Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2015; 21(40): 11246-11259
Published online Oct 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11246
Published online Oct 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11246
Table 1 Endoscopic score correlation with C-reactive protein
Table 2 C-reactive protein values and correlating endoscopic scores
Ref. | Disease | Endoscopic tool | Endoscopic score (descriptor) | Calculation | CRP scores |
Falvey et al[71] | CD | SES-CD | 0-2 (inactive) | Mean (95%CI) | 2.9 mg/L (1.8-4.6) |
3-6 (mild) | 4.0 mg/L (2.6-6.1) | ||||
7-15 (moderate) | 5.1 mg/L (3.0-9.0) | ||||
> 16 (severe) | 22 mg/L (12.5-38.9) | ||||
Sipponen et al[88] | CD | CDEIS | < 3 (inactive) | Median (95%CI) | 0.0 mg/L (0-21) |
3-9 (mild) | 0.0 mg/L (0-26) | ||||
9-12 (moderate) | 8.5 mg/L (0-85) | ||||
≥ 12 (severe) | 16.5 mg/L (0-211) | ||||
Schoepfer et al[77] | CD | SES-CD | 0-3 (inactive) | Mean (range) | 12 mg/L (3-94) |
4-10 (mild) | 8 mg/L (3-53) | ||||
11-19 (moderate) | 23 mg/L (3-172) | ||||
≥ 20 (high) | 40 mg/L (5-121) |
Table 3 Endoscopic score correlation with fecal calprotectin
Ref. | Disease | Endoscopic tool | Correlation | P value |
af Björkesten et al[25] | CD | SES-CD | r = 0.560 | < 0.001 |
Sipponen et al[88] | CD | CDEIS | r = 0.831 | < 0.001 |
Sipponen et al[49] | CD | SES-CD | r = 0.642 | < 0.001 |
Sipponen et al[62] | CD | CDEIS | r = 0.729 | < 0.001 |
Schoepfer et al[77] | CD | SES-CD | r = 0.530 | < 0.010 |
Lobatón et al[74] | CD | CDEIS | r = 0.7221 | < 0.001 |
r = 0.7692 | < 0.001 | |||
Lobatón et al[48] | UC | Mayo | r = 0.7411 | < 0.001 |
r = 0.7272 | < 0.001 | |||
Takashima et al[67] | UC | Mayo | r = 0.580 | < 0.0001 |
Røseth et al[66] | UC | Mayo | r = 0.570 | < 0.0001 |
D’Haens et al[64] | UC | Mayo | r = 0.623 | < 0.001 |
CD | CDEIS | r = 0.419 | < 0.001 | |
CD | SES-CD | r = 0.490 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Fecal calprotectin values and correlating endoscopic scores
Ref. | Disease | Endoscopic tool | Endoscopic score (descriptor) | Calculation | Calprotectin scores |
Falvey et al[71] | CD | SES-CD | 0-2 (inactive) | mean (95%CI) | 55 μg/g (25-123) |
3-6 (mild) | 167 μg/g (97-288) | ||||
7-15 (moderate) | 366 μg/g (192-698) | ||||
16+ (severe) | 732 μg/g (338-1587) | ||||
Sipponen et al[49] | CD | SES-CD | ≤ 3 (inactive-mild) | Median (range) | 37 μg/g (13-166) |
> 3 (active) | 686 μg/g (18-15326) | ||||
Sipponen et al[62] | CD | CDEIS | < 3 (inactive) | Median (range) | 63 μg/g (11-869) |
3-9 (mild) | 170 μg/g (17-2440) | ||||
9-12 (moderate) | 1014 μg/g (123-2284) | ||||
> 12 (severe) | 2066 μg/g (323-18575) | ||||
Schoepfer et al[77] | CD | SES-CD | 0-3 (inactive) | mean (range) | 104 μg/g (10-725) |
4-10 (mild) | 231 μg/g (12-1009) | ||||
11-19 (moderate) | 395 μg/g (68-912) | ||||
≥ 20 (high) | 718 μg/g (93-1327) | ||||
Lobatón et al[48] | CD | CDEIS | < 3 (endoscopic remission) | Median (range) | 101.8 μg/g (30-1620.9) |
≥ 3 (endoscopic activity) | 1211.9 μg/g (122-1800) |
Table 5 Calprotectin cutoffs for predicting clinical relapse
Ref. | Disease | FC value | Relative risk | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
García-Sánchez et al[107] | UC | > 120 μg/g | 6 | 80 | 60 |
CD | > 200 μg/g | 4 | |||
Tibble et al[108] | UC/CD | > 50 μg/g | 13 | 90 | 83 |
Kallel et al[109] | CD | > 340 μg/g | 18 | 80 | 90.7 |
Naismith et al[82] | CD | ≥ 240 μg/g | 12.18 | 80 | 74.4 |
Costa et al[110] | UC | > 150 μg/g | 14 | 89 | 92 |
CD | > 150 μg/g | 2 | 87 | 43 | |
D’Inca et al[103] | UC/CD | > 130 mg/kg | - | 68 | 67 |
Table 6 Calculated fecal calprotectin cutoffs based on endoscopic score
Ref. | Disease | Endoscopic tool | Score | FC cutoff | Sensitivity(%) | Specificity(%) | PPV(%) | NPV(%) |
Guidi et al[111] | UC/CD | CDEIS | < 3 (mucosal healing) | 121 μg/ga | 79 | 57 | - | - |
D’Haens et al[64] | CD | CDEIS | < 3 (inactive) | 250 μg/g | 94.1 | 62.2 | 48.5 | 96.6 |
UC | Mayo | 1-3 (any inflammation) | 250 μg/g | 71 | 100 | 100 | 47.1 | |
Sipponen et al[88] | CD | CDEIS | ≥ 3 (active) | 200 μg/g | 87 | 100 | 100 | 70 |
af Björkesten et al[25] | CD | SES-CD | 0 (inactive) | 94 μg/g | 82 | 78 | - | - |
Lobatón et al[48] | UC | Mayo | 0-1 (inactive-mild)1 | 250 μg/g1b | 73.5 | 89.7 | 86.2 | 79.5 |
0-1 (inactive-mild)2 | 280 μg/g2b | 75.4 | 89.1 | 86 | 80.3 | |||
Takashima et al[67] | UC | Mayo | 0 (inactive) | 250 μg/g | 82 | 62 | 61 | 83 |
Table 7 Predicting postoperative recurrence with fecal calprotectin
Ref. | Type of recurrence | Follow-up time | FC value | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
Lasson et al[98] | Endoscopic | 1 yr | 100 μg/g | 85 | 35 | 50 | 75 |
200 μg/g | 54 | 53 | 47 | 60 | |||
250 μg/g | 46 | 53 | 43 | 56 | |||
Wright et al[96] | Endoscopic | 6 mo | 135 μg/g | 91 | 62 | 55 | 93 |
18 mo | 127 μg/g | 88 | 67 | 58 | 91 | ||
Orlando et al[94] | Endoscopic | 1 yr | 200 mg/L | 63 | 75 | ||
Yamamoto et al[51] | Endoscopic | 1 yr | 140 μg/g | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 |
Clinical | 170 μg/g | 83 | 93 | 83 | 93 | ||
Lobatón et al[74] | Endoscopic | Not specified | 203 μg/g1 | 75 | 72 | - | - |
283 μg/g2 | 67 | 72 | |||||
Boschetti et al[44] | Endoscopic | Within 18 mo | 100 μg/g | 95 | 54 | 93 | 77 |
- Citation: Chang S, Malter L, Hudesman D. Disease monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(40): 11246-11259
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i40/11246.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11246