Huang C, Shen JC, Zhang J, Jiang T, Wu WD, Cao J, Huang KJ, Qiu ZJ. Clinical comparison of laparoscopy vs open surgery in a radical operation for rectal cancer: A retrospective case-control study. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(48): 13532-13541 [PMID: 26730165 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13532]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Zheng-Jun Qiu, MD, Professor, Department of General Surgery, Shanghai First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 100 Haining Road, Shanghai 200080, China. richard-hc@sohu.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2015; 21(48): 13532-13541 Published online Dec 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13532
Table 1 Clinical comparison of radical operation data for rectal cancer
LRR (n = 492)
ORR (n = 424)
P value
Gender
Male
301
243
0.235
Female
191
181
Age (yr, mean ± SD)
64.5 ± 11.9
63.3 ± 12.3
0.290
BMI (kg/m2)
23.274 ± 3.463
23.438 ± 3.533
0.999
Preoperative comorbid diseases
52.8% (260/492)
58.7% (249/424)
0.074
Hypertension
60
57
Coronary heart disease
37
34
Arrhythmia
21
20
COPD
10
13
Pulmonary infection
3
5
Asthma
2
3
Diabetes
42
70
Hepatic cirrhosis
4
3
Cerebral infarction
20
6
Renal failure
17
7
Autoimmune
5
0
Others
39
31
ASA score
0.498
I
109
108
II
321
264
III
62
52
Previous abdominal surgery
75 (15.2%)
65 (15.3%)
0.971
Table 2 Surgery index
LRR (n = 492)
ORR (n = 424)
P value
Surgery duration (min)
143.89 ± 50.865
164.86 ± 67.993
< 0.001
Surgery bleeding (mL)
111.54 ± 97.148
154.03 ± 154.545
< 0.001
Maximum incision (cm)
4.14 ± 0.738
13.8 ± 2.603
< 0.001
Conversions to open
12 (2.4%)
Tumor diameter (cm)
4.338 ± 1.6387
4.325 ± 1.8274
0.914
Sample length(cm)
18.050 ± 5.1748
17.553 ± 5.7995
0.182
Proximal margin (cm)
10.487 ± 4.2906
10.673 ± 5.2175
0.567
Distal margin (cm)
3.214 ± 1.8727
2.873 ± 2.4913
0.022
Lymph nodes retrieved (unit)
11.09 ± 6.503
10.68 ± 6.321
0.338
Table 3 Pathology findings
LRR
ORR
χ2
P value
Differentiation
2.495
0.476
Well-differentiated
88
92
Moderate-differentiation
285
237
Poorly-differentiated
86
72
Mucinous cancer
33
23
pT
7.468
0.058
T1
33
29
T2
164
108
T3
207
193
T4
88
94
pN
6.865
0.076
N0
252
233
N1
147
96
N2
75
73
Nx
18
22
Lymph node metastasis
0.259
Yes
240
191
No
252
233
TNM stage
0.134
I
93
83
II
218
211
III
181
130
Table 4 Perioperative complications for the 2 groups n (%)
LRR (n = 492)
ORR (n = 424)
χ2
P value
Occurrence rate of perioperative complications
19.3% (95/492)
24.1% (102/424)
3.041
0.081
Intraoperative complications
10 (2)
4 (0.9)
1.795
0.180
Massive hemorrhage (> 1000 mL)
2 (0.41)
1 (0.24)
Organ injury
3 (0.61)
2 (0.47)
Equipment disorders
4 (0.81)
0
Other
3 (0.61)
1 (0.24)
Post-operative complications
85 (17.3)
98 (23.31)
4.853
0.028
Anastomotic leakage
24 (4.88)
15 (3.54)
Wound infection
7 (1.42)
27 (6.37)
Ileus
8 (1.63)
9 (2.12)
Anastomotic hemorrhage
3 (0.61)
2 (0.47)
Pelvic abscess
1 (0.20)
1 (0.24)
Abdominal hemorrhage
7 (1.42)
4 (0.94)
Peritonitis/septic shock
9 (1.83)
7 (1.65)
Incisional/port herniation
4 (0.81)
10 (2.36)
Deep vein thrombosis
1 (0.20)
0
Lymphatic fistula
1 (0.20)
0
Pulmonary infection
8 (1.63)
2 (0.47)
Acute cardiac failure
2 (0.41)
10 (2.36)
Urinary infection
4 (0.81)
4 (0.94)
Incision split
4 (0.81)
5 (1.18)
Sudden death
2 (0.41)
2 (0.47)
Table 5 Postoperative recovery
LRR (n = 407)
ORR (n = 326)
P value
Peristalsis recovery (d)
1.91 ± 0.89
2.41 ± 1.13
< 0.001
Exsufflation recovery (d)
3.03 ± 1.25
3.96 ± 1.53
< 0.001
Off-bed (d)
2.80 ± 1.26
3.38 ± 1.07
< 0.017
Liquid intake (d)
3.90 ± 1.446
5.08 ± 1.763
< 0.001
Semi-liquid intake (d)
6.55 ± 1.910
7.59 ± 2.065
< 0.001
Abdominal drainage (d)
9.48 ± 7.386
11.07 ± 10.484
< 0.008
Retention catheterization (d)
5.63 ± 3.613
6.67 ± 4.043
< 0.001
Post-op hospital stay (d)
12.27 ± 3.156
18.32 ± 5.406
< 0.001
Total hospital stay (d)
21.50 ± 4.991
25.81 ± 7.868
< 0.001
Table 6 Postoperative analgesics and pain scores
LRR (n = 492)
ORR (n = 424)
χ2
P value
Analgesic usage
95.31
< 0.001
No
299
121
PCIA
152
273
Short-acting drug
41
30
Post-op pain degree
21.43
< 0.001
Mild
263
193
Medium
213
186
Severe
16
45
Table 7 Economic costs of the operations
LRR (n = 492)
ORR (n = 424)
P value
Operation fee (RMB)
13628 ± 6771
10761 ± 5056
< 0.001
Medication (RMB)
15859 ± 10203
17562 ± 7006
0.06
Total hospitalization (RMB)
40889 ± 19356
42381 ± 17915
0.234
Table 8 Postoperative survival rates
LRR
ORR
P value
Post-op 1-yr
I
99.2%
93.8%
0.402
II
94.7%
92.8%
0.489
III
91.9%
87.8%
0.178
Total survival rate
93.6%
94.0%
0.534
Post-op 3-yr
I
90.3%
91.6%
0.774
II
86.2%
79.1%
0.052
III
70.7%
69.2%
0.777
Total survival rate
80.9%
78.1%
0.284
Post-op 5-yr
I
88.2%
89.2%
0.837
II
81.7%
76.8%
0.140
III
66.9%
65.4%
0.787
Total survival rate
77.0%
75.2%
0.416
Citation: Huang C, Shen JC, Zhang J, Jiang T, Wu WD, Cao J, Huang KJ, Qiu ZJ. Clinical comparison of laparoscopy vs open surgery in a radical operation for rectal cancer: A retrospective case-control study. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(48): 13532-13541