Surgical margins
Therapy after surgery
Recurrence
(alive/death)
(mo)
1
R2
Systemic chemotherapy
Death
25
2
a
2
0
-
-
-
2
R0
Follow-up
-
Alive
106
3
R2
Systemic chemotherapy
Death
12
4
sm (700 μm)
0
0
-
-
-
0
R0
Follow-up
-
Alive
24
5
a
1
1
+
-
-
1
R1
Adjuvant chemotherapy
-
Alive
3
6
a
1
1
-
-
-
0
R0
Follow-up
-
Alive
7
7
a
0
1
-
-
-
1
R0
Adjuvant chemotherapy
-
Alive
23
8
Adenocarcinoma (recurrence of sigmoid colon cancer)
R0
Follow-up
-
Alive
33
Citation: Takatsu Y, Fukunaga Y, Hamasaki S, Ogura A, Nagata J, Nagasaki T, Akiyoshi T, Konishi T, Fujimoto Y, Nagayama S, Ueno M. Recurrent colorectal cancer after endoscopic resection when additional surgery was recommended. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(7): 2336-2341