Zhu SL, Zhong JH, Ke Y, Ma L, You XM, Li LQ. Efficacy of hepatic resection vs transarterial chemoembolization for solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(32): 9630-9637 [PMID: 26327771 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9630]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Le-Qun Li, PhD, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, He Di Rd. No. 71, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. xitongpingjia@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2015; 21(32): 9630-9637 Published online Aug 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9630
Table 1 Clinicopathologic features of all study participants with solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma (≥ 10 cm) receiving hepatic resection or transarterial chemoembolization n (%)
Variable
HR (n = 180)
TACE (n = 67)
Standardized difference, %
P-value
Age, yr
46.3 ± 11.9
48.1 ± 12.4
14.2
0.307
M/F
158 (87.8)/22 (12.2)
64 (95.5)/3 (4.5)
37.2
0.073
Tumor size, cm
11.3 ± 2.2
11.9 ± 2.2
26.7
0.059
HBsAg (+)
153 (85)
65 (97.0)
70.1
0.009
Child-Pugh class
A
175
64
8.2
0.790
B
5
3
Cirrhosis
133 (73.9)
57 (85.1)
31.2
0.064
AFP
≥ 400 ng/mL
75 (41.7)
37 (55.2)
27.1
0.057
≤ 400 ng/mL
105 (58.3)
30 (44.8)
Total bilirubin, μmol/L
13.4 ± 5.9
16.1 ± 8.4
37.6
0.004
ALT, U/L
50.7 ± 52.4
63.6 ± 44.5
29.1
0.074
AST, U/L
60.6 ± 40.9
56.0 ± 35.4
13.0
0.418
Prothrombin time, s
12.8 ± 1.4
13.1 ± 2.3
9.7
0.355
Albumin, g/L
39.4 ± 4.6
37.5 ± 6.5
29.0
0.012
Platelet count, 109/L
210.0 ± 77.6
213.4 ± 89.4
3.8
0.771
Vascular invasion
26 (14.4)
6 (9.0)
19.1
0.253
Table 2 Clinicopathologic features of propensity score-matched study participants with solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma (≥ 10 cm) receiving hepatic resection or transarterial chemoembolization n (%)
Variables
HR (n = 61)
TACE (n = 61)
Standardized difference, %
P-value
Age (yr)
46.3 ± 11.9
48.1 ± 12.4
4.3
0.808
Gender (M/F), n (%)
58 (95.1)/3 (4.9)
58 (95.1)/3 (4.9)
0
1.000
Tumor size (cm)
11.9 ± 3.0
11.8 ± 2.3
2.3
0.915
HBsAg (+)
60 (98.4)
60 (98.4)
0
1.000
Child-Pugh class
A
58
58
0
1.000
B
3
3
Cirrhosis
52 (85.2)
51 (83.6)
4.4
0.803
AFP (ng/mL)
≥ 400
31 (50.8)
32 (52.5)
3.3
0.856
≤ 400
30 (49.2)
29 (47.5)
Total bilirubin (μmol/L)
13.6 ± 6.8
15.1 ± 8.1
8.9
0.261
ALT (U/L)
59.0 ± 56.5
60.2 ± 42.6
3.0
0.888
AST (U/L)
57.6 ± 30.3
57.4 ± 36.3
0.4
0.983
Prothrombin time (s)
12.7 ± 1.4
13.0 ± 2.3
9.7
0.504
Albumin (g/L)
37.7 ± 4.6
37.7 ± 6.6
0.5
0.972
Platelet count (109/L)
218.1 ± 86.9
213.0 ± 88.6
3.8
0.750
Vascular invasion
5 (8.2)
6 (9.8)
5.5
0.752
Table 3 Treatment outcomes in patients with solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma receiving hepatic resection or transarterial chemoembolization, before and after propensity score matching n (%)
Before matching
After matching
HR (n = 180)
TACE (n = 67)
P-value
HR (n = 61)
TACE (n = 61)
P-value
30-d mortality
2 (1.1)
1 (1.5)
1.000
1 (1.6)
1 (1.6)
1.000
90-d mortality
6 (3.3)
2 (3.0)
1.000
3 (4.9)
2 (3.3)
1.000
Postoperative complications
36 (20.0)
11 (16.4)
0.524
14 (23.0)
10 (16.4)
0.362
Liver failure
5 (2.8)
5 (7.5)
0.194
4 (6.6)
4 (6.6)
1.000
Bleeding
4 (2.2)
0 (0)
0.507
1 (1.6)
0 (0)
1.000
Wound infection
5 (2.8)
0 (0)
0.384
2 (3.3)
0 (0)
0.476
Puncture hematoma
0 (0)
3 (4.5)
0.019
0 (0)
3 (4.9)
0.242
Bile fistula
2 (1.1)
0 (0)
1.000
0 (0)
0 (0)
1.000
Pulmonary infection
6 (3.3)
3 (4.5)
0.964
2 (3.3)
3 (4.9)
1.000
Incision dehiscence
2 (1.1)
0 (0)
1.000
0 (0)
0 (0)
1.000
Abdominal infection
3 (1.7)
0 (0)
0.565
1 (1.6)
0 (0)
1.000
Hydrothorax
7 (3.9)
0 (0)
0.228
4 (6.6)
0 (0)
0.127
Intestinal obstruction
2 (1.1)
0 (0)
1.000
0 (0)
0 (0)
1.000
Table 4 Prognostic factors predicting overall survival in propensity score-matched patients with solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatic resection or transarterial chemoembolization
Variable
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR
95%CI
P-value
HR
95%CI
P-value
Age (yr)
0.988
0.970-1.007
0.220
Gender (M/F)
1.459
0.357-5.962
0.599
Tumor size (cm)
1.054
0.973-1.141
0.197
HBsAg (+/-)
1.391
0.340-5.685
0.646
Child-Pugh class (A/B)
0.919
0.289-2.921
0.887
Cirrhosis (present/absent)
1.207
0.621-1.611
0.579
AFP (≥ 400/< 400 ng/mL)
1.721
1.097-2.347
0.018
1.997
1.259-3.166
0.003
Total bilirubin (μmol/L)
1.025
0.994-1.057
0.116
ALT (U/L)
1.004
1.000-1.009
0.052
AST (U/L)
1.003
0.997-1.008
0.322
Prothrombin time (s)
1.052
0.922-1.201
0.453
Albumin (g/L)
1.010
0.969-1.053
0.653
Platelet count (109/L)
0.998
0.995-1.001
0.190
Vascular invasion (present/absent)
2.335
1.057-5.159
0.036
2.347
1.051-5.242
0.037
Treatment modality (TACE/hepatic resection)
2.343
1.468-3.741
< 0.001
2.492
1.550-4.006
< 0.001
Citation: Zhu SL, Zhong JH, Ke Y, Ma L, You XM, Li LQ. Efficacy of hepatic resection vs transarterial chemoembolization for solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(32): 9630-9637