Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2016; 22(38): 8576-8583
Published online Oct 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i38.8576
Published online Oct 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i38.8576
Variable | n | c-MYC expression | PCNA expression | TIMP1 expression | ||||||
Strong (n = 118) | Low (n = 211) | P value1 | Strong (n = 78) | Low (n = 241) | P value1 | Strong (n = 193) | Low (n = 136) | P value1 | ||
Sex | ||||||||||
Male | 207 | 69 | 136 | 47 | 160 | 119 | 88 | |||
Female | 122 | 49 | 73 | 0.236 | 31 | 81 | 0.324 | 74 | 48 | 0.573 |
Age, median (range) | 62 (21-82) | |||||||||
Histology grade, differentiation | ||||||||||
Well | 10 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 5 | |||
Moderate | 143 | 48 | 95 | 36 | 107 | 57 | 86 | |||
Poor | 176 | 66 | 110 | 0.738 | 40 | 136 | 0.844 | 131 | 45 | < 0.01 |
Pathologic T stage | ||||||||||
T1 | 24 | 9 | 15 | 5 | 19 | 11 | 13 | |||
T2 | 78 | 30 | 48 | 7 | 71 | 41 | 37 | |||
T3 | 74 | 28 | 46 | 15 | 59 | 53 | 21 | |||
T4 | 153 | 51 | 102 | 0.848 | 51 | 102 | < 0.01 | 88 | 65 | 0.045 |
Lymphovascular invasion | ||||||||||
Yes | 153 | 56 | 97 | 37 | 116 | 90 | 63 | |||
No | 176 | 62 | 114 | 0.796 | 41 | 135 | 0.850 | 103 | 73 | 0.956 |
Perineural invasion | ||||||||||
Yes | 127 | 45 | 82 | 32 | 95 | 88 | 39 | |||
No | 202 | 73 | 129 | 0.897 | 46 | 156 | 0.615 | 105 | 97 | < 0.01 |
Chemotherapy | ||||||||||
Yes | 99 | 43 | 56 | 24 | 75 | 58 | 41 | |||
No | 230 | 75 | 155 | 0.060 | 54 | 176 | 0.881 | 135 | 95 | 0.985 |
EMVI | ||||||||||
Positive | 53 | 18 | 35 | 13 | 40 | 32 | 21 | |||
Negative | 276 | 100 | 176 | 0.752 | 65 | 211 | 0.878 | 161 | 115 | 0.782 |
Location | ||||||||||
Below peritoneal reflection | 120 | 41 | 79 | 31 | 89 | 71 | 49 | |||
At peritoneal reflection | 43 | 22 | 21 | 4 | 39 | 25 | 18 | |||
Above peritoneal reflection | 166 | 55 | 111 | 0.080 | 43 | 123 | 0.059 | 97 | 69 | 0.990 |
Variable | HR | 95%CI | P value |
Sex (male vs female) | 1.312 | 0.784-2.159 | 0.354 |
Pathologic T stage (T3-4 vs T1-2) | 1.226 | 0.817-2.657 | 0.012 |
Lymphovascular invasion (yes vs no) | 1.413 | 0.716-1.971 | 0.241 |
Perineural invasion (yes vs no) | 1.539 | 0.992-2.321 | 0.114 |
EMVI (positive vs negative) | 3.071 | 2.784-5.754 | < 0.01 |
c-MYC expression (low vs strong) | 1.138 | 1.003-2.421 | 0.032 |
PCNA expression (strong vs low) | 2.582 | 1.748-4.373 | 0.003 |
TIMP1 expression (low vs strong) | 2.643 | 1.869-5.821 | 0.021 |
IHC panel (2-3 markers high vs 0-1 marker high) | 2.110 | 1.631-2.556 | < 0.01 |
- Citation: Li XF, Jiang Z, Gao Y, Li CX, Shen BZ. Combination of three-gene immunohistochemical panel and magnetic resonance imaging-detected extramural vascular invasion to assess prognosis in non-advanced rectal cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(38): 8576-8583
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i38/8576.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i38.8576