Randomized Controlled Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2015; 21(30): 9182-9188
Published online Aug 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9182
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients n (%)
0.025-inch group (n = 109)0.035-inch group (n = 160)P value
Age, median ± IQR, year (range)73 ± 12 (31-90)72 ± 16 (20-97)0.8691
Sex male/female68/4183/770.0882
Benign disease69 (63.3)114 (71.3)0.1702
Choledocholithiasis54 (49.5)78 (48.8)0.8992
Gallbladder stones8 (7.3)15 (9.4)0.5582
Benign biliary stricture5 (4.6)7 (4.4)0.8272
Cholangitis1 (0.9)7 (4.4)0.2032
Others1 (0.9)7 (4.4)0.2032
Malignant disease40 (36.7)46 (28.8)0.1702
Pancreatic cancer13 (11.9)26 (16.3)0.3232
Cholangiocarcinoma12 (11.0)6 (3.8)0.0192
Gallbladder cancer5 (4.6)3 (1.9)0.3582
Ampullary cancer3 (2.8)3 (1.9)0.9542
Cholangiocellular carcinoma1 (0.9)1 (0.6)0.6542
Others6 (5.5)7 (4.4)0.8932
Table 2 Results of selective bile duct cannulation n (%)
0.025-inch group (n = 109)0.035-inch group (n = 160)P value
Success rate of selective bile duct cannulation with WGC88 (80.7)138 (86.3)0.2261
Pancreatic duct GW15 (13.8)21 (13.1)0.8801
Success rate of selective bile duct cannulation with pancreatic duct GW7 (46.7)11 (52.4)0.8841
Precutting9 (8.3)11 (6.9)0.6721
Success rate of selective bile duct cannulation with precutting6 (66.7)7 (63.6)0.8931
Final success rate of selective bile duct cannulation101 (92.7)156 (97.5)0.1131
Table 3 Adverse events following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures n (%)
0.025-inch group (n = 109)0.035-inch group (n = 160)P value
Pancreatitis3 (2.8)4 (2.5)0.7931
Mild/moderate/severe, n0/2/11/2/1
Bleeding2 (1.8)1 (0.6)0.7371
Perforation0%0%
Cholangitis0%2 (1.3)0.6541