Case Control Study
Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2015; 21(46): 13064-13072
Published online Dec 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i46.13064
Table 1 Used primer and restriction enzyme at each polymorphism
Polymorphisms Forward primer Reverse primer Restriction enzyme1 -238 G>A 5’-AGA AGA CCC CCC TCG GAA CC2 -3’ 5’-ATC TGG AGG AAG CGG TAG TG-3' Msp I-308 G>A 5’-AGG CAA TAG GTT TTG AGG GCC AT-3' 5’-TCC TCC CTG CTC CGA TTC CG-3' Nco I-857 C>T 5′-AAG TCG AGT ATG GGG ACC CCC CGT TAA-3' 5′-CCC CAG TGT GTG GCC ATA TCT TCT T-3' Ase I-863 C>A 5'-GGC TCT GAG GAA TGG GTT 5'-CTA CAT GGC CCT GTC TTC GTT ACG-3' Mnl I-1031 T>C 5’-AGC AAG AGC TGT GGG GAG AA-3' 5’-CCT GTA ACC CAT TCC TCA GAG CC-3' Bbs I
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of study sample n (%)
Variable Cases Controls P value1 n 157 201 Age (yr, mean ± SD) 56.00 ± 11.06 54.00 ± 11.22 0.061 Sex (male, %) 120 (76.4) 148 (73.6) 0.871 Hypertension 19 (12.1) 50 (24.9) 0.012 Diabetes mellitus 30 (19.1) 26 (12.9) 0.195 BMI > 25 kg/m2 40 (25.5) 51 (24.9) 1.000 Smoking 84 (53.5) 78 (38.8) 0.106 Drinking 90 (57.3) 93 (46.3) 0.274 Tumor size < 5 cm 68 (43.3) - - ≥ 5 cm 89 (56.7) - - Portal vein thrombosis No 92 (58.6) - - Yes 65 (41.4) - - Surgical resection No 145 (92.4) - - Yes 12 (7.6) - - CTx/RTx No 27 (17.2) - - Yes 130 (82.8) - - TNM stage I 34 (21.7) - - II 37 (23.5) - - III 51 (32.5) - - IV 35 (22.3) - - Okuda stage I 46 (29.3) - - II 68 (43.3) - - III 43 (27.4) - - CTP class A 83 (52.9) - - B 36 (22.9) - - C 38 (24.2) - -
Table 3 Genotype frequencies and hepatocellular carcinoma adjusted odd ratios for the TNF- α -1031 T>C, -863 C>A, -857 C>T, -308 G>A, and -238 G>A polymorphisms in hepatocellular carcinoma cases and controls n (%)
Characteristics Controls, n = 201 HCC cases HCC cases with HBV Cases, n = 157 AOR (95%CI)1 P- value FDR-P- value Cases, n = 125 AOR (95%CI)1 P- value FDR-P- value TNF -α -1031 T>C, rs1799964TT 121 (60.2) 99 (63.1) 1.000 (reference) 73 (58.4) 1.000 (reference) TC 70 (34.8) 47 (29.9) 0.796 (0.487-1.301) 0.362 0.586 42 (33.6) 0.922 (0.550-1.544) 0.756 0.960 CC 10 (5.0) 11 (7.0) 1.308 (0.498-3.436) 0.586 0.586 10 (8.0) 1.724 (0.628-4.729) 0.290 0.580 Dominant (TT vs TC + CC) 0.860 (0.540-1.369) 0.524 0.586 1.013 (0.622-1.650) 0.960 0.960 Recessive (TT + TC vs CC) 1.393 (0.540-3.595) 0.493 0.586 1.745 (0.649-4.693) 0.270 0.580 HWE-P 0.976 0.112 0.268 TNF- α -863 C>A, rs1800630CC 129 (64.2) 98 (62.4) 1.000 (reference) 74 (59.2) 1.000 (reference) CA 62 (30.8) 53 (33.8) 1.154 (0.709-1.878) 0.565 0.672 46 (36.8) 1.284 (0.767-2.150) 0.341 0.750 AA 10 (5.0) 6 (3.8) 0.784 (0.255-2.414) 0.672 0.672 5 (4.0) 0.825 (0.253-2.690) 0.750 0.750 Dominant (CC vs CA + AA) 1.109 (0.695-1.768) 0.666 0.672 1.226 (0.749-2.007) 0.418 0.750 Recessive (CC + CA vs AA) 0.734 (0.243-2.222) 0.584 0.672 0.760 (0.238-2.428) 0.643 0.750 HWE-P 0.477 0.723 0.513 TNF- α -857 C>T, rs1799724CC 142 (70.6) 116 (73.9) 1.000 (reference) 92 (73.6) 1.000 (reference) CT 53 (26.4) 35 (22.3) 0.841 (0.493-1.432) 0.523 0.697 29 (23.2) 0.840 (0.477- 1.478) 0.545 0.893 TT 6 (3.0) 6 (3.8) 1.816 (0.428-7.714) 0.419 0.697 4 (3.2) 1.110 (0.226- 5.438) 0.898 0.893 Dominant (CC vs CT + TT) 0.930 (0.558-1.548) 0.780 0.78 0.888 (0.516-1.531) 0.670 0.893 Recessive (CC + CT vs TT) 2.091 (0.494-8.860) 0.317 0.697 1.500 (0.312-7.203) 0.612 0.893 HWE-P 0.698 0.120 0.371 TNF- α -308 G>A, rs1800629GG 181 (90.0) 133 (84.7) 1.000 (reference) 108 (86.4) 1.000 (reference) GA 18 (9.0) 23 (14.6) 1.949 (0.940- 4.040) 0.073 0.178 17 (13.6) 1.779 (0.821-3.853) 0.144 0.430 AA 2 (1.0) 1 (0.6) 0.936 (0.075-11.646) 0.959 0.959 0 (0.0) N/A 0.995 0.995 Dominant (GG vs GA + AA) 1.841 (0.911-3.720) 0.089 0.178 1.610 (0.758-3.419) 0.215 0.430 Recessive (GG + GA vs AA) 0.861 (0.069-10.734) 0.908 0.959 N/A 0.995 0.995 HWE-P 0.057 0.996 0.415 TNF- α -238 G>A, rs 361525GG 180 (89.6) 130 (82.8) 1.000 (reference) 104 (83.2) 1.000 (reference) GA 20 (10.0) 26 (17.6) 1.634 (0.821-3.251) 0.162 0.324 20 (16.0) 1.491 (0.713-3.117) 0.288 0.576 AA 1 (0.5) 1 (0.6) N/A 0.993 0.994 1 (0.8) N/A 0.993 0.993 Dominant (GG vs GA + AA) 1.732 (0.876-3.424) 0.115 0.324 1.614 (0.780-3.340) 0.197 0.576 Recessive (GG + GA vs AA) N/A 0.994 0.994 N/A 0.993 0.993 HWE-P 0.587 0.807 0.972
Table 4 TNF- α genotype combinations in hepatocellular carcinoma cases and controls1 n (%)
Genotype HCC cases, n = 157 Controls, n = 201 AOR (95%CI)2 P- value TNF- α -1031/-857/-238TT/CC/GG 56 (35.7) 81 (40.3) 1.000 (reference) TT/CC/GA 11 (7.0) 2 (1.0) 18.849 (2.203-161.246) 0.007 TNF- α -1031/-308/-238TT/GG/GG 68 (43.3) 103 (51.2) 1.000 (reference) TT/GG/GA 13 (8.3) 2 (1.0) 26.956 (3.071-236.584) 0.003 TT/GA/GG 17 (10.8) 14 (7.0) 2.712 (1.085-6.778) 0.033 TNF- α -863/-308/-238CC/GG/GG 68 (43.3) 99 (49.3) 1.000 (reference) CC/GA/GG 16 (10.2) 13 (6.5) 2.533 (1.007-6.371) 0.048 CA/GG/GA 13 (8.3) 5 (2.5) 4.242 (1.243-14.473) 0.021 TNF- α -1031/-238TT/GG 86 (54.8) 119 (59.2) 1.000 (reference) TT/GA 13 (8.3) 2 (1.0) 21.576 (2.581-180.394) 0.005 TNF- α -863/-238CC/GG 85 (54.1) 114 (56.7) 1.000 (reference) CA/GA 13 (8.3) 5 (2.5) 3.669 (1.098-12.253) 0.035 TNF- α -308/-238GG/GG 107 (68.2) 160 (79.6) 1.000 (reference) GA/GG 23 (14.6) 18 (9.0) 2.283 (1.078-4.836) 0.031 GA+AA/GG 24 (15.3) 20 (10.0) 2.150 (1.041-4.441) 0.039
Table 5 TNF- α -1031 T>C, -863 C>A, -857 C>T, -308 G>A, and -238 G>A haplotypes in hepatocellular carcinoma cases and controls1
Haplotype Overall Control Case OR (95%CI) P- value TNF- α -1031/-863/-857/-308/-238T-C-C-G-G 0.5266 0.5399 0.5139 1.000 (reference) T-C-C-G-A 0.0119 0.0000 0.0289 25.824 (1.491-447.223) 0.0005 T-C-C-A-G 0.0582 0.0486 0.0647 1.428 (0.749-2.723) 0.320 T-C-T-G-G 0.1334 0.1435 0.1232 0.891 (0.564-1.407) 0.645 T-C-T-A-G 0.0056 0.0040 0.0072 1.360 (0.190-9.764) 1.000 T-A-C-G-G 0.0171 0.0210 0.0000 0.080 (0.005-1.396) 0.023 T-A-C-G-A 0.0109 0.0025 0.0226 4.761 (0.976-23.230) 0.043 T-A-C-A-G 0.0010 0.0000 0.0066 6.796 (0.324-142.621) 0.181 T-A-T-G-G 0.0123 0.0121 0.0133 1.088 (0.288-4.118) 1.000 T-A-T-A-G 0.0009 0.0022 0.0000 0.453 (0.018-11.201) 1.000 C-C-C-G-G 0.0133 0.0103 0.0162 2.176 (0.699-6.778) 0.254 C-C-C-G-A 0.0414 0.0498 0.0318 0.605 (0.257-1.425) 0.306 C-C-T-G-A 0.0042 0.0009 0.0066 6.796 (0.324-142.600) 0.181 C-A-C-G-G 0.1631 0.1638 0.1646 1.088 (0.717-1.652) 0.749 TNF- α -1031/-857/-308/-238T-C-G-G 0.5430 0.5637 0.5105 1.000 (reference) T-C-G-A 0.0235 0.0060 0.0531 12.059 (2.747-52.950) < 0.0001 TNF- α -1031/-857/-238T-C-G 0.6026 0.6128 0.5854 1.000 (reference) T-C-A 0.0231 0.0060 0.0517 10.696 (2.428-47.110) 0.0001 TNF- α -1031/-308/-238T-G-G 0.6885 0.7187 0.6488 1.000 (reference) T-G-A 0.0238 0.0063 0.0518 7.556 (2.173-26.280) 0.0002 TNF- α -1031/-238T-G 0.7546 0.7738 0.7297 1.000 (reference) T-A 0.0233 0.0062 0.0505 10.865 (2.473- 47.740) 0.0001
Table 6 Results of stepwise Cox regression analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma survival
Covariate β SEM HR (95%CI) P valueSex -1.318 0.480 0.268 (0.105-0.682) 0.006 Chemotherapy or radiotherapy -1.914 0.500 0.148 (0.056-0.391) 0.0001 Portal vein thrombosis 1.334 0.478 3.795 (1.495-9.631) 0.005 TNF- α -1031 TT vs CC1.772 0.733 5.881 (1.408-24.554) 0.016
Table 7 TNF- α genotypes and survival in Okuda stage III hepatocellular carcinoma cases
Genotype Validation set Adjusted HR (95%CI)1 P- value Cases (n = 43) Deaths (n = 41) TNF- α -1031 T>C, rs1799964TT 29 (67.4) 27 (65.9) 1.000 (reference) TC 11 (25.6) 11 (26.8) 1.314 (0.448-3.856) 0.621 CC 3 (7.0) 3 (7.3) 5.795 (1.145-29.323) 0.035 Dorminant model (TT vs TC + CC) 1.805 (0.733-4.442) 0.201 Recessive model (TT + TC vs CC) 3.761 (0.869-16.265) 0.078