Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2016; 22(1): 435-445
Published online Jan 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i1.435
Published online Jan 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i1.435
Table 1 Systematic literature review of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms n (%)
| Ref. | Year | Lesions/cases | Mean size (mm) | Operation time (min) | En bloc resection | R0 resection | Complications | follow-up (mo) | Local recurrence |
| Linghu et al[5] | 2011 | 11/11 | 48.2 (30-80) | 78.6 (34-120) | 100% | 81.8% | Stenosis: 6 (54.5) | 13.5 (3-30) | 0% |
| Linghu et al[11] | 2013 | ||||||||
| Zhai et al[32] | 2014 | ||||||||
| Gao et al[18] | 2012 | 17/17 | 24 (20-50) | 128 (60-180) | 100% | 82.4% | Delayed bleeding: 1 (5.9) | NA | 0% |
| Xiong et al[19] | 2013 | 7/7 | 35.7 (20-40) | 61 (37-110) | 100% | 100% | Immediate bleeding: 2 (28.6) | 12 | 0% |
| Arantes et al[15] | 2013 | 25/23 | 25 (10-60) | 85 (60-210) | 92% | 84% | SE and ME: 2 (8) | 21.4 (3-36) | 2 (8) |
| Perforation: 1 (4) | |||||||||
| Pioche et al[17] | 2013 | 11/11 | 45 (27-80) | 76 (35-150) | 100% | 81.8% | SE: 9.1% | NA | 1 (9.1) |
| Stenosis: 4 (36.4) | |||||||||
| Tan et al[65] | 2014 | 1/1 | 50 | NA | 100% | 100% | None | 6 | 0% |
| Zhou et al[66] | 2014 | 18/18 | 58 (45-74) | 54.5 (32-85) | 100% | 100% | Immediate bleeding: 1 (5.6) | 6 | 0% |
| SE: 1 (5.6) | |||||||||
| Stenosis: 3 (16.7) | |||||||||
| Total | 90/88 | 37.8 (10-80) | 83.3 (32-180) | 88 (97.8) | 77 (85.6) | Immediate bleeding: 4 (4.4) | NA | 3 (3.3) | |
| Delay bleeding: 1 (1.1) | |||||||||
| Perforation: 1 (1.1) | |||||||||
| SE or ME: 3 (3.3) | |||||||||
| Stenosis: 9 (10) |
- Citation: Zhai YQ, Li HK, Linghu EQ. Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for large superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(1): 435-445
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i1/435.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i1.435