Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2016; 22(7): 2219-2241
Published online Feb 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2219
Published online Feb 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2219
Ref. | Methods | N° of Pts. | Diagnostic criteria | Results in IBS in comparison with healthy subjects |
Dlugosz et al[38] | qPCR (small bowel) | 35 | Rome II | No differences |
Balsari et al[39] | ↓Coliforms | |||
↓Lactobacilli | ||||
↓ Bifidobacteria | ||||
Si et al[40] | Culture | 25 | Rome II | ↓Bifidobacteria |
↑Enterobacteriaceae | ||||
Malinen et al[41] | qPCR | 27 | Rome II | ↑Veillonellain C-IBS |
↓Lactobacillus in D-IBS | ||||
Mättö et al[42] | Culture/DGGE | 26 | Rome II | ↑ Aerobes |
Temporal instability | ||||
Swidsinski et al[43] | FISH | 20 | A-IBS | ↑ Mucosal bacteria |
C-IBS | ↑Eubacteriumrectale | |||
D-IBS | ↑Clostridium coccoides | |||
Maukonen et al[44] | PCR-DGGE | 16 | A-IBS | Higher instability of the bacterial population |
C-IBS | ↑Clostridial groups | |||
D-IBS | ||||
Kassinen et al[45] | 16S ribosomal RNA gene cloning | 24 | Rome II | Significant differences in several bacterial genera belonging to the genera Coprococcus, Collinsella and Coprobacillus |
Lyra et al[46] | 16S ribosomal RNA gene cloning | 20 | A-IBS C-IBS D-IBS | ↑Clostridium thermosuccinogenes in D-IBS ↑Ruminococcus torques in D-IBS ↑Ruminococcus bromii-like in C-IBS |
Krogius-Kurikka et al[47] | 16S ribosomal RNA gene cloning | 10 | Rome II | ↑Proteobacteria and Firmicutes in D-IBS |
↓Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes in D-IBS | ||||
Kerckhoffs et al[48] | FISH, PCR | 41 | A-IBS | ↓Bifidobacteria |
C-IBS | ||||
D-IBS | ||||
Carroll et al[49] | 16S ribosomal RNA gene cloning | 2 | Rome III | ↑Bacteroidetes↑Proteobacteria |
Salonen et al[50] Review | ||||
Tana et al[51] | Culture | 26 | Rome II | ↑Lactobacillus |
qPCR | ↑ Veillonella | |||
Carroll et al[52] | qPCR | 10 | Rome III | ↓Aerobicbacteria |
D-IBS | ↑Lactobacillus | |||
Codling et al[53] | 16S rRNA-DGGE | 47 | Rome II | ↓Bacterial richness |
Ponnusamy et al[54] | rRNA-specific 16S rRNA-DGGE | 54 | Rome II | Same total bacterial quantity Higher diversity of Bacteroidetes and Lactobacilli |
PCR | Lower diversity of Bifidobacter and Clostridium coccoides | |||
Kerckhoffs et al[55] | 16S rRNA-DGGE | 37 | Rome II | ↑Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
qPCR | ||||
Rajilić-Stojanović et al[56] | 16S rRNA | 62 | Rome II | ↑Ratio of the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes |
qPCR | ↑Dorea, Ruminococcus, Clostridium spp | |||
↓Bacteroidetes, Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium spp | ||||
Carroll et al[57] | 16S rRNA | 16 | Rome III D-IBS | Lower biodiversity of microbes |
Carroll et al[58] | 16S rRNA | 23 | D-IBS | ↓Bacterial richness |
↑Enterobacteriaceae | ||||
↑Proteobacteria | ||||
↓Faecalibacterium | ||||
Parkes et al[59] | FISH | 47 | Rome III | More total bacteria numbers |
↑Bacteroides, Clostridia coccoides-Eubacteriumrectale | ||||
Jeffery et al[60] | 16S rRNA | 37 | Rome II | A sub-group of IBS showed normal-like microbiota |
A sub-group of IBS showed large microbiota-wide changes with ↑Firmicutes and ↓Bacteroidetes | ||||
Chassard et al[61] | FISH/16S rDNA | 14 | Rome II | ↑Enterobacteriaceae |
Functional approaches | Rome III | ↑Suphate-reducing bacteria | ||
C-IBS | ↓Lactic acid bacteria population (bifidobacteria and to a lesser extent, lactobacilli) | |||
König et al[62] Review | ||||
Sundin et al[63] | 16s rRNA | 19 | Rome III | ↑Bacteroidetes in the PI-IBS group (13 patients) ↑Firmicutes (more specifically Clostridium in IBS) |
Authors' statement | Parameter scored | Conclusion | Grade of evidence for effect | Ref. |
1 | Global symptom assessment | Specific probiotics help relieve overall symptom burden in some patients with IBS | High | [147,149,150,152,156-157,169, 174,176-178] |
2 | Global symptom assessment | Specific probiotics help relieve overall symptom burden in some patients with C-IBS | Low | [147,156-157] |
3 | Global symptom assessment | Specific probiotics help relieve overall symptom burden in some patients with D-IBS | Moderate | [147,149,174-175] |
4 | Abdominal Pain | Specific probiotics help reduce abdominal pain in some patients with IBS | High | [145,147,149-150,152,155-157, 168-169,174-119] |
5 | Bloating/distension | Specific probiotics help reduce bloating/distension in some patients with IBS | Moderate | [147,149-150,155-156,168-170, 174-177,179-183] |
6 | Flatus | Probiotics tested to date do not help reduce flatus in patients with IBS | Low | [147,149-150,156,168,174-175, 178-179,184] |
7 | Constipation | Specific probiotics may help reduce constipation in some patients with IBS | Low | [155-156,183,185] |
8 | Bowel habit | Specific probiotics help improve frequency and/or consistency of bowel movements in some patients with IBS | Moderate | [145,147,149-150,152,155-157, 168-170,174-180,182,185-186,188-189] |
9 | Diarrhoea | Probiotics tested to date do not reduce diarrhea in patients with IBS | Very low | [174,179,181-183,185,187] |
12 | Health-related quality of life | With specific probiotics, improvement of symptoms has been shown to lead to improvement in some aspects of health-related quality of life | Moderate | [147,150,152,155,169-170,174,176-177,179-180,183-184,186] |
- Citation: Distrutti E, Monaldi L, Ricci P, Fiorucci S. Gut microbiota role in irritable bowel syndrome: New therapeutic strategies. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(7): 2219-2241
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i7/2219.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2219