Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2015; 21(32): 9614-9622
Published online Aug 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9614
Published online Aug 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9614
Table 1 Patient baseline demographics and the treatment n (%)
Variable | Derivation cohort | Validation cohort | P value |
(n = 113) | (n = 68) | ||
Age (yr) | 44.6 (22-81) | 46.1 (20-79) | 0.529 |
Men | 94 (83) | 52 (76) | 0.268 |
Etiology of liver failure | |||
HBV | 64 (56.6) | 40 (59) | 0.773 |
HBV + HEV | 36 (31.9) | 18 (26) | 0.443 |
Other causes1 | 13 (11.5) | 10 (15) | 0.531 |
MELD score | 24 (12-44) | 26 (13-46) | 0.659 |
Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 24.8 (5.9-51.8) | 23.1 (5.7-50.1) | 0.841 |
ALT (IU/mL) | 262 (12-1757) | 211 (23-1519) | 0.169 |
AST (IU/mL) | 232 (17-1634) | 206 (20-1301) | 0.326 |
Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.9 (0.3-6.8) | 1.0 (0.3-7.1) | 0.533 |
INR | 2.4 (0.8-11.4) | 2.6 (1.0-16.1) | 0.285 |
Cirrhosis | 58 (51.3) | 45 (66.2) | 0.051 |
Number of complications | |||
1 | 57 (50.4) | 39 (57.4) | 0.367 |
2 | 27 (23.9) | 13 (19.1) | 0.453 |
3 | 20 (17.7) | 10 (14.7) | 0.600 |
4 | 8 (7.1) | 4 (5.9) | 0.996 |
5 | 1 (0.9) | 2 (2.9) | 0.654 |
Type of ALSS | |||
PE | 54 (47.8) | 33 (48.5) | 0.923 |
PE + PBA | 59 (52.2) | 35 (51.5) | 0.923 |
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for survival
Variable | Univariate | Multivariate | |||
HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | Coefficient | |
Age | 1.045 (1.024-1.067) | < 0.001 | 1.031 (1.008-1.054) | 0.008 | 0.030 |
Gender1 | 0.704 (0.296-1.676) | 0.428 | |||
Etiology2 | 0.736 (0.178-3.049) | 0.673 | |||
MELD score | 1.120 (1.080-1.161) | < 0.001 | 1.102 (1.056-1.150) | < 0.001 | 0.097 |
Total bilirubin | 1.002 (1.000-1.003) | 0.047 | |||
ALT | 1.001 (1.000-1.002) | 0.022 | |||
AST | 1.001 (1.000-1.002) | 0.011 | |||
Creatinine | 1.003 (1.000-1.005) | 0.055 | |||
BUN | 1.083 (1.015-1.157) | 0.017 | |||
INR | 1.369 (1.209-1.550) | < 0.001 | |||
Times3 | 0.753 (0.549-1.034) | 0.080 | |||
Complication4 | 2.246 (1.721-2.933) | < 0.001 | 1.694 (1.224-2.344) | 0.001 | 0.527 |
ALSS5 | 0.455 (0.242-0.856) | 0.015 | 0.454 (0.232-0.889) | 0.021 | -0.790 |
Table 3 Calculation of probability of survival according to the risk score
Days | 30 | 60 | 90 | 120 | 180 | 270 |
S0 (t) | 92.50% | 84.90% | 79.70% | 77.40% | 71.80% | 65.60% |
Table 4 Prognosis in the derivation and validation cohorts according to risk score n (%)
Prognosis | Derivation cohort | Validation cohort | P value |
(n = 113) | (n = 68) | ||
Good | 36 (31.9) | 21 (30.9) | 0.891 |
Fair | 55 (48.7) | 32 (47.1) | 0.833 |
Poor | 22 (19.4) | 15 (22.0) | 0.676 |
- Citation: Zhou PQ, Zheng SP, Yu M, He SS, Weng ZH. Prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients treated with artificial liver support system. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(32): 9614-9622
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i32/9614.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9614