Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2016; 22(36): 8123-8136
Published online Sep 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8123
Published online Sep 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8123
Study type (region) | Sample size | Factors significant on univariate analysis | Factors significant on multivariate analysis, OR (CI) | Factors not significant | |||
Ulcerative Colitis | Crohn’s disease | ||||||
Favours | Protects | Favours | Protects | ||||
Case control[65] (south)1 | 200/200 | Urban residence (birth/current) | Cattle in house compound (current) | Cattle in house compound (current) 0.57 (0.35-0.92) | Age, closed toilet in house, tooth cleanser use, pets in house (childhood/current), Cattle in house compound (childhood), appendicectomy, smoking, regular meat consumption | ||
Treated drinking water (childhood/current) | Regular fish consumption (> 1/wk) | Regular fish consumption (> 1/wk) 0.52 (0.33-0.80) | |||||
Piped water supply in house (childhood/current) | Treated drinking water (childhood/current) 1.59 (1.02-2.47) | ||||||
Lactovegetarian | |||||||
High socioeconomic score | |||||||
Case control[66] (north)1 | 513/188 | Higher education (graduation and beyond) | Using private bed | Using private bed 0.25 (0.16-0.39) | Age, smoking, water source (municipal vs tubewell), illness in family, number of sibs | ||
Hand washing | Owning a pet 2.02 (1.14-3.59) | ||||||
Having personal towel | RCA/flush type latrine | RCA latrine 0.29 (0.14-0.60) | |||||
Owning a pet | Flush type latrine 0.43 (0.23-0.82) | ||||||
Death in family | Death in family 2.19 (1.58-4.07) | ||||||
Case control[67] (east) | 50/50 | Higher intake of refined sugarLow intake of fruits | Higher intake of refined sugar 1.78 (1.03-6.9) | Age, Sex, socioeconomic status, regular smoking and alcohol intake, rice, wheat, meat, fish, fried food, tea/coffee, green leafy vegetables2 | |||
Low intake of fruits 0.28 (0.15-0.65) |
Country | India[9] | South East Asia[81,82] | Australia[81,82] | |||
Factors | UC | CD | UC | CD | UC | CD |
Median Age (yr) | 38.5 | 35.9 | 42 | 34 | 42 | 34 |
Sex (M: F) | 1.4:1 | 1.3:1 | 1.4:1 | 1.6:1 | 1:1.2 | 1:1.1 |
Smokers | 21.3% | 24.2% | 6% | 11% | 8% | 10% |
Disease location | ||||||
L1 | 28.9% | 31% | 31% | |||
L2 | 31.4% | 24% | 24% | |||
L3 | 39.6% | 45% | 45% | |||
L4 | 5.8% | 5% | 5% | |||
Disease behaviour | ||||||
B1 | 76.8% | 66% | 88% | |||
B2 | 18.8% | 17% | 10% | |||
B3 | 4.4% | 19% | 2% | |||
Perianal | 6.9% | 18% | 12% | |||
Disease extent | ||||||
Proctitis | 18.3% | 37% | 32% | |||
Distal colitis | 38.8% | 32% | 27% | |||
Extensive colitis | 42.8% | 31% | 41% | |||
Treatment | ||||||
5ASA | 89.7% | 58.4% | 68% | 49% | 86% | 71% |
Corticosteroids | 29.1% | 26.9% | 21% | 42% | 50% | 67% |
Immunosuppressive | 29.8% | 62.9% | 8% | 35% | 0 | 14% |
Biologics | 0 | 2.2% | 1% | 5% | 0 | 0 |
Antibiotic | 0 | 0 | 25% | 19% | 0 | 21% |
Probiotics | 6.1% | 7.6% | ||||
Surgery | 4.0% | 15.2% | 1.6% | 11.6% | 5.9% | 14.3% |
Positive family history (%) | 2.3% | 4.6% | 31% | 17%1 | ||
EIM | ||||||
Joints | 33.3% | 26.3% | 13%1 | 3.6%1 | ||
Backache | 31.5% | 36.4% | 3.3[AS]1 | |||
Skin | 2.4% | 3.4% | 4.8%1 | 3.6%1 | ||
Incidence per 105 population | 6.07%[8] | 0.76% | 0.54% | 7.33% | 14% |
Study type | Incidence of CRC | Time duration of FU in years | Presented with CRC | CRC developed at FU | Risk of CRC at time in years | Risk Factors | LGD | HGD | Detected on surveillance/symptoms |
Retrospective[91] | 8/436 (1.8%) | 12.1 (7-25) | 4 | 4 (2/4 after 7, 8 yr of FU) | Pancolitis 6/8 (66.7%) | NM | NM | Symptoms | |
Retrospective[90] | 5/532 (0.94%) | 25 | 0 | 5 (in FU of 6 yr) | 0 at 10, 2.3% (4.4% for pancolitis) at 20, 5.8% (10.2% for pancolitis) at > 20 | Pancolitis, disease duration > 10 yr | 2 progressed to CRC (1 after 5 yr, 1 at a different site after 1 yr). 6 did not progress in 1- 2 1/2 yr | 2 (1 CRC after 3 yr, another operated immediately) | 2 CRC on routine surveillance |
Partly Retrospective, partly prospective[1] | 5/50 (10%), [0/21 (prospective), 5/19 (retrospective)] | 9.35 (1-30), prospective 4.5 (1-12), retrospective 15 (8-30) | 0 | 5 (1 after 10 yr, 4 after 20 yr) | 0 at 10, 1% at 20, 7% at > 20 | Disease duration > 10 yr | No surveillance | No surveillance | 5 at symptoms |
Prospective[93] | 12/430 (2.8%) | Median 6 (1-39) | 0 | After median 18 yr from onset (6-27), 3 at 6, 6, 7 yr FU | Incidence density per 103 PYD was 2.3 at 10, 3.3 at 20 , 7 at > 20 | Pancolitis, longer disease duration | NM | NM | 1 on surveillance after 11 yr/11 at symptoms, (unifocal in 10 and multifocal in 2) |
Prospective surveillance study[92] | 1/29 (3.4%) | 10 (7.5-14.5) | 0 | 1 (after 1 yr) | Pancolitis in 55% | 5 at baseline, 3 new cases on surveillance | 3 (1 CRC after 1 yr) | 1 over 42 mo surveillance |
- Citation: Ray G. Inflammatory bowel disease in India - Past, present and future. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(36): 8123-8136
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i36/8123.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8123