Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2015; 21(5): 1588-1594
Published online Feb 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1588
Table 1 Patient demographics and surgical data n (%)
CharacteristicMedian (range)
Patients21
Age (yr)66 ± 12
Body mass index25 (17-37)
ASA score3 (2-3)
Sex, female/male13/8
Disease status
Benign3 (14.3)
Malignant18 (73)
Parenchymal background (n)
Soft9
Intermediate6
Solid6
Type of procedure
Pylorus-preserving14 (95)
Operative time (min)316 (260-410)
Estimated blood loss (mL)240 (30-1000)
Conversion rate1 (4.9)
Number of lymph nodes retrieved14 (8-26)
Table 2 Final diagnosis and histologic findings
Diagnosisn (%)
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma6
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm2
Ampullary adenocarcinoma8
Cholangiocarcinoma2
Cyst adenoma2
Duodenal adenoma1
Specimen characteristics
Tumor size, median (range) (cm)3 (1.6-5.0)
Margin-negative, R0 resection20 (95)
Regional lymph node metastases5 (24)
Table 3 Surgical outcomes and complications n (%)
Modality5 (24.6)
Pancreatic anastomotic leak1 (4.9)
Delayed gastric emptying2 (9.7)
Postoperative pneumonia1 (4.9)
Surgical site infection1 (4.9)
Table 4 Publications with laparoscopic pancreatioduodenectomy surgical outcomes
Ref.nHA/totalOT (min)EBL (mL)PF n (%)M n (%)HS (d)
Gagner et al[1] 199422/0NANANANANA
Gagner et al[2] 1997102/8510NA2 (20)NANA
Dulucq et al[20] 20062512/13287107NA27NA
Staudacher et al[21] 200544/04163250012
Mabrut et al[22] 200531/2300300NANA7
Lu et al[23] 200650/5528770NA3 (60)NA
Zheng et al[24] 20061NA39050NANA30
Palanivelu et al[17] 2007420/42370653 (7.1)NA10
Cai et al[25] 200810/15108000014
Pugliese et al[3] 2008197/64821803 (23.1)7 (54)18
Sa Cunha et al[26] 200820/25103001 (50)1 (50)19
Gumbs et al[13] 200830/3NANA1 (33)1 (33)NA
Ammori et al[14] 201171/66283501 (14.3)2 (28.6)11
Total12428/7644832511.622 (28.6)16
The current study210/21316280126.714