Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2016; 22(44): 9803-9812
Published online Nov 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i44.9803
Published online Nov 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i44.9803
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Variables | n (%) | |
Age (yr) | ≤ 60 | 46 (25.6) |
> 60 | 134 (74.4) | |
Sex | Male | 169 (93.9) |
Female | 11 (6.1) | |
Smoking | No | 28 (15.6) |
Yes | 151 (84.4) | |
Histological grade | WD | 35 (19.4) |
MD | 119 (66.1) | |
PD and basaloid | 26 (14.4) | |
Localization | Upper | 7 (3.9) |
Middle | 44 (24.9) | |
Lower | 116 (65.5) | |
EGJ | 10 (5.6) | |
T | 1a | 16 (8.9) |
1b | 65 (36.1) | |
2 | 17 (9.4) | |
3 | 78 (43.3) | |
4 | 4 (2.2) | |
N | 0 | 92 (51.1) |
1 | 52 (28.9) | |
2 | 29 (16.1) | |
3 | 7 (3.9) | |
Stage | IA | 14 (7.8) |
IB | 49 (27.2) | |
IIA | 21 (11.7) | |
IIB | 32 (17.8) | |
IIIA | 37 (20.6) | |
IIIB | 19 (10.6) | |
IIIC | 8 (4.4) | |
Adjuvant therapy | No | 112 (67.8) |
Yes | 58 (32.2) | |
FGFR1 amplification | No amplification | 136 (78.6) |
Low amplification | 3 (1.7) | |
High amplification | 34 (19.7) | |
MYC amplification | No amplification | 77 (45.9) |
Low amplification | 20 (11.9) | |
High amplification | 71 (42.3) | |
MYC expression | 0 (none) | 74 (41.1) |
1 (weak) | 54 (30.0) | |
2 (moderate) | 41 (22.8) | |
3 (strong) | 11 (6.1) |
Table 2 Correlation among fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 amplification, MYC expression and clinicopathological features1
Variables | FGFR1, n (%) | MYC, n (%) | ||||
No amplification | Amplification | P value | No expression | Expression | P value | |
Age (yr) | ||||||
≤ 60 | 30/44 (68.2) | 14/44 (31.8) | 0.058 | 18/46 (39.1) | 28/46 (60.9) | 0.862 |
> 60 | 106/129 (82.2) | 23/129 (17.8) | 56/134 (41.8) | 78/134 (58.2) | ||
Smoking | ||||||
No | 21/28 (75) | 7/28 (25) | 0.619 | 12/28 (42.9) | 6/28 (57.1) | 0.836 |
Yes | 115/145 (79.3) | 30/145 (20.7) | 61/151 (40.4) | 90/151 (59.6) | ||
Histological grade | ||||||
WD | 29/34 (85.3) | 5/34 (14.7) | 0.350 | 17/35 (48.6) | 18/35 (51.4) | 0.267 |
MD | 90/117 (76.9) | 27/117 (23.1) | 43/119 (36.1) | 76/119 (63.9) | ||
PD | 11/16 (68.8) | 5/16 (31.2) | 10/18 (55.6) | 8/18 (44.4) | ||
Others | 6/6 (100) | 0/6 (0) | 4/8 (50) | 4/8 (50) | ||
Localization | ||||||
Upper | 6/7 (85.7) | 1/7 (14.3) | 0.981 | 4/7 (57.1) | 3/7 (42.9) | 0.688 |
Middle | 34/42 (81) | 8/42 (19) | 20/44 (45.5) | 24/44 (54.5) | ||
Lower | 86/111 (77.5) | 25/111 (22.5) | 45/116 (38.8) | 71/116 (61.2) | ||
EGJ | 8/10 (80) | 2/10 (20) | 4/10 (40) | 6/10 (60) | ||
T | ||||||
1 | 66/80 (82.5) | 14/80 (17.5) | 0.602 | 22/81 (27.2) | 59/81 (72.8) | < 0.001 |
2 | 12/16 (75) | 4/16 (25) | 6/17 (35.3) | 11/17 (64.7) | ||
3 | 55/73 (75.3) | 18/73 (24.7) | 43/78 (55.1) | 35/78 (44.9) | ||
4 | 3/4 (75) | 1/4 (25) | 3/4 (75) | 1/4 (24) | ||
N | ||||||
0 | 73/90 (81.1) | 17/90 (18.9) | 0.460 | 30/92 (32.6) | 62/92 (67.4) | 0.023 |
1-3 | 63/83 (75.9) | 20/83 (24.1) | 44/88 (50) | 44/88 (50) | ||
Stage | ||||||
I | 51/62 (82.3) | 11/62 (17.7) | 0.694 | 18/63 (28.6) | 45/64 (71.4) | < 0.001 |
II | 40/52 (76.9) | 12/52 (23.1) | 17/53 (32.1) | 36/53 (67.9) | ||
III | 45/59 (76.3) | 14/59 (23.7) | 39/64 (60.9) | 25/64 (39.1) |
Table 3 Correlation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 and MYC amplification status between the tumors of the primary and the metastatic lymph nodes, n (%)
Metastatic lymph nodes | Total | P value | |||
No amplification | Amplification | ||||
FGFR1 Primary tumor | No amplification | 42 (91.3) | 3 (6.7) | 45 (100) | < 0.001 |
Amplification | 4 (36.4) | 7 (63.6) | 11 (100) | ||
Total | 46 (82.1) | 10 (17.9) | 56 (100) | ||
MYC Primary tumor | No amplification | 17 (63.0) | 10 (37.0) | 27 (100) | 1.000 |
Amplification | 12 (60.0) | 8 (40.0) | 20 (100) | ||
Total | 29 (61.7) | 18 (38.3) | 47 (100) |
Table 4 Multivariate analysis for overall survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Variables | Category | Whole cohort | No adjuvant chemo- and/or radiotherapy | Adjuvant chemo- and/or radiotherapy | |||
HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | ||
Age (yr) | ≤ 60 vs > 60 | 1.805 (1.102-2.955) | 0.019 | 2.371 (1.088- 5.167) | 0.030 | 1.81 (0.896-3.656) | 0.098 |
T | 1, 2, 3, 4 | - | 0.005 | - | 0.091 | - | 0.009 |
1 vs 2 | 1.204 (0.523-2.773) | 0.663 | 1.589 (0.591-4.269) | 0.358 | 1.260 (0.251-6.324) | 0.779 | |
1 vs 3 | 2.373 (1.454-3.872) | 0.001 | 2.115 (1.126-3.973) | 0.020 | 4.136 (1.691-10.119) | 0.002 | |
1 vs 4 | 1.902 (0.550-6.575) | 0.310 | 0.632 (0.078-5.130) | 0.667 | 4.256 (0.820-22.092) | 0.085 | |
N | 0 vs 1-3 | 1.981 (1.275-3.077) | 0.002 | 2.351 (1.338-4.133) | 0.003 | 0.319 (0.125-0.814) | 0.017 |
FGFR1 amplification | None vs Amplification | 0.532 (0.302-0.937) | 0.029 | 0.301 (0.117-0.774) | 0.013 | 0.830 (0.386-1.783) | 0.633 |
MYC expression | None vs Expression | 0.993 (0.636-1.550) | 0.975 | 0.873 (0.478-1.595) | 0.659 | 1.566 (0.811-3.024) | 0.181 |
- Citation: Kwon D, Yun JY, Keam B, Kim YT, Jeon YK. Prognostic implications of FGFR1 and MYC status in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(44): 9803-9812
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i44/9803.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i44.9803