Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2015; 21(47): 13332-13338
Published online Dec 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i47.13332
Published online Dec 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i47.13332
Table 1 Basic information of robotic transvaginal specimen extraction patients
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | Case 6 | Case 7 | Case 8 | Mean | |
Age/yr | 42 | 54 | 49 | 59 | 65 | 69 | 54 | 50 | 55.3 |
BMI | 23.25 | 23.1 | 20.8 | 25.7 | 26 | 21.6 | 22.2 | 23.25 | 23.2 |
Approach | RTG | RTG | RDG | RDG | RDG | RDG | RDG | RDG | |
Reconstruction | Roux-en-Y | Roux-en-Y | Billroth II | Billroth II | Billroth II | Billroth II | Billroth II | Billroth II | |
Number of retrieved LNs | 16/17 | 0/22 | 0/27 | 0/24 | 0/27 | 0/25 | 0/22 | 0/25 | 2/23.6 |
WHO classification | PD | PD | PD | PD | PD | PD | PD | PD | |
Lauren classification | Less curvature Antrum | Less curvature Antrum | Less curvature Body | Less curvature Body | Less curvature Body | Less curvature Body | Less curvature Body | Less curvature Body | |
Histopathology | adenoma | adenoma | adenoma | adenoma | adenoma | adenoma | adenoma | adenoma | |
History | Null | Null | Hemorrhoids 4 yr ago | Appendectomy 10 yr ago | Null | Null | Null | Caesarean section 22 yr ago | |
Postoperative stay/d | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3.6 |
Stage | |||||||||
TNM | T4bN3M0 | T1N0M0 | T1N0M0 | T4bN0M0 | T1N0M0 | T1N0M0 | T1N0M0 | T1N0M0 | |
Gross type | IIIC | IA | IA | IIIB | IA | IA | IA | IA | |
During Operation | |||||||||
Blood loss/mL | 50 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 62.5 |
Blood transfusion/mL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urine/mL | 600 | 400 | 500 | 300 | 300 | 400 | 300 | 450 | 406.3 |
Operation time/min | 225 | 215 | 298 | 200 | 230 | 200 | 185 | 235 | 224 |
Time to first flatus/h | 30 | 32 | 27 | 33 | 36 | 35 | 28 | 33 | 31.8 |
Table 2 Clinical features of robotic transvaginal specimen extraction patients
Adverse event | Pain/ VAS | activity/ step | Sleep/h | |||||||||
Anastomotic leakage | 30 d re-admission | SSI or LI | POD 1 | POD 2 | POD 3 | POD 1 | POD 2 | POD 3 | POD 1 | POD 2 | POD 3 | |
TVSE-RTG | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 55 | 342 | 1100 | 7 | 6 | 6.5 |
TVSE-RDG | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 1 | 62 | 336 | 1078 | 7.1 | 6.8 | 7.9 |
Table 3 SpO2 fluctuation during the perioperative course
SpO2/% | HR/min | Hand grip strength/(left/right) kg | ||||||
Pre- | POD 1 | POD 3 | Pre- | POD 1 | POD 3 | Admission | Discharge | |
TVSE-RTG | 100 | 98.5 | 99 | 60 | 62 | 60 | 25.6/25 | 27.8/26.3 |
TVSE-RDG | 100 | 98.3 | 99.3 | 66.2 | 77.5 | 72.5 | 23.3/21.7 | 25.6/24.5 |
Table 4 Laboratory features of robotic transvaginal specimen extraction patients
CRP (mg/L) | HB (g/L) | ALB (g/L) | PAB (g/L) | TFN (g/L) | |||||||||||
Pre- | POD 1 | POD 3 | Pre- | POD 1 | POD 3 | Pre- | POD 1 | POD 3 | Pre- | POD 1 | POD 3 | Pre- | POD 1 | POD 3 | |
TVSE-RTG | 0.4 | 1.8 | 32.2 | 132 | 131 | 123 | 41.6 | 34.8 | 28.4 | 321 | 227 | 200 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.2 |
TVSE-RDG | 0.5 | 19.4 | 35 | 133 | 124 | 116.3 | 41.4 | 33.5 | 29.6 | 273.7 | 236.8 | 205.8 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.3 |
- Citation: Zhang S, Jiang ZW, Wang G, Feng XB, Liu J, Zhao J, Li JS. Robotic gastrectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction for female gastric cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(47): 13332-13338
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i47/13332.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i47.13332