Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2015; 21(38): 10709-10713
Published online Oct 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i38.10709
Published online Oct 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i38.10709
Ref. | Primary endpoint | Treatment arms | No. of patients | OS (mo) |
Moore et al[31] | OS | Gemcitabine + erlotinib | 569 | 6.24 vs 5.91 |
HR = 0.82 | ||||
vs gemcitabine | CI: 0.69-0.99 | |||
P = 0.038 | ||||
Cunningham et al[22] | OS | Gemcitabine + | 533 | 7.1 vs 6.2 |
capecitabine | HR = 0.86 | |||
vs gemcitabine | CI: 0.72-1.02 | |||
P = 0.08 | ||||
Meta-analysis | ||||
935 | OS NA | |||
HR = 0.86 | ||||
CI: 0.75-0.98 | ||||
P = 0.02 | ||||
Conroy et al[23] | OS | FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine | 342 | 11.1 vs 6.8 |
HR = 0.57 | ||||
CI: 0.45-0.73 | ||||
P < 0.0001 | ||||
Von Hoff et al[25] | OS | Nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine vs gemcitabine + placebo | 861 | 8.5 vs 6.7 |
HR = 0.77 | ||||
CI: 0.62-0.83 | ||||
P < 0.0001 |
- Citation: Korkeila EA. Advanced pancreatic cancer - how to choose an adequate treatment option. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(38): 10709-10713
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i38/10709.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i38.10709