Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2016; 22(5): 1844-1853
Published online Feb 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1844
Published online Feb 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1844
Patients, n | 84 |
Sex | 50 males |
34 females | |
Age (yr), median | 71 (2-98) |
Clip type | |
12/6T | 77 |
14/6T | 24 |
OTSCs (n total) | 101 |
Indication for OTSC placement | |
Upper GI bleeding | 41 |
Lower GI bleeding | 3 |
Gastrointestinal perforation | 7 |
Fistula | 3 |
Bleeding prevention | 12 |
Perforation prevention | 18 |
Technical success | 78/84 (92.85%) |
Clinical success | 75/84 (89.28%) |
Indication | n | Technical success | Need for surgery | Death due to relapse | Death due to other cause |
Perforation closure | |||||
Incomplete perforation (laceration of mucosa/inner muscle layer) | |||||
After mechanical stress at the level of the rectosigmoid | 3 | 3 | No | No | No |
After balloon dilation of pyloric stenosis | 1 | 1 | Yes | No | No |
Perforation | |||||
After colonic EMR | 1 | 1 | Yes | No | No |
Due to colonic methane gas explosion | 1 | 1 | Yes | No | No |
Intraoperative during cholecystectomy; perforation of a large duodenal diverticulum | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
Prevention of secondary perforation after resective techniques | |||||
EMR | |||||
Esophageal EMR | 2 | 2 | No | No | No |
Gastric EMR | 2 | 2 | No | No | No |
Duodenal EMR | 2 | 2 | No | No | No |
Cecal EMR | 2 | 2 | No | No | No |
EMR ascending colon | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
Sigmoid EMR | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
ESD | |||||
Esophageal ESD | 3 | 3 | No | No | No |
Rectal ESD | 5 | 5 | No | No | No |
Hemostasis severe bleeding | |||||
Upper GI bleeding | |||||
Acute ulcer bleeding | |||||
Forrest Ia | 9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
Forrest Ib | 3 | 3 | No | No | No |
Forrest IIa | 23 | 23 | No | No | 4 |
Forrest IIb | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Severe bleeding at GE junction after balloon dilation for achalasia | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
Gastric adenocarcinoma | 1 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
Gastric lymphoma | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
Lower GI bleeding | |||||
Severe bleeding from rectal ulcer | |||||
Forrest Ia | 2 | 2 | No | No | No |
Forrest IIb | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
Prevention of secondary bleeding after resective techniques | |||||
EMR | |||||
Gastric EMR | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
Duodenal EMR | 3 | 3 | No | No | No |
Colorectal EMR | 3 | 3 | No | No | No |
ESD | |||||
Esophageal ESD | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
Rectal ESD | 4 | 4 | No | No | No |
Fistula closure | |||||
After PEG removal | 2 | 2 | No | No | No |
After dilation of pseudocyst access, false tract | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
- Citation: Wedi E, Gonzalez S, Menke D, Kruse E, Matthes K, Hochberger J. One hundred and one over-the-scope-clip applications for severe gastrointestinal bleeding, leaks and fistulas. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(5): 1844-1853
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i5/1844.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1844