Hong KH, Kim YJ, Kim JH, Chun SW, Kim HM, Cho JH. Risk factors for complications associated with upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(26): 8125-8131 [PMID: 26185385 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.8125]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Jae Hee Cho, MD, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, 21 Namdong-daero 774 beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon 405-760, South Korea. jhcho9328@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2015; 21(26): 8125-8131 Published online Jul 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.8125
Table 1 Type of foreign bodies n (%)
Type of foreign body
Value
Fish bone
63 (32.5)
Drug
39 (20.1)
Shell
19 (9.8)
Meat
15 (7.7)
Metal
14 (7.2)
Animal bone
12 (6.2)
Stone
11 (5.7)
Plastic
9 (4.6)
Dental prosthetic
7 (3.6)
Tooth brush
2 (1.0)
Bean
1 (0.5)
Others
2 (1.0)
Total
194
Table 2 Anatomic location of foreign bodies n (%)
Location
Value
Esophagus
Upper 1/3 (< 25 cm from incisor)
111 (57.2)
Mid 1/3 (≥ 25 cm, < 40 cm)
55 (28.4)
Lower 1/3 (≥ 40 cm)
7 (3.6)
Stomach
21 (10.8)
Total
194
Table 3 Methods used for removal of foreign bodies n (%)
Method of removal
Value
Pull with biopsy forcep
96 (49.5)
Pull with net
32 (16.5)
Pull with alligator
29 (14.9)
Pull with snare
6 (3.1)
Pull with basket
5 (2.6)
Push into stomach
16 (8.2)
Others
4 (2.1)
Surgery
6 (3.1)
Total
194
Table 4 Complications by foreign bodies n (%)
Complication
Value
Ulcer
11 (5.7)
Laceration
31 (16.0)
Perforation
3 (1.5)
Abscess
1 (0.5)
Total
46 (23.7)
Table 5 Cases of surgical intervention
No.
Cause of surgery
Foreign body type
Foreign body size (mm)
Foreign body location
1
Failure of endoscopic removal
Animal bone
25
Upper esophagus
2
Failure of endoscopic removal
Stone
35
Mid esophagus
3
Failure of endoscopic removal
Stone
30
Mid esophagus
4
Failure of endoscopic removal
Fish bone
35
Mid esophagus
5
Failure of endoscopic removal
Pin
35
Stomach
6
Perforation
Metal
25
Stomach
7
Perforation
Fish bone
25
Upper esophagus
8
Perforation
Shell
35
Upper esophagus
9
Abscess
Fish bone
15
Upper esophagus
Table 6 Results of multivariate analysis following univariate analysis of risk factors for foreign body removal related with complications
Yes (n = 51)
No (n = 143)
P value
OR
P value
Age (yr, mean ± SD)
61.18 ± 17.26
52.58 ± 17.82
0.003
> 60/ ≤ 60
27/24
57/86
0.106
1.84 (0.87-3.91)
0.112
Gender
Male/female
26/25
63/80
0.394
1.42 (0.71-2.86)
0.327
Foreign body
Location
0.381
Upper esophagus
27
84
1
0.213
Mid and lower esophagus
20
42
0.55 (0.25-1.24)
0.151
Stomach
4
17
1.61 (0.46-5.64)
0.460
Size (cm, mean ± SD)
2.22 ± 0.83
1.87 ± 0.85
0.012
> 3 cm / ≤ 3 cm
24/27
43/100
0.028
1.70 (0.82-3.54)
0.155
Sharpness (Yes/No)
36/15
74/69
0.02
2.48 (1.07- 5.72)
0.034
Radio-opacity (Yes/No)
20/31
55/88
0.924
0.98 (0.46-2.08)
0.955
Esophageal stricture (Yes/No)
3/48
24/119
0.053
0.27 (0.06-1.12)
0.071
Duration of impaction (min), mean ± SD, median (min-max)
2304 ± 4245, 390 (56-23000)
853 ± 1195, 270 (60-18720)
0.022, 0.094
> 12 h/ ≤ 12 h
22/29
35/108
0.012
2.42 (1.12-5.25)
0.025
Citation: Hong KH, Kim YJ, Kim JH, Chun SW, Kim HM, Cho JH. Risk factors for complications associated with upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(26): 8125-8131