Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2016; 22(47): 10304-10315
Published online Dec 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10304
Published online Dec 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10304
Table 1 Rates of clinical response after fecal microbial transplant for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection by fecal microbial transplant method
FMT method | Resolution of symptoms | Studies/total patients analyzed |
Upper gastrointestinal tract (Nasogastric/nasoduodenal/nasojejunal) tube | 77% | 7/187 |
Enema | 86% | 6/264 |
Colonoscopy | 90% | 11/257 |
Upper gastrointestinal tract + colonoscopy | 100% | 1/27 |
Table 2 Published pediatric fecal microbial transplant studies for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection
Ref | AGE (yr) | n | FMT route | Response rate |
Hourigan et al[22], 2015 | 6-17 | 8 | Colonoscopy | 100% |
Kronman et al[55], 2015 | 6-17 | 10 | NG | 90% |
Wang et al[58], 2015 | 1 | 1 | NJ | 100% |
Kelly et al[10], 2014 | 6-16 | 5 | Not specified | 89% (whole series) |
Pierog et al[56], 2014 | 1-21 | 6 | Colonoscopy | 100% |
Russell et al[57], 2014 | 1-21 | 10 | NG (2); Colonoscopy (8) | 90% |
Walia et al[59], 2014 | 1-2 | 2 | Colonoscopy | 100% |
Rubin et al[60], 2013 | 6-8 | 2 | NG (64); EGD (7); Gastrostomy (previously placed) (4) | 50% |
Kahn et al[44], 2012 | 1 | 1 | Colonoscopy | 100% |
Table 3 Rates of resolution of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection using fresh vs frozen fecal microbial transplant
Table 4 Published pediatric fecal microbial transplant case series for inflammatory bowel disease
Ref. | AGE (yr) | Diagnosis, n | FMT protocol | Clinical response criteria | Response rate (%) |
Kunde et al[32], 2013 | 7-21 | 9, UC | Serial enemas for 5 d | Decrease in PUCAI by > 15 points after FMT | 7/9 clinical response at 1 wk (78) |
6/9 maintained response at 4 wk (67) | |||||
Kellermayer et al[33], 2015 | 14-16 | 3, UC | Serial enemas and colonoscopy over 6-12 wk | PUCAI < 35 | 3/3 endoscopic remission at 2 wk (100) |
3/3 histologic remission at 2 wk (100) | |||||
3/3 clinical response at 4 wk (100) | |||||
3/3 withdrawal of all immunotherapy at 15 wk (100) | |||||
Suskind et al[34], 2015 | 12-19 | 9, CD | Single FMT | PCDAI < 10 | 7/9 clinical response at 2 wk (78) |
via NGT | 5/9 maintained response at 6, and 12 wk (56) | ||||
Suskind et al[35], 2015 | 13-16 | 4, UC | Single FMT | PUCAI < 10 | No clinical response (0) |
via NGT | No laboratory benefit |
Table 5 Study characteristics and outcomes of published adult cohort studies of fecal microbial transplant for inflammatory bowel disease
Ref. | Clinical outcome | Follow-up |
Wang et al[62], 2014 | Clinical remission (1/2: 1 mo, 3 mo); | 3 mo |
Clinical response (2/2: 1 wk) | ||
Kump et al[49], 2013 | Clinical remission (0/6: 90 d); | 3 mo |
Clinical response (6/6: 2 wk; 4/6: stool frequency increased: 30 d; 2/6 sustained improvement: 90 d); | ||
Total colectomy (1/6), total proctocolectomy (2/6) | ||
Wei et al[63], 2015 | Mayo score: decreased from 5.80 ± 1.87 to 1.50 ± 1.35 (P < 0.01) | 1 mo |
Angelberger et al[26], 2013 | Clinical remission (0/5: 12 wk); | 3 mo |
Clinical response (1/5: 12 wk); | ||
Further deterioration (2/5: 4 wk) | ||
Scaldaferri et al[64], 2015 | Clinical remission (2/8: 2 wk; 2/8: 6 wk; 3/8: 12 wk); | 3 mo |
Clinical response (2/8: 2 wk; 4/8: 6 wk; 4/8: 12 wk); | ||
Endoscopic response (2/6) | ||
Ren et al[65], 2015 | Mayo score: 11 patients achieved reduction of score | 1-7 mo |
Cui et al[50], 2015 | Clinical improvement and steroid-free remission: 8/14; | 3-18 mo |
Long-term remission: 4/14 | ||
Damman et al[66], 2015 | Clinical remission (1/6: 4 wk; 0/6: 3 mo); | Not reported |
Worsening symptoms (6/6: 3 mo); | ||
Histology score improvement (5/6: 4 wk) | ||
Borody et al[23], 2012 | Complete clinical remission: 42/62; | 3 mo |
Partial response: 15/62; Failure: 5/62; | ||
Normalization of mucosa: 8/21 | ||
Kump et al[49], 2013 | Mayo score decrease > 3 points (5/9: 90 d); | 1 mo |
Sustained mucosal healing: 1/9; | ||
Failure to sustain clinical improvement: 4/9 | ||
Landy et al[67], 2013 | Clinical remission: 0/8; | 1 mo |
Improvement in Cleveland Global Quality of Life score: 0/8 |
Table 6 Study characteristics and outcomes of published randomized controlled trials of fecal microbial transplant for inflammatory bowel disease
Group | Moayyedi et al (2015) | Rossen et al (2015) |
n (active/placebo) | 75 (38/37) | 48 (23/25) |
Population | Adult patients; Mild-moderate UC | Adult patients; Mild-moderate UC |
Active arm | 50 mL enema (8 g healthy donor stool) | 500 mL nasoduodenal infusion (120 g healthy donor stool) |
Administered weekly × 6 wk | Administered at week 0, 3 | |
Control arm | Normal saline | Autologous FMT (patient’s stool) |
Inclusion of patients on Biologics | Yes, stable doses ≥ 12 wk | No |
Primary outcome | Clinical remission (partial Mayo endoscopic score < 3 and Mayo endo score = 0) at week 7 | Remission (SCCAI ≤ 2 + ≥ 1pt reduction in Mayo endoscopic score) at week 12 |
Clinical response (reduction in full Mayo score ≥ 3) | ||
Results | 9/38 (24%) treated with FMT vs 2/37 (5%) controls (P = 0.03) | 7/23 (30%) treated with FMT vs 5/25 (20%) controls (P = 0.51) |
Table 7 Clinical trials of fecal microbial transplant for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (registered through clinicaltrials.gov)
Location | Trial number | Diagnosis | Age (yr) | Donor | FMT route | Interven-tion | Protocol |
Hamilton, | NCT02487238 | UC | 6-17 | Anonymous | Enema | FMT, Saline | Retention enema; 2 × weekly × 6 wk; 33-wk follow up |
Canada | Randomized Single Blinded | ||||||
California, United States | NCT02291523 | UC | 7-2 | Accepting volunteers | Colonoscopic | FMT, Saline | Patients on high-dose 5-ASA; 1 × colonoscopic administration; 12-mo follow up |
Randomized Double Blinded | |||||||
Chongqing, China | NCT02335281 | UC/CD | 16-70 | Not specified | Nasojejunal | FMT, Mesalazine | Single nasojejunal administration; 1-yr follow up |
Randomized Single Blinded | |||||||
Texas, United States | NCT01947101 | UC | 12-20 | Anonymous | Colonoscopic /Enema | FMT | Colonoscopic administration for first treatment; subsequent periodic treatments over 1-year with enema administration |
Pennsylvania, United States | NCT02108821 | UC/CD | 2-22 | Family member | Colonoscopic | Open Label | Fresh stool sample; 1 ×, 1-h duration; 6-mo follow up |
FMT | |||||||
Michigan, United States | NCT01560819 | UC/CD | 7-21 | Family member | Enema | Open Label | 1-hour retention enema; daily × 5 d; 6-mo follow up |
FMT | |||||||
Jerusalem, Israel; | NCT02033408 | UC/CD | 2-75 | Not specified | Not specified | Open Label | Secondary treatment for antibiotic, corticosteroid failures; 3-yr follow up |
Toronto, Canada; | FMT | ||||||
Helsinki, Finland; | Open Label | ||||||
Napoli, Italy; | |||||||
Rome, Italy; | |||||||
Krakow, Poland; | |||||||
Malaga, Spain | |||||||
Michigan, United States | NCT01560819 | UC/CD | 7-21 | Family member/ | Enema | FMT | Retention enema; Administered daily × 5 d; 6-mo follow up |
Chosen by family | Open Label | ||||||
Turku, Finland | NCT01961492 | UC | 1-75 | Anonymous | Colonoscopic | FMT | Single colonoscopic administration; 1-yr follow up |
Open Label | |||||||
Jiangsu, China | NCT01793831 | UC/CD | 10-70 | Not specified | Nasogastric | FMT | Single nasogastric administration; 12-mo follow up |
Shaanxi, China | Open Label | ||||||
Jiangsu, China | NCT01790061 | UC | 10-70 | Not specified | Duodenal (gastroscopic) | FMT | 1-mo follow up |
Shaanxi, China | Open Label | Fresh, or frozen FMT administered via gastroscope | |||||
No prior biologic, immunomodulatory, corticosteroid therapy | |||||||
Jiangsu, China | NCT02560727 | UC | 10-70 | Not specified | Colonoscopic | Not specified | 12-mo follow up |
No prior biologic, immunomodulatory, corticosteroid therapy |
- Citation: Wang AY, Popov J, Pai N. Fecal microbial transplant for the treatment of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(47): 10304-10315
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i47/10304.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10304