Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2016; 22(32): 7301-7310
Published online Aug 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i32.7301
Table 1 Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: Clinical cohorts of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy including comparative results
Ref.YearCountryTechniqueCasesOperating time, minEBL, mLLHS, DCDIIIPFDGEReadmission rateMortality
Sharp et al[21]2015United StatesLPD384NRNRNRNRNRNR5.0%5.2% (30 D)
OPD4037NRNRNRNRNRNR9.0%3.7% (30 D)
Song et al[16]2015SouthKoreaLPPPD93482.5 ± 117.6609 ± 37514.3 ± 7.87.5%6 (6.5)3.2%5 (5.4)NR
OPPPD93347.9 ± 87.2570 ± 44819.2 ± 8.85.4%6 (6.5)7.5%3 (3.2)NR
Chen et al[34]2015ChinaRPD60410 ± 103400 (200-600)20 ± 7.411.7%13.3%8.3%NR1.7%
OPD120323 ± 80500 (350-800)25 ± 11.213.3%24.9%15.0%NR2.5%
Dokmak et al[24]2015FranceLPD46342 (240-540)368 (50-1200)25 (6-104)28.0%48.0%17.0%9.0%2.0%
OPD46264 (120-400)293 (50-1200)23 (7-115)20.0%41.0%15.0%9.0%0
Baker et al[31]2015United StatesRPD22454 (294-529)425 (50-2200)7 (4-25)13.6%4.6%13.6%22.7%0
OPD49364 (213-948)650 (150-6100)9 (5-48)20.4%12.2%30.6%29.8%4.1%
Tran et al[74]2015United StatesLPD681NRNR12 (9-20)NRNRNRNR3.8%
OPD14893NRNR11 (8-16)NRNRNRNR5.0%
Tan et al[75]2015ChinaLPD30513.17 ± 56.13NR9.97 ± 3.74NR10/302/30NR0
OPD30371.67 ± 85.53NR11.87 ± 4.72NR6/303/30NR1/30
Adam et al[32]2015United StatesMIPD983NRNRNRNRNRNR4.8%NR
OPD6078NRNRNRNRNRNR3.7%NR
Chalikonda et al[33]2014United StatesHPD30476.004859.7930.0%NRNRNR4.0%
OPD30366.4877513.2643.0%NRNRNR0
Bao et al[76]2014United StatesRPD28431 (340-628)100 (50-300)7.4 (5.5-17.1)NR29.0%NR25.0%7.0% (90 D)
OPD28410 (190-621)300 (100-800)8.1 (6.5-15.3)NR29.0%NR25.0%7.0% (90 D)
Croome et al[20]2014United StatesLPD108379.4 ± 93.5492.4 ± 519.36 (4-118)5.6% (≥ IIIb)11% (B/C)9% (B/C)NR1.0% (I H)
OPD214387.6 ± 91.8866.7 ± 733.79 (5-73)13.6% (≥ IIIb)12% (B/C)18% (B/C)NR2.0% (I H)
Speicher et al[77]2014United StatesLPD25381 (342-465)200 (100-425)8.5 (7-11.2)NR16% (B/C)NR30.4%0 (30 D)
HPD31442 (386.5-486.5)600 (312.5-700)12 (8.5-18.5)NR35.5%NR35.5%3.2%(30 D)
OPD84425.5 (345.8-478.8)425 (300-700)10 (8-14)NR22.6%NR39.3%1.2% (30 D)
Asbun et al[11]2012United StatesLPD53541 ± 88195 ± 1368.0 ± 3.2NR16.7%11.3%NR5.7% (100 D)
OPD215401 ± 1081032 ± 115112.4 ± 8.5NR17.3%15.3%NR8.8% (100 D)
Lai et al[28]2012ChinaRPD20491.5 ± 94.0247 (50-889)13.7 ± 6.1NR35.0%5%NR0%
OPD67264.9 ± 63.7774.8 (50-8000)25.8 ± 23.1NR17.9%11.9%NR3%
Table 2 Oncological results of pancreatic cancer in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy: Clinical trials including comparative results of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy
Ref.YearCountryTechniqueNo. of PDAC casesRate of R0 resectionNo. of LNPositive LNTumor size, cm
Sharp et al[21]2015United StatesLPD38480.0%18 ± 9.7NR3.2 ± 1.3
OPD403774.0%16 ± 9.6NR3.3 ± 2.4
Song et al[16]2015South KoreaLPPPD1172.7%15 ± 100.8 ± 1.22.8 ± 0.6
OPPPD26181.0%16.2 ± 9.61.5 ± 2.23.0 ± 1.2
Dokmak et al[24]2015FranceLPD1560.0%20 (8-59)4.7 (0-32)2.4 (1.5-4)
OPD1450.0%25 (8-47)2.2 (0-12)2.8 (2.5-4)
Chen et al[34]2015ChinaRPD1994.7%18.1 ± 6.6NR3.0 ± 0.9
OPD3892.1%17.8 ± 7.1NR3.1 ± 1.0
Croome et al[20]2014United StatesLPD10877.8%21.4 ± 8.173.1%3.3 ± 1.0
OPD21476.6%20.1 ± 7.572.0%3.3 ± 1.3