Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2016; 22(32): 7301-7310
Published online Aug 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i32.7301
Published online Aug 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i32.7301
Table 1 Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: Clinical cohorts of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy including comparative results
Ref. | Year | Country | Technique | Cases | Operating time, min | EBL, mL | LHS, D | CD≥III | PF | DGE | Readmission rate | Mortality |
Sharp et al[21] | 2015 | United States | LPD | 384 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 5.0% | 5.2% (30 D) |
OPD | 4037 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 9.0% | 3.7% (30 D) | |||
Song et al[16] | 2015 | SouthKorea | LPPPD | 93 | 482.5 ± 117.6 | 609 ± 375 | 14.3 ± 7.8 | 7.5% | 6 (6.5) | 3.2% | 5 (5.4) | NR |
OPPPD | 93 | 347.9 ± 87.2 | 570 ± 448 | 19.2 ± 8.8 | 5.4% | 6 (6.5) | 7.5% | 3 (3.2) | NR | |||
Chen et al[34] | 2015 | China | RPD | 60 | 410 ± 103 | 400 (200-600) | 20 ± 7.4 | 11.7% | 13.3% | 8.3% | NR | 1.7% |
OPD | 120 | 323 ± 80 | 500 (350-800) | 25 ± 11.2 | 13.3% | 24.9% | 15.0% | NR | 2.5% | |||
Dokmak et al[24] | 2015 | France | LPD | 46 | 342 (240-540) | 368 (50-1200) | 25 (6-104) | 28.0% | 48.0% | 17.0% | 9.0% | 2.0% |
OPD | 46 | 264 (120-400) | 293 (50-1200) | 23 (7-115) | 20.0% | 41.0% | 15.0% | 9.0% | 0 | |||
Baker et al[31] | 2015 | United States | RPD | 22 | 454 (294-529) | 425 (50-2200) | 7 (4-25) | 13.6% | 4.6% | 13.6% | 22.7% | 0 |
OPD | 49 | 364 (213-948) | 650 (150-6100) | 9 (5-48) | 20.4% | 12.2% | 30.6% | 29.8% | 4.1% | |||
Tran et al[74] | 2015 | United States | LPD | 681 | NR | NR | 12 (9-20) | NR | NR | NR | NR | 3.8% |
OPD | 14893 | NR | NR | 11 (8-16) | NR | NR | NR | NR | 5.0% | |||
Tan et al[75] | 2015 | China | LPD | 30 | 513.17 ± 56.13 | NR | 9.97 ± 3.74 | NR | 10/30 | 2/30 | NR | 0 |
OPD | 30 | 371.67 ± 85.53 | NR | 11.87 ± 4.72 | NR | 6/30 | 3/30 | NR | 1/30 | |||
Adam et al[32] | 2015 | United States | MIPD | 983 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 4.8% | NR |
OPD | 6078 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 3.7% | NR | |||
Chalikonda et al[33] | 2014 | United States | HPD | 30 | 476.00 | 485 | 9.79 | 30.0% | NR | NR | NR | 4.0% |
OPD | 30 | 366.48 | 775 | 13.26 | 43.0% | NR | NR | NR | 0 | |||
Bao et al[76] | 2014 | United States | RPD | 28 | 431 (340-628) | 100 (50-300) | 7.4 (5.5-17.1) | NR | 29.0% | NR | 25.0% | 7.0% (90 D) |
OPD | 28 | 410 (190-621) | 300 (100-800) | 8.1 (6.5-15.3) | NR | 29.0% | NR | 25.0% | 7.0% (90 D) | |||
Croome et al[20] | 2014 | United States | LPD | 108 | 379.4 ± 93.5 | 492.4 ± 519.3 | 6 (4-118) | 5.6% (≥ IIIb) | 11% (B/C) | 9% (B/C) | NR | 1.0% (I H) |
OPD | 214 | 387.6 ± 91.8 | 866.7 ± 733.7 | 9 (5-73) | 13.6% (≥ IIIb) | 12% (B/C) | 18% (B/C) | NR | 2.0% (I H) | |||
Speicher et al[77] | 2014 | United States | LPD | 25 | 381 (342-465) | 200 (100-425) | 8.5 (7-11.2) | NR | 16% (B/C) | NR | 30.4% | 0 (30 D) |
HPD | 31 | 442 (386.5-486.5) | 600 (312.5-700) | 12 (8.5-18.5) | NR | 35.5% | NR | 35.5% | 3.2%(30 D) | |||
OPD | 84 | 425.5 (345.8-478.8) | 425 (300-700) | 10 (8-14) | NR | 22.6% | NR | 39.3% | 1.2% (30 D) | |||
Asbun et al[11] | 2012 | United States | LPD | 53 | 541 ± 88 | 195 ± 136 | 8.0 ± 3.2 | NR | 16.7% | 11.3% | NR | 5.7% (100 D) |
OPD | 215 | 401 ± 108 | 1032 ± 1151 | 12.4 ± 8.5 | NR | 17.3% | 15.3% | NR | 8.8% (100 D) | |||
Lai et al[28] | 2012 | China | RPD | 20 | 491.5 ± 94.0 | 247 (50-889) | 13.7 ± 6.1 | NR | 35.0% | 5% | NR | 0% |
OPD | 67 | 264.9 ± 63.7 | 774.8 (50-8000) | 25.8 ± 23.1 | NR | 17.9% | 11.9% | NR | 3% |
Table 2 Oncological results of pancreatic cancer in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy: Clinical trials including comparative results of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy
Ref. | Year | Country | Technique | No. of PDAC cases | Rate of R0 resection | No. of LN | Positive LN | Tumor size, cm |
Sharp et al[21] | 2015 | United States | LPD | 384 | 80.0% | 18 ± 9.7 | NR | 3.2 ± 1.3 |
OPD | 4037 | 74.0% | 16 ± 9.6 | NR | 3.3 ± 2.4 | |||
Song et al[16] | 2015 | South Korea | LPPPD | 11 | 72.7% | 15 ± 10 | 0.8 ± 1.2 | 2.8 ± 0.6 |
OPPPD | 261 | 81.0% | 16.2 ± 9.6 | 1.5 ± 2.2 | 3.0 ± 1.2 | |||
Dokmak et al[24] | 2015 | France | LPD | 15 | 60.0% | 20 (8-59) | 4.7 (0-32) | 2.4 (1.5-4) |
OPD | 14 | 50.0% | 25 (8-47) | 2.2 (0-12) | 2.8 (2.5-4) | |||
Chen et al[34] | 2015 | China | RPD | 19 | 94.7% | 18.1 ± 6.6 | NR | 3.0 ± 0.9 |
OPD | 38 | 92.1% | 17.8 ± 7.1 | NR | 3.1 ± 1.0 | |||
Croome et al[20] | 2014 | United States | LPD | 108 | 77.8% | 21.4 ± 8.1 | 73.1% | 3.3 ± 1.0 |
OPD | 214 | 76.6% | 20.1 ± 7.5 | 72.0% | 3.3 ± 1.3 |
- Citation: Zhang YH, Zhang CW, Hu ZM, Hong DF. Pancreatic cancer: Open or minimally invasive surgery? World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(32): 7301-7310
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i32/7301.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i32.7301